This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex

From: "Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci" <fwyzard at inwind dot it>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, <geoffk at redhat dot com>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 12:16:55 +0200
Subject: Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex
References: <18840000.1023676881@localhost>

At 12:06 10/06/2002 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> We don't want them in CVS because we assume people using CVS are
> developers and we assume developers can get the tools.

This assumption neglects testers (of which we have too few, especially on
not-so-common platforms, and many of which use guest accounts with limited
resources to perform their testing).

Well, I actually don't have the faintest idea, but if someone doesn't have a table account to test gcc with, maybe will be using weekly or prerelease snapshots instead of CVS, and those have generated files, don't they ?

Just a thought, all in all.

fwyzard

References:
- Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]