This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: hp at bitrange dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:02:32 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
References: <200206131529.LAA09532@caip.rutgers.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.30.0206131703490.42010-100000@dair.pair.com>

 > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
 > 
 > I suggest that "ISO C" should be further qualified as "ISO C89" (or
 > whatever the correct standardese term is).  Necessary only for the
 > "non-C language frontends" file group, of course.
 > brgds, H-P

Definitely not C99.  I thought it was obvious, but I should have been
explicit that we're talking about allowing ISO C90 (or C89 if you
prefer to call it that.)

		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Director of Systems Architecture
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Solutions

References:
- GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]