This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: generation of divxu opcode


aph@cambridge.redhat.com (Andrew Haley)  wrote on 05.07.02 in <15653.38739.706764.135879@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>:

> Dhananjay R. Deshpande writes:

>  > >From the H8300 programming manual  -
>
>  > The divxu instruction divides the contents of a 16-bit register Rd
>  > (destination register) by the contents of an 8-bit register Rs
>  > (source register) and stores the result in the 16-bit register
>  > Rd. The division is unsigned. The operation performed is 16 bits
>  > ÷ 8 bits -> 8-bit quotient and 8-bit remainder. The quotient is
>  > placed in the lower 8 bits of Rd. The remainder is placed in the
>  > upper 8 bits of Rd. Valid results are not assured if division by
>  > zero is attempted or an overflow occurs.
>
> "Valid results are not assured."  Nasty.

Care to explain what you would consider "valid results" in the cases in  
question?

8 bit integers can store neither NaN nor values larger than 8 bit. There  
*are* no valid results.


MfG Kai


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]