gcc archive
date index for June, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2002
23:33 Reload Problem syed rauf
21:21 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Robert Dewar
21:19 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Tom Tromey
19:44 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Daniel Jacobowitz
19:43 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Tim Hollebeek
18:43 Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Nathanael Nerode
18:19 Re: Test suite for new front end: DejaGNU or QMtest Daniel Jacobowitz
18:15 Re: a compiled error Oscar Fuentes
18:15 Re: gcc 3.1 installation Jeff Sturm
18:10 compiled error yugliu
18:00 a compiled error yugliu
14:55 Test suite for new front end: DejaGNU or QMtest Steven Bosscher
13:48 gcc 3.1 installation Gary Smith
13:18 Re: can't build cross compilers on powerpc-apple-darwin5.5 Stan Shebs
12:53 can't build cross compilers on powerpc-apple-darwin5.5 Alan Lehotsky
12:46 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion John David Anglin
12:03 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:51 Mailman results for Freesw freesw-request
10:08 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion John David Anglin
07:51 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Roger Sayle
06:06 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Erik Schnetter
05:33 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:13 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Toon Moene

June 29, 2002
23:55 "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make H. J. Lu
23:07 SUCCESS alpha-ev56 gcc-3.1 spyffe
21:51 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Robert Dewar
18:58 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Tom Tromey
15:13 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion John David Anglin
12:36 CMDTUX_CAT:512: ERROR: Cannot execute C compiler gcc - Anshu Singare
11:21 Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Roger Sayle
11:08 Re: Test result For GCC3.1 Joe Buck
09:58 Succesfull 3.1 Build on Cygwin 1.3.11-3 - XP Pro - c, c++, java John Hepburn

June 28, 2002
23:06 gcc 3.1-Cygwin+Win98SE: Success Eric Krause
21:34 Test result For GCC3.1 sun zongjun
19:31 GCC3.1 compile the C++ failed sun zongjun
18:42 Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3 Richard Henderson
17:23 Re: simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Joern Rennecke
14:30 Re: va_list on PowerPC Gabriel Dos Reis
14:26 Re: [PATCH]: combine.c SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED adjustment Jeff Law
14:24 Re: va_list on PowerPC Aldy Hernandez
14:22 Re: va_list on PowerPC David Edelsohn
14:17 va_list on PowerPC Gabriel Dos Reis
12:25 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Kai Henningsen
11:31 Unicode in C++ for Solaris SPARC David Vaughan
11:27 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Joseph S. Myers
11:01 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Dale Johannesen
10:49 Re: simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Aldy Hernandez
10:16 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Joern Rennecke
10:09 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Andreas Schwab
09:51 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Richard Earnshaw
09:40 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Andreas Schwab
09:38 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Neil Booth
09:37 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Richard Earnshaw
09:32 Re: HPUX 2.0 10.20 Janis Johnson
09:29 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Andreas Schwab
09:17 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Aldy Hernandez
08:55 The Linux binutils 2.12.90.0.14 is released H. J. Lu
08:46 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Aldy Hernandez
07:23 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:46 RE:HPUX 2.0 10.20 Anuchit Aromsawa
06:17 Re: objc/6834: gcc 3.1 wrongly compiles some GNUstep code Nicola Pero
05:50 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Gerald Pfeifer
05:26 Re: Proposal for a introspector API into free software development toolchain James Michael DuPont
05:19 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Bernd Schmidt
05:02 Re: [DotGNU]Proposal for a introspector API into free software developmenttoolchain David Sugar
04:03 Re: help! Eric Botcazou
03:57 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Andreas Jaeger
03:31 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Erik Trulsson
03:17 RE: GCC 3.1.1 Rob Taylor
02:47 Re: simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Joern Rennecke
00:51 Offerta speciale! news
00:51 Offerta speciale! news
00:50 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Bo Thorsen
00:39 GCC 3.1 dynamic_cast fails with DLLs Danny Smith
00:34 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Andreas Schwab
00:29 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Andreas Schwab

June 27, 2002
23:43 simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Aldy Hernandez
22:56 Re: [DotGNU]Proposal for a introspector API into free software developmenttoolchain S11001001
21:36 help! tony_hcb
19:42 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion David O'Brien
19:20 Re: objdir == srcdir is completely unsupported Geoff Keating
19:00 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Stan Shebs
18:25 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion David O'Brien
18:23 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion David O'Brien
17:27 HPUX 2.0 10.20 Eduardo Osorio Armenta
17:06 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Paul Koning
16:00 Re: Tutorial 5 Phil Edwards
15:51 Re: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified bynamespace Mark Mitchell
15:33 Tutorial 5 Mark Butcher
15:31 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Simon Shapiro
15:18 Re: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified by namespace Richard Smith
15:13 Re: objdir == srcdir is completely unsupported Phil Edwards
15:05 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Mark Mitchell
15:04 Re: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified bynamespace Mark Mitchell
15:00 Re: objdir == srcdir is completely unsupported Loren James Rittle
14:52 Re: gcc 3.1 build Janis Johnson
14:21 gcc 3.1 build Terry Boldt
14:16 Proposal for a introspector API into free software development toolchain James Michael DuPont
14:03 Re: CVS repository downtime this weekend David O'Brien
13:59 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Toon Moene
13:51 Re: Move snapshots from the 3.1.1 branch to the 3.2? David O'Brien
13:45 Re: objdir == srcdir is completely unsupported Phil Edwards
13:43 Re: autoconfiscation status notification Andreas Jaeger
13:39 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Tim Josling
13:13 vec_select Joern Rennecke
12:28 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Jack Lloyd
12:26 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Mark Mitchell
12:11 PATCH for Re: found sinix binary of gcc Gerald Pfeifer
12:03 objdir == srcdir is completely unsupported Gerald Pfeifer
11:55 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Toon Moene
11:51 Re: finding dfa scheduler patch Kelley Cook
11:41 Re: Executable has doubled in size! mike stump
11:31 GCC 3.1.1 Nathanael Nerode
11:13 autoconfiscation status notification Nathanael Nerode
10:22 Rétro-conception JAVA vers UML j2u_support
10:22 Rétro-conception JAVA vers UML j2u_support
10:22 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Daniel Berlin
10:14 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Tim Hollebeek
10:08 Re: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified by namespace Gabriel Dos Reis
10:02 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Aldy Hernandez
10:00 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Tim Hollebeek
09:59 Re: gcc on windows ce Alan Lehotsky
09:55 GCC 3.1.1 Mark Mitchell
09:52 Re: High priority bugs Mark Mitchell
09:36 Re: GCC Logo Gerald Pfeifer
09:26 Re: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified by namespace Richard Smith
09:23 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Joern Rennecke
08:36 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Aldy Hernandez
07:32 gcc on windows ce EPSnd
06:59 Re: High priority bugs Reichelt
06:40 High priority bugs Reichelt
03:09 RE: finding dfa scheduler patch Naveen Sharma, Noida
02:44 finding dfa scheduler patch Danish Samad
01:01 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Andreas Schwab
00:58 schedule-ebbs and trapping insns David S. Miller
00:37 Re: Bug in mark_referenced_regs? Mark Mitchell
00:32 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Kai Henningsen

June 26, 2002
23:48 Executable has doubled in size! wayne_thomson
22:34 Re: Bug in mark_referenced_regs? David S. Miller
22:29 Re: Bug in mark_referenced_regs? Mark Mitchell
22:23 Re: Bug in mark_referenced_regs? David S. Miller
20:53 Bug in mark_referenced_regs? Mark Mitchell
19:09 [PATCH]: combine.c SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED adjustment Clarke, Stephen
17:38 Re: fixincludes FUBAR for upgrade Bruce Korb
17:25 Re: Remote testing cross-gcc mike stump
16:49 Re: Remote testing cross-gcc Geoff Keating
16:41 Re: ggc_del_root Geoff Keating
16:12 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Aldy Hernandez
16:03 Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3 Ian Dall
15:50 Re: Tutorial 4 Peter Barada
15:29 Remote testing cross-gcc Dimi Shahbaz
15:00 Re: Tutorial 4b Mark Butcher
14:58 PLEASE CAN YOU ASSIST BENSON SEKO
14:58 Re: Tutorial 4 Mark Butcher
14:32 PLEASE CAN YOU ASSIST BENSON SEKO
13:49 Re: Tutorial 4b Peter Barada
13:42 Re: Tutorial 4b Brett Hunt
12:52 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Toon Moene
12:51 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Toon Moene
11:47 Re: C++ Parser Theodore Papadopoulo
11:13 c++ compiled fronted Ben Woodhead
09:35 Re: cannot find include files Phil Edwards
09:29 cannot find include files Jack Lam
09:17 ggc_del_root Mark Mitchell
09:07 Business Promoter new
09:07 Business Promoter new
08:41 Having trouble configuring gcc Andrew Haley
08:21 Re: Public History of the GCC project Michael Matz
08:10 Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3 Andreas Schwab
08:08 Re: Tutorial 4b Peter Barada
07:55 Re: Tutorial 4 Peter Barada
07:48 Re: C++ front end Richard Earnshaw
07:45 Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3 Richard Henderson
07:40 Re: C++ front end Per Bothner
07:31 Emitting THUNKS for Thumb code Richard Earnshaw
07:10 Having trouble configuring gcc Hall, Cindy
07:10 Re: Public History of the GCC project law
06:54 Re: Public History of the GCC project law
05:01 Re: [RFC]: allowing c99 for-loop scope in gnu89? Bonzini
04:35 Re: Public History of the GCC project Richard Kenner
04:30 Re: C++ front end Michael Matz
03:38 Re: Tiger and FrontEnd for gcc Akim Demaille
03:13 Re: C++ front end Richard Earnshaw
03:06 Re: C++ front end Michael Matz
02:37 Tutorial 4b Mark Butcher
02:31 Re: C++ front end Richard Earnshaw
02:17 Re: C++ front end Michael Matz
01:46 Re: When is it valid to use RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ? Richard Earnshaw
01:36 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Andreas Schwab
01:16 Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3 Ian Dall
01:13 Re: Move snapshots from the 3.1.1 branch to the 3.2? Gerald Pfeifer
00:57 Re: Public History of the GCC project James Michael DuPont
00:53 When is it valid to use RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ? jeroen dobbelaere
00:42 rfc: macros accepting constructors Aldy Hernandez
00:17 Re: Public History of the GCC project Jason Molenda

June 25, 2002
21:39 Re: gcc-3.1 problem Craig Rodrigues
21:31 Re: fixincludes FUBAR for upgrade Bob Friesenhahn
21:29 gcc-3.1 problem Tony, Zhou Jingtao
19:53 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Roger Sayle
19:51 Re: fixincludes FUBAR for upgrade Geoff Keating
19:40 arm instruction generate =?gb2312?q?james=20chen?=
19:37 Re: Public History of the GCC project Richard Kenner
19:05 Re: fixincludes FUBAR for upgrade Bruce Korb
18:04 Re: Public History of the GCC project Joe Buck
17:59 Re: Public History of the GCC project Joe Buck
15:50 Tutorial 4 - Mcore script Mark Butcher
15:49 Tutorial 4 Mark Butcher
15:24 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Robert Dewar
14:55 How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Toon Moene
13:26 Re: folding STRING_CST + INTEGER_CST Chris Lattner
11:22 Re: folding STRING_CST + INTEGER_CST Tim Hollebeek
09:55 Re: Public History of the GCC project mike stump
09:31 Re: Public History of the GCC project Thomas Pollinger
09:30 Re: gcc 2.95.2 built successfully on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Janis Johnson
09:29 Re: Build of gcc 3.1 on Solaris 2.9 Janis Johnson
09:28 Re: Success - complete 3.1 i686-pc-cygwin (cygwin 1.3.10 XP Pro) Janis Johnson
09:20 Re: Tiger and FrontEnd for gcc mike stump
09:19 Re: C++ front end Geert Bosch
08:10 Re: Public History of the GCC project James Michael DuPont
07:45 gcc 2.95.2 built successfully on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Ian Chard
06:50 Re: Public History of the GCC project Hans-Peter Nilsson
06:42 Re: C++ front end Richard Earnshaw
06:30 Re: C++ front end Robert Dewar
06:30 Re: makeinfo problem Gerald Pfeifer
06:30 Re: C++ front end Daniel Berlin
06:22 Re: makeinfo problem Daniel Jacobowitz
06:17 C++ front end Ben Woodhead
06:16 makeinfo problem Martin Kahlert
05:48 Re: folding STRING_CST + INTEGER_CST Aldy Hernandez
03:19 Re: Error with g++ of gcc3.1 (urgently need help) Nathan Sidwell
02:45 Re: Public History of the GCC project James Michael DuPont
02:39 Re: Public History of the GCC project Gerald Pfeifer
02:15 Re: folding STRING_CST + INTEGER_CST Joseph S. Myers
01:12 Public History of the GCC project James Michael DuPont

June 24, 2002
23:58 Re: Error with g++ of gcc3.1 (urgently need help) Phil Edwards
23:35 Error with g++ of gcc3.1 (urgently need help) Tony, Zhou Jingtao
22:41 Move snapshots from the 3.1.1 branch to the 3.2? rbrown64
21:58 Re: srcdir builds & other stuff Geert Bosch
20:48 Build of gcc 3.1 on Solaris 2.9 Chief Geek
20:23 Re: folding STRING_CST + INTEGER_CST Aldy Hernandez
20:15 Tiger and FrontEnd for gcc Andrew Pinski
18:46 gcc-ss-20020624 is now available gccadmin
16:55 Success - complete 3.1 i686-pc-cygwin (cygwin 1.3.10 XP Pro) John Hepburn
16:50 Re: C++ Parser Mark Mitchell
16:41 Re: srcdir builds Benjamin Kosnik
14:50 [tree-ssa-branch] Merged mainline into branch as of 2002-06-24 Diego Novillo
14:23 Re: srcdir builds & other stuff Nathanael Nerode
13:38 Re: bad macro definition: gettext Mumit Khan
13:32 found sinix binary of gcc Jan
12:37 Re: C++ Parser Paolo Carlini
12:26 Re: C++ Parser Bill Wendling
12:17 Precompiled headers Noel Yap
11:21 Re: Creating a tag Jason Molenda
11:16 Re: Creating a tag Daniel Jacobowitz
11:08 Re: bad macro definition: gettext Andrew Haley
11:08 Re: bad macro definition: gettext Neil Booth
10:55 Re: bad macro definition: gettext Troy A. Griffitts
10:47 Re: bad macro definition: gettext Neil Booth
10:39 bad macro definition: gettext Troy A. Griffitts
10:01 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Joe Buck
09:37 Re: Successful build of gcc3.1 on Solaris 2.9 Janis Johnson
09:37 Re: Successful build of GCC 3.1 under Cygwin 1.3.10 for Window NT 4.0 Janis Johnson
09:23 Re: CVS repository downtime this weekend Andrew Cagney
09:17 Re: srcdir builds Diego Novillo
09:15 Re: srcdir builds Phil Edwards
09:05 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Joel Sherrill
08:57 Re: srcdir builds Mark Mitchell
08:54 Re: srcdir builds Mark Mitchell
08:50 Re: C++ Parser Mark Mitchell
08:49 Re: C++ Parser Mark Mitchell
08:39 Re: srcdir builds Benjamin Kosnik
08:10 Mainline is broken on Linux/mips H. J. Lu
08:03 Re: Calling a MIPS maintainer (was Re: GCC build failed for mips-elf with your patch on 2002-06-18T19:37:45Z.) H. J. Lu
03:02 MMS uBook Installation Faqueer Tanvir Ahmed
03:00 MMS uBook Installation Faqueer Tanvir Ahmed
02:51 Re: srcdir builds Arnaud Charlet
02:50 Re: [RFI]: getting objc to grok attributes ?? Nicola Pero
02:44 Re: srcdir builds Gerald Pfeifer
02:18 Re: srcdir builds Arnaud Charlet
01:04 Re: C++ Parser Gabriel Dos Reis
00:56 List of Header files Thorsten Spexard
00:42 Re: folding STRING_CST + INTEGER_CST Joseph S. Myers
00:39 Re: C++ Parser Paolo Carlini
00:30 Re: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified by namespace Dylan Cuthbert

June 23, 2002
23:31 RE: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified by namespace Mountfort, Geoff
23:05 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
22:07 folding STRING_CST + INTEGER_CST Aldy Hernandez
22:07 Re: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified by namespace Dylan Cuthbert
21:44 Successful build of gcc3.1 on Solaris 2.9 claudia anne
21:39 Re: Calling a MIPS maintainer (was Re: GCC build failed for mips-elf with your patch on 2002-06-18T19:37:45Z.) Phil Edwards
19:50 Re: CVS repository downtime this weekend Phil Edwards
19:49 Re: srcdir builds Phil Edwards
19:32 Re: C++ Parser Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:03 Re: about building libobjc_gc Geoff Keating
17:34 Please read it ! Before delete it ! bizidit
17:34 Please read it ! Before delete it ! bizidit
17:11 about building libobjc_gc Nicola Pero
17:09 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure building sparcv7/libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Tom Tromey
15:46 RE: gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified by namespace Mountfort, Geoff
13:23 Toy Front End Tim Josling
12:46 srcdir builds Mark Mitchell
12:45 vax/vms obseletion Nathanael Nerode
11:50 Re: GCC 3.1.1 bootstrap failed on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 John David Anglin
11:12 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Richard Stallman
11:07 Re: C++ Parser Paolo Carlini
11:02 C++ Parser Mark Mitchell
09:17 Re: Missed optimization in m68k law
09:04 Re: Hard registers in RTL templates, -fomit-frame-pointer law
08:57 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
07:25 Toy FrontEnd khalid aggag
06:23 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz

June 22, 2002
23:21 gcc 3.1: bug with inherited templates when specified by namespace Dylan Cuthbert
21:51 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance David Edelsohn
18:44 CVS repository downtime this weekend Christopher Faylor
18:41 Re: Creating a tag Jason Molenda
18:15 GDB 'n' cc; was Convert 3.2 to ISO C Andrew Cagney
15:56 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question (PCH patch gengtype.c) Tim Josling
15:52 Hard registers in RTL templates, -fomit-frame-pointer Ian Dall
15:12 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question (PCH patch gengtype.c) Daniel Berlin
14:56 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question (PCH patch gengtype.c) Tim Josling
14:52 Re: GCL as gcc front end? Robert Dewar
14:47 Re: Official Fortran standards Toon Moene
14:43 Re: Official Fortran standards Robert Dewar
14:41 Re:Possible parser bug in 2.96, 3.0.x and 3.1? Peter Schmid
14:24 Re: Official Fortran standards Toon Moene
14:08 Question about core dumps when running gcc31 testsuite Mack Lobell
12:59 Re: Official Fortran standards Robert Dewar
12:58 Possible parser bug in 2.96, 3.0.x and 3.1? Julian Thomas
11:44 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Paul Koning
10:46 Re: [patch] remove redundant tests Nathanael Nerode
10:46 GCC 3.1.1 bootstrap failed on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 g4136819
10:03 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Robert Dewar
10:01 how to generate money vickybisht
09:57 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
09:39 how to generate money vickybisht
09:29 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
09:21 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Robert Dewar
09:02 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Richard Kenner
09:02 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Graham Stott
08:52 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
08:43 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
08:20 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Andreas Jaeger
07:04 Re: GCC Logo Robert Dewar
06:24 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
06:19 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Richard Kenner
05:41 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Robert Dewar
03:19 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Robert Dewar
01:04 Successful build of GCC 3.1 under Cygwin 1.3.10 for Window NT 4.0 Mike Laman

June 21, 2002
23:11 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
21:56 [tree-ssa-branch] Merged SIMPLE and tree-ssa from ast-optimizer-branch Diego Novillo
21:45 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access /Licensing question Daniel Berlin
19:44 Re: Successful build on Ultrix/VAX (2.95.3) John David Anglin
19:09 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? David O'Brien
18:10 Re: Creating a tag David O'Brien
17:49 Re: Successful build on Ultrix/VAX (2.95.3) Richard Henderson
17:39 Re: trouble compiling c++ Phil Edwards
17:20 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question mike stump
17:09 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
17:02 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
15:47 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Richard Kenner
15:42 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Richard Kenner
14:56 WIESS '02 seeks paper submissions, deadline July 15, 2002. cgd
14:40 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Paul Koning
14:32 Re: probable bug in powerpc-*-aix*, rs6000-*-aix* configury David Edelsohn
14:28 Re: bb.out mike stump
13:52 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Daniel Berlin
13:48 probable bug in powerpc-*-aix*, rs6000-*-aix* configury Nathanael Nerode
12:49 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
12:46 trouble compiling c++ Rexford Gibbs
12:39 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
12:29 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
12:24 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
12:22 tightening RTL flag checks Janis Johnson
12:13 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Robert Dewar
12:07 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Robert Dewar
12:05 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Joe Buck
11:59 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Robert Dewar
11:58 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Daniel Jacobowitz
11:57 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Jan Hubicka
11:48 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Richard Kenner
11:44 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Joe Buck
11:28 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
10:48 Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question Joe Buck
10:18 Re: Successful build on Ultrix/VAX (2.95.3) Janis Johnson
10:08 urgent reply MRS OLIVIA OBRUTH YEPUTA
09:13 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Diego Novillo
07:09 Re: [RFI]: getting objc to grok attributes ?? Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:30 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
06:12 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Michael Matz
06:01 Successful build on Ultrix/VAX (2.95.3) Bert Deknuydt
05:53 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Richard Kenner
04:07 Re: Bizzare segmentation violation Andreas Schwab
03:58 Re: [RFI]: getting objc to grok attributes ?? Nicola Pero
03:53 Bizzare segmentation violation Tony Bryant
03:38 Re: Reformatting libobjc C code? Nicola Pero
02:56 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Jan Hubicka
02:46 Re: bb.out Jan Hubicka
02:42 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Jan Hubicka
02:30 Re: New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work Jan Hubicka
02:29 Re: New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work Jan Hubicka
00:36 Re: GCC 3.1 Linux Cross-Compiler does not build Bo Thorsen

June 20, 2002
23:27 GCC 3.1 Linux Cross-Compiler does not build Denis Doehler
22:07 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Geoff Keating
21:59 Re: Reformatting libobjc C code? Stan Shebs
21:25 Reformatting libobjc C code? rbrown64
20:07 Re: CVS and its problems Nathanael Nerode
19:07 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf law
17:54 bb.out jonathan page
17:07 Re: GCL as gcc front end? Marc Espie
16:55 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
16:53 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Graham Stott
16:53 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Richard Henderson
16:15 Re: Creating a tag Kai Henningsen
15:56 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Toon Moene
15:43 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Richard Henderson
15:02 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Toon Moene
15:00 Re: GCC 3.2 Status Trevor Jenkins
14:51 Re: GCC3.2 gdb prerequisite? Richard Henderson
14:47 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Richard Henderson
14:44 Re: GCC3.2 gdb prerequisite? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:23 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
14:10 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Gerald Pfeifer
14:09 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
14:07 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Toon Moene
14:05 Re: E-mail nags committers after gcc build failures? Gerald Pfeifer
13:58 Re: Another way to tag instructions... Dan Towner
13:56 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
13:53 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance David Edelsohn
13:50 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Toon Moene
13:47 GCC3.2 gdb prerequisite? Tim Josling
13:43 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
13:40 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
13:34 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance David Edelsohn
13:31 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance David Edelsohn
13:27 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
13:25 Re: New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work Daniel Berlin
13:17 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Graham Stott
13:10 Re: New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work Richard Henderson
13:09 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Toon Moene
13:02 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance David Edelsohn
12:50 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance law
12:44 Another way to tag instructions... Alan Lehotsky
12:34 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Andreas Jaeger
12:31 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Janis Johnson
12:31 Re: New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work Jan Hubicka
12:23 The Linux binutils 2.12.90.0.12 is released H . J . Lu
12:09 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
12:08 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Richard Henderson
12:06 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
12:06 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Richard Henderson
12:04 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Richard Henderson
11:57 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
11:53 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
11:53 Re: CVS and its problems Phil Edwards
11:44 Re: CVS and its problems =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==
11:39 Re: New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work Daniel Berlin
11:32 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Jan Hubicka
11:26 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Richard Henderson
11:26 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Jan Hubicka
11:20 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance David Edelsohn
11:16 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Richard Henderson
11:16 Re: Flagging rtx instructions Alan Lehotsky
11:14 Re: New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work Richard Henderson
11:12 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
11:10 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Richard Henderson
11:04 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
11:02 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Richard Henderson
11:00 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
10:58 Re: CVS and its problems Phil Edwards
10:57 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Richard Henderson
10:46 Re: CVS and its problems Daniel Jacobowitz
10:40 Re: CVS and its problems Phil Edwards
10:35 Re: [RFC]: allowing c99 for-loop scope in gnu89? Joseph S. Myers
09:56 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Jan Hubicka
09:55 Re: Combining SCOPE regions law
09:54 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf law
09:53 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Dale Johannesen
09:50 Flagging rtx instructions Dan Towner
09:34 Re: [RFC]: allowing c99 for-loop scope in gnu89? Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:47 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
08:18 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Jan Hubicka
08:07 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Andreas Jaeger
08:06 E-mail nags committers after gcc build failures? Craig Rodrigues
06:52 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
06:29 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
06:22 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Diego Novillo
05:03 compile openjade on HPUX Thomas Porschberg
04:59 Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question James Michael DuPont
04:15 Re: [new-regalloc]: ICE for s390x, bug in df.c? Michael Matz
03:19 [new-regalloc]: ICE for s390x, bug in df.c? Hartmut Penner
02:12 Overloading sizeof Pierre Mallard

June 19, 2002
23:57 Combining SCOPE regions Jan Hubicka
23:50 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Jan Hubicka
23:40 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
23:30 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf Jan Hubicka
23:10 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Martin Kahlert
23:10 Re: [RFC]: allowing c99 for-loop scope in gnu89? Joseph S. Myers
22:52 Re: GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance Andreas Jaeger
21:26 CVS and its problems Nathanael Nerode
20:38 [RFC]: allowing c99 for-loop scope in gnu89? Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:44 GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance David Edelsohn
19:03 Re: Creating a tag John Clarke
18:37 Re: New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work David S. Miller
18:34 Re: Creating a tag Christopher Faylor
18:29 Re: Creating a tag Christopher Faylor
18:21 New branch for SIMPLE/tree-ssa work Diego Novillo
18:06 URGENT ASSISTANT mariam abacha
15:31 Re: subversions anoncvs broken Neil Booth
15:28 Re: subversions anoncvs broken Gerald Pfeifer
15:20 Re: INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf David S. Miller
15:07 Re: GCL as gcc front end? Stan Shebs
14:41 Re: GCL as gcc front end? mike stump
14:34 Re: GCL as gcc front end? Geoff Keating
14:22 subversions anoncvs broken Aaron Lehmann
14:01 Re: Tutorial 3 Peter Barada
13:39 INSN_SCOPE changes break mips-elf law
13:21 Re: Creating a tag Geoff Keating
13:09 GCL as gcc front end? Camm Maguire
12:52 Re: Creating a tag Joseph S. Myers
12:52 Re: 12 bits compiler Richard Henderson
12:49 Re: Creating a tag law
12:44 Re: Creating a tag law
12:39 Re: Creating a tag Mark Mitchell
12:35 Re: Creating a tag law
12:35 Re: Creating a tag David Edelsohn
12:32 Re: Creating a tag Robert Lipe
12:29 Re: Creating a tag Mark Mitchell
12:19 Re: Creating a tag Joseph S. Myers
12:19 Re: Creating a tag law
12:17 Re: Creating a tag law
12:14 ip2k port reviewing/accepting Denis Chertykov
11:52 Has someone removed non-stale CVS locks? Michael Matz
11:49 Re: Creating a tag David Edelsohn
11:46 Re: Creating a tag Daniel Berlin
11:38 Re: Creating a tag Michael Matz
11:38 Re: Creating a tag Daniel Berlin
11:24 Re: Creating a tag David Edelsohn
10:48 Re: Problems with genautomata Vladimir Makarov
10:42 Creating a tag Mark Mitchell
10:23 The test md file law
10:21 Problems with genautomata law
10:12 Re: GCC 3.2 Status Richard Henderson
09:23 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Mark Mitchell
09:19 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Mark Mitchell
09:06 Re: Stray characters in .o files.... Thomas J Amato
08:33 Re: Stray characters in .o files.... Zack Weinberg
08:29 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Jan Hubicka
08:28 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Jan Hubicka
08:06 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Bernd Schmidt
07:58 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Jan Hubicka
07:55 Stray characters in .o files.... Thomas J Amato
07:38 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Gerald Pfeifer
07:25 Re: A patch for genautomata Vladimir Makarov
07:19 _cpp_replacement_text_len and len Andrew Pinski
07:11 Re: A patch for genautomata Dan Towner
06:57 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Jan Hubicka
06:45 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Bernd Schmidt
06:04 help needed Shirish S Deshmukh
05:54 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Jan Hubicka
04:48 Re: 12 bits compiler Lars Brinkhoff
04:45 Re: 12 bits compiler Pierre Mallard
04:38 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Bernd Schmidt
04:32 Re: 12 bits compiler Lars Brinkhoff
04:24 12 bits compiler Pierre Mallard
01:22 Re: Mainline bootstrap problem Andreas Schwab
00:55 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
00:53 Re: GCC 3.2 Status Jan Hubicka

June 18, 2002
21:05 Re: Official Fortran standards Tim Prince
20:48 Re: Official Fortran standards reg
20:35 Re: Calling a MIPS maintainer (was Re: GCC build failed for mips-elf with your patch on 2002-06-18T19:37:45Z.) H . J . Lu
20:34 Re: ppc prefetch Aldy Hernandez
20:20 Re: ppc prefetch David Edelsohn
20:14 Official Fortran standards Maciej Z. Pindera
20:13 ppc prefetch Aldy Hernandez
20:12 Mainline bootstrap problem Jerry Quinn
20:06 Re: Quality of GCC 3.1 Bryce McKinlay
19:46 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Geert Bosch
19:31 Re: SSE types and structures Aldy Hernandez
18:59 Re: SSE types and structures Aldy Hernandez
18:52 Re: Calling a MIPS maintainer (was Re: GCC build failed formips-elf with your patch on 2002-06-18T19:37:45Z.) Eric Christopher
18:25 Re: Calling a MIPS maintainer (was Re: GCC build failed for mips-elf with your patch on 2002-06-18T19:37:45Z.) Phil Edwards
18:16 Re: Calling a MIPS maintainer (was Re: GCC build failed formips-elf with your patch on 2002-06-18T19:37:45Z.) Eric Christopher
17:57 Re: Calling a MIPS maintainer (was Re: GCC build failed for mips-elf with your patch on 2002-06-18T19:37:45Z.) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:16 Calling a MIPS maintainer (was Re: GCC build failed for mips-elf with your patch on 2002-06-18T19:37:45Z.) Phil Edwards
16:56 Re: Tutorial 3 Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:51 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Michael S. Zick
15:38 Re: Successful build - GCC 3.1.1 on Cygwin (Win2000) targeting mingw32 Janis Johnson
15:29 Re: Successful gcc Version 3.1 Build Janis Johnson
15:28 Re: Successful build -- GCC 3.1 under Windows XP / SFU 3 ( Interix ) Janis Johnson
15:21 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Gerald Pfeifer
14:50 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status John David Anglin
14:41 Re: Tutorial 3 Mark Butcher
14:37 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Toon Moene
14:33 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Gerald Pfeifer
14:29 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Gerald Pfeifer
14:26 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Gerald Pfeifer
14:10 Attn. Steering Committee: decision on obseleting vax/vms Nathanael Nerode
11:18 GCC 3.2 Status Mark Mitchell
11:13 GCC 3.1.1 Status Mark Mitchell
10:45 Re: scanasm.exp doesn't work too well Andreas Jaeger
10:01 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
09:52 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
09:50 Re: precision. mike stump
09:22 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
09:15 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
08:35 precision. Ian Molton
08:21 Re: Quality of GCC 3.1 Andrew Haley
08:04 Re: DFA Instruction Output for VLIW Vladimir Makarov
08:04 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
07:58 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
07:55 Re: Quality of GCC 3.1 Jan Hubicka
07:51 Re: SSE types and structures Bernd Schmidt
07:46 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
07:40 Re: SSE types and structures Bernd Schmidt
07:33 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
06:49 Re: performance regression: inlining with constant arguments Kelley Cook
04:10 ASM_OUTPUT_OPCODE returning new string Dan Towner
04:01 Re: [new regalloc]: Miscompile for s390x Hartmut Penner
03:28 Re: DFA Instruction Output for VLIW Dan Towner
02:34 gcc-ss-20020617 is now available gccadmin
02:15 Re: Quality of GCC 3.1 Florian Weimer
00:16 Re: Quality of GCC 3.1 Rene Rebe
00:05 Virus incident [EXCHNT] Panda Antivirus for E
00:05 Virus incident [EXCHNT] Panda Antivirus for E
00:04 Spice girls' vocal concert Kaen123

June 17, 2002
23:34 help -Intermediate Representation Shirish S Deshmukh
17:31 Re: FDEs for virtual thunks Richard Henderson
17:25 Re: FDEs for virtual thunks Matthew Austern
17:19 Re: FDEs for virtual thunks Richard Henderson
17:15 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Daniel Berlin
15:46 Re: Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Andrew Pinski
15:39 Re: Quality of GCC 3.1 Neil Booth
15:39 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
15:36 Re: Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Jan-Hendrik Palic
15:35 Re: The content of the standard library in GCC Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
15:29 FDEs for virtual thunks Matthew Austern
15:27 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Mark Mitchell
15:25 Re: Quality of GCC 3.1 Will Cohen
15:15 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Tom Tromey
15:09 Re: Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Stan Shebs
15:08 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Jason Merrill
15:05 Re: Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Stan Shebs
15:05 Re: Quality of GCC 3.1 Rene Rebe
14:46 Re: Is it time to flip the switch to make -std=gnu99 the default? Joseph S. Myers
14:20 Re: Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Andrew Pinski
14:18 Re: Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Karin Kosina
14:12 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Richard Henderson
14:11 Quality of GCC 3.1 Wit Jakuczun
14:11 Re: Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Brad House
14:11 Re: Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Andrew Pinski
13:45 Changes for running GCC on MacOS X ... Jan-Hendrik Palic
13:36 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Richard Henderson
13:32 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Diego Novillo
13:25 Re: Tutorial 3 Phil Edwards
13:20 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Jason Merrill
13:07 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Diego Novillo
13:03 Re: RFC: DWARF2 support for VAX ELF. Jason R Thorpe
12:05 Is it time to flip the switch to make -std=gnu99 the default? Kelley Cook
12:04 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Jason Merrill
12:03 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Jason Merrill
11:53 Bi-arch multilib questions Ulrich Weigand
11:08 Re: Is it same? mike stump
11:08 PATCH for Re: mirrors. Gerald Pfeifer
10:40 Re: New mainline bootstrap failure Andreas Schwab
10:28 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
10:23 Re: What does it mean "ppc backend doesn't support sibcalls" ? Dale Johannesen
10:18 Change of email address Neil Booth
10:17 Re: New mainline bootstrap failure Vladimir N. Makarov
09:40 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Diego Novillo
09:32 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Joseph S. Myers
09:31 Re: Tutorial 3 Peter Barada
09:30 GCC GNAT 6856 & BLKmode question Steve Ellcey
09:24 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Diego Novillo
09:13 x86 paired 32-bit load/stores Will Cohen
09:09 [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++ Jason Merrill
09:08 Re: CVS server deadlocked? Jason Molenda
08:49 mirrors. georg.ritter
08:37 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Toon Moene
08:08 Re: A couple of FORTRAN porting questions for g77 Toon Moene
07:33 Re: [RFI]: getting objc to grok attributes ?? Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:32 i18n patch coming Bonzini
07:26 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
07:13 Re: CVS server deadlocked? law
07:08 [ast-optimizer-branch] Parallel builds for libjava broken Diego Novillo
07:02 Re: [new regalloc]: Miscompile for s390x Michael Matz
06:30 Re: DFA Instruction Output for VLIW Vladimir N. Makarov
06:22 Successful build - GCC 3.1.1 on Cygwin (Win2000) targeting mingw32 Mats Forslöf
05:28 Re: DFA Instruction Output for VLIW Dan Towner
05:27 Re: CVS server deadlocked? Michael Matz
04:07 [new regalloc]: Miscompile for s390x Hartmut Penner
03:34 Re: CVS server deadlocked? Geoff Keating
03:07 Re: [RFI]: getting objc to grok attributes ?? Nicola Pero
02:53 Re: New mainline bootstrap failure Franz Sirl
02:46 performance regression: inlining with constant arguments Michel LESPINASSE
01:57 Tutorial 3 Andrew Haley
01:35 New mainline bootstrap failure Andreas Schwab
01:30 Belgium mirror no longer working Benny.Geys
00:52 Re: CVS server deadlocked? Aldy Hernandez
00:38 Re: [RFI]: getting objc to grok attributes ?? Joseph S. Myers
00:28 Stack Abstraction !! Naveen Sharma, Noida
00:01 Re: Is this a bug or I misunderstand? Maggie Mitchell

June 16, 2002
23:53 Re: Is this a bug or I misunderstand? Neil Booth
23:29 Re: Is this a bug or I misunderstand? maggie_shh
23:24 Re: Is this a bug or I misunderstand? maggie_shh
23:11 Re: Is this a bug or I misunderstand? Andrew Pinski
22:55 Is this a bug or I misunderstand? Maggie Mitchell
21:51 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merged mainline into branch as of 2002-06-16 Diego Novillo
20:58 Re: CVS server deadlocked? Geoff Keating
20:22 Is it same? Maggie Mitchell
20:08 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? (and cygwin gcc 3.1 problem ) maggie_shh
20:03 Successful gcc Version 3.1 Build kath
19:29 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in stage1 gengenrtl on Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:22 [RFI]: getting objc to grok attributes ?? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:01 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? (and cygwin gcc 3.1 problem ) Dylan Cuthbert
17:46 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in stage1 gengenrtl on Brad Lucier
17:09 OSR 5.0.6 good compilation Jean-Pierre Radley
17:03 Re: CVS server deadlocked? Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:46 Re: CVS server deadlocked? Diego Novillo
15:42 Tutorial 3 Mark Butcher
12:46 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
12:43 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
12:40 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in stage1 gengenrtl on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 law
12:39 Re: Getting past gcc-3.2 20000611 breakage. Richard Henderson
12:34 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
11:26 Getting past gcc-3.2 20000611 breakage. Matt Thomas
11:01 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
10:59 Re: [patch] generic simd support Richard Henderson
10:38 Re: What does it mean "ppc backend doesn't support sibcalls" ? Richard Henderson
10:16 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Kai Henningsen
08:33 Re: CVS server deadlocked? law
08:12 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
05:53 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. Marc Espie
02:31 CVS server deadlocked? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:28 Re: What does it mean "ppc backend doesn't support sibcalls" ? Colin Douglas Howell
02:10 Re: [patch] generic simd support Aldy Hernandez

June 15, 2002
23:38 What does it mean "ppc backend doesn't support sibcalls" ? Felix Shvaiger
23:19 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Michael Veksler
22:58 Re: GCC Logo Phil Edwards
22:25 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
19:41 Re: GCC-3.1: g++ and default parameters of methods Rene Rebe
19:07 Re: GCC-3.1: g++ and default parameters of methods Oscar Fuentes
18:54 Re: SH multilib removal possibility "-m1 -ml" & "-m2 -ml" Joern Rennecke
18:04 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. Marc Espie
17:57 GCC-3.1: g++ and default parameters of methods Rene Rebe
14:23 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
13:30 Re: SH multilib removal possibility "-m1 -ml" & "-m2 -ml" tm
13:05 About the loop optimizer Eric Botcazou
12:39 Incorrect warning about uninitialized variable Michel LESPINASSE
12:19 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
11:34 Re: Query, Joseph S. Myers
11:26 Re: GCC Logo Colin Douglas Howell
10:41 Re: The content of the standard library in GCC Alexandre Oliva
10:38 Re: Query, Alexandre Oliva
09:06 The content of the standard library in GCC =?big5?q?Mutics=20Kenneth?=
08:38 Re: Copyright Assignment Gerald Pfeifer
07:48 Re: [DEBUG] RTX allocation debugging Daniel Berlin
07:05 Re: GCC Logo David S. Miller
07:03 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in stage1 gengenrtl onsparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
06:37 GCC Logo starman
05:59 Re: SH multilib removal possibility "-m1 -ml" & "-m2 -ml" Joel Sherrill
05:44 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in stage1 gengenrtl on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:08 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
04:26 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Jan Hubicka
03:53 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
03:05 Re: [DEBUG] RTX allocation debugging Aldy Hernandez
02:11 Re: State of the art testsuite technology Florian Weimer
00:31 Re: Suggest: remove enquire.c and related rules from the tree. Zack Weinberg

June 14, 2002
22:39 Query, Centurion Computer Technology
21:17 Suggest: remove enquire.c and related rules from the tree. Nathanael Nerode
17:53 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Ross Smith
17:32 Re: missed optimization in m68k Alan Lehotsky
17:05 SH multilib removal possibility "-m1 -ml" & "-m2 -ml" tm
16:46 Re: missed optimization in m68k Peter Barada
16:41 Re: missed optimization in m68k Peter Barada
16:34 Re: Missed optimization in m68k Peter Barada
16:19 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in stage1 gengenrtl on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
15:35 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
15:30 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Nix
15:04 Re: Missed optimization in m68k law
15:00 Re: mipsel-linux-g++ Eric Christopher
14:45 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Eric Christopher
14:30 Re: Missed optimization in m68k Alan Lehotsky
14:27 Re: alphaev67 build fails xgcc Andrew Pinski
14:13 Re: Missed optimization in m68k law
14:11 Re: alphaev67 build fails xgcc Richard Henderson
14:07 Re: Missed optimization in m68k Alan Lehotsky
13:21 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:49 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Andrew Haley
12:45 Re: Missed optimization in m68k law
12:30 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Nix
12:23 Missed optimization in m68k Peter Barada
12:09 Re: DFA Instruction Output for VLIW Vladimir Makarov
11:59 Re: State of the art testsuite technology mike stump
11:40 Re: DFA Instruction Output for VLIW law
10:29 3.2 bootstrap failure in stage1 gengenrtl on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
10:29 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Bonzini
10:28 Re: alphaev67 build fails xgcc Andrew Pinski
10:24 alphaev67 build fails xgcc bemis
10:21 DFA Instruction Output for VLIW Dan Towner
10:21 State of the art testsuite technology Florian Weimer
10:04 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
09:46 Successful build -- GCC 3.1 under Windows XP / SFU 3 ( Interix ) Nedelcho Stanev
08:56 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Andreas Schwab
08:46 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Richard Sandiford
08:44 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion 'David Scott Urban
08:29 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Diego Novillo
08:22 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Joe Buck
08:15 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Robert Lipe
08:12 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Jakub Jelinek
08:01 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Richard Earnshaw
07:58 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Alan Lehotsky
07:53 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Dave Hudson
07:41 Re: Interesting Makefile race condition ... Ulrich Weigand
07:28 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:25 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Daniel Berlin
07:21 cross-compiler build problem on Mac OS X - _gt_ggc_r_gt_darwin_hundefined Alan Lehotsky
07:14 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:10 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:02 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:57 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:42 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
06:18 Re: profiling Will Cohen
04:07 [DEBUG] RTX allocation debugging David S. Miller
03:52 Re: Sharing hard registers David S. Miller
03:48 Re: DECL_RTL vs. explicit make_decl_rtl calls David S. Miller
03:48 Re: Sharing hard registers law
03:26 Re: Sharing hard registers David S. Miller
03:25 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Richard Sandiford
03:23 Re: FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASSES Aldy Hernandez
03:22 Re: Sharing hard registers David S. Miller
03:21 Re: Sharing hard registers law
03:20 Re: Sharing hard registers Jan Hubicka
03:10 Re: Sharing hard registers David S. Miller
03:09 Re: FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASSES Michael Matz
02:59 Re: Sharing hard registers Jan Hubicka
02:49 profiling Zdenka Safarzik
02:01 mipsel-linux-g++ Stephane List
01:50 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
01:38 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
01:33 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Andreas Schwab
00:54 Re: Tutorial Time - part 2 Alexandre Oliva
00:35 newcomer question about 64Bit version on hpux Thomas Porschberg
00:16 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Florian Weimer

June 13, 2002
23:31 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Gabriel Dos Reis
23:12 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Dave Parsons
22:29 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure building sparcv7/libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
21:42 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Aldy Hernandez
21:00 Re: BOUNCE apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net: Non-member submission from [gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>] nobody
20:34 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure building sparcv7/libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Tom Tromey
20:24 CVS version of ld and CVS version of gcc Andrew Pinski
20:13 libiberty/fibheap.c, LONG_MIN, and powerpc-eabisim Phil Edwards
19:22 Re: Sharing hard registers law
19:10 Re: FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASSES Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:09 Re: Sharing hard registers Alan Lehotsky
18:18 FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASSES Aldy Hernandez
18:02 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Joseph S. Myers
18:00 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Joseph S. Myers
17:15 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Phil Edwards
16:33 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
16:13 Re: Tutorial Time Mark Butcher
15:44 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Joe Buck
15:36 Re: QMTest Update Gabriel Dos Reis
15:34 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Doug Warmke
15:25 Re: QMTest Update Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:24 Re: Sharing hard registers law
15:21 3.2 bootstrap failure building sparcv7/libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
15:02 Re: QMTest Update Gabriel Dos Reis
15:00 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Gabriel Dos Reis
14:55 Re: QMTest Update Loren James Rittle
14:54 Re: Results for 3.2 20020613 (experimental) testsuite on i686-unknown-openbsd3.1 Andrew Pinski
14:49 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:44 Re: QMTest Update Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:07 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Doug Warmke
13:31 Re: DECL_RTL vs. explicit make_decl_rtl calls law
13:24 Sharing hard registers law
13:21 Re: scanasm.exp doesn't work too well H . J . Lu
13:20 Re: Interesting Makefile race condition ... DJ Delorie
13:15 Re: scanasm.exp doesn't work too well Jakub Jelinek
13:06 Interesting Makefile race condition ... Ulrich Weigand
12:55 scanasm.exp doesn't work too well H . J . Lu
12:26 Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Neil Booth
12:23 Re: DECL_RTL vs. explicit make_decl_rtl calls Neil Booth
11:22 Re: QMTest Update Joe Buck
11:09 Tutorial Time - part 2 Mark Butcher
10:53 Re: Tutorial Time mike stump
10:37 Re: QMTest Update Mark Mitchell
10:27 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
10:24 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
10:20 Re: [patch] obselete vax-*-vms* Nathanael Nerode
10:17 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
09:42 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
09:40 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
09:38 Re: SSE types and structures Richard Henderson
09:35 Re: SSE types and structures Jan Hubicka
09:12 Re: Tutorial Time Gokhan Kisacikoglu
09:04 Re: Tutorial Time Richard Henderson
09:01 Re: adjust_stack variants? Jan Hubicka
08:57 Re: adjust_stack variants? Brett Boren
08:52 Re: DECL_RTL vs. explicit make_decl_rtl calls Richard Henderson
08:38 Re: adjust_stack variants? Jan Hubicka
08:31 adjust_stack variants? Brett Boren
08:29 GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:23 Re: Install question. Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
08:22 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Tim Hollebeek
08:16 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Gabriel Paubert
07:47 Re: DECL_RTL vs. explicit make_decl_rtl calls law
07:45 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Paul Koning
06:53 Install question. michael robertson
06:40 Re: why would two copies of gcc-2.95.2 yield different output? David T-G
06:33 Re: why would two copies of gcc-2.95.2 yield different output? David T-G
06:29 Current cvs bootstrap failure on arm-linux jeroen dobbelaere
03:20 Pentium optimization problem Pavel Zeman
03:16 RE: why would two copies of gcc-2.95.2 yield different output? Rupert Wood
03:01 Re: DECL_RTL vs. explicit make_decl_rtl calls David S. Miller
01:40 Re: [new regalloc]: Spill for SImode down in FP regs Michael Matz
00:57 inline memcpy bug Martin Kahlert
00:09 Re: QMTest Update Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00 Re: centralizing 'export' Gabriel Dos Reis

June 12, 2002
23:58 Re: centralizing 'export' Gabriel Dos Reis
23:57 Re: centralizing 'export' Gabriel Dos Reis
23:55 [new regalloc]: Spill for SImode down in FP regs Hartmut Penner
22:41 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Andris Pavenis
22:03 Falls du Kinder hast - wichtig! Gegen Gewalt am Computer! xcd4u
22:03 Falls du Kinder hast - wichtig! Gegen Gewalt am Computer! xcd4u
20:19 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
20:17 Re: why would two copies of gcc-2.95.2 yield different output? Fergus Henderson
20:17 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:15 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Doug Warmke
20:15 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. Fergus Henderson
20:10 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:01 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Geoff Keating
18:55 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Jim Wilson
18:37 Re: c-torture test Joe Buck
17:53 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Dylan Cuthbert
17:50 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Joseph S. Myers
17:21 Re: RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not definedanywhere Mark Mitchell
17:12 RFDiscussion: Macros used throughout gcc but not defined anywhere Zack Weinberg
17:01 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
16:58 Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure Diego Novillo
16:56 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. DJ Delorie
16:54 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
16:49 Re: whither specs? H . J . Lu
16:38 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. DJ Delorie
16:25 Re: QMTest Update Joseph S. Myers
16:17 Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.cfailure Jason Merrill
16:15 Re: c-torture test mike stump
16:06 Re: QMTest Update Jim Wilson
16:03 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
15:48 Tutorial Time Mark Butcher
15:26 Re: whither specs? Richard Henderson
13:30 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. DJ Delorie
13:22 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
13:15 Re: Compiling gcc without an existing cc compiler. Joe Buck
13:07 Re: Compiling gcc without an existing cc compiler. Brad House
12:37 Compiling gcc without an existing cc compiler. Loo, Peter
12:33 Re: failure notice Masayuki Ida
12:16 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Geoff Keating
12:00 why would two copies of gcc-2.95.2 yield different output? David T-G
11:41 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Jan Hubicka
11:36 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. DJ Delorie
11:36 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. DJ Delorie
11:26 Re: whither specs? Theodore Papadopoulo
11:26 c-torture test Shan Wang
11:23 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
11:21 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Kelley Cook
11:14 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. DJ Delorie
11:03 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Jason R Thorpe
11:01 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
10:45 Re: whither specs? Richard Henderson
10:41 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. DJ Delorie
10:40 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Alexandre Oliva
09:28 Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure Diego Novillo
09:18 Re: RFC: Java inliner Daniel Berlin
09:13 Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.cfailure Jason Merrill
09:00 Re: RFC: Java inliner Daniel Berlin
08:45 Re: AIX bootstrap failure due to libiberty configure ICE law
08:40 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
08:32 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Paolo Carlini
08:19 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:59 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Alexandre Oliva
07:45 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:21 Re: multi-line string deprecated Alexandre Oliva
07:13 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Alexandre Oliva
06:56 RE: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Rob Taylor
06:38 Re: C++ demangling question Mark Mitchell
06:15 Re: RFC: Java inliner Mark Mitchell
05:15 multi-line string deprecated Tiemo Krüger - mycable GmbH
05:09 improved assertions? Neal D. Becker
05:07 Re: SEQUENCEs Marc Espie
05:05 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Marc Espie
04:47 unable to satisfy constraint umar janjua
03:35 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
03:25 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Dylan Cuthbert
03:12 regarding glibc muthu kumar
03:03 Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.cfailure Jason Merrill
02:34 RE: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Rob Taylor
02:24 Re: C++ demangling question Nathan Sidwell
01:39 Re: RFC: Java inliner Per Bothner
01:26 Re: gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Dylan Cuthbert
01:20 Re: gengtype Problem Dan Towner
00:41 Re: whither specs? Theodore Papadopoulo

June 11, 2002
23:25 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Ross Smith
22:47 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code cgd
22:36 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code Neil Booth
22:31 Re: RFC: Java inliner Mark Mitchell
22:19 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code cgd
22:07 gcc 3.1 and gdb 5.2? Doug Warmke
21:12 Example of covaraint return fix [PR 3706] David Hunt
20:35 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Alexandre Oliva
20:02 error in cvs checkout Brad Lucier
19:48 Re: Dwarf2 really working in gcc 3.1? Douglas B Rupp
19:31 MDaemon Notification -- Attachment Removed postmaster
18:49 Re: AIX bootstrap failure due to libiberty configure ICE David Edelsohn
18:48 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Daniel Jacobowitz
18:38 Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure Diego Novillo
17:59 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Zack Weinberg
17:42 Dwarf2 really working in gcc 3.1? Dylan Cuthbert
17:38 PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure Jason Merrill
17:23 Re: AIX bootstrap failure due to libiberty configure ICE law
17:15 Re: AIX bootstrap failure due to libiberty configure ICE David Edelsohn
17:06 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Daniel Jacobowitz
16:48 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Loren James Rittle
16:25 Re: whither specs? Jason R Thorpe
16:11 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Phil Edwards
16:04 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Marc Espie
15:59 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Alexandre Oliva
15:33 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Marc Espie
15:14 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Loren James Rittle
14:51 Re: probably the wrong place Alexandre Oliva
14:38 C++ demangling question Wirawan Purwanto
13:49 Re: CVS Documentation Joseph S. Myers
13:39 Re: SEQUENCEs Joern Rennecke
13:36 Idea for a GCC conference Bradley M. Kuhn
13:05 CVS Documentation Kevin Handy
12:56 i18n brokenness of C++ Bonzini
12:50 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure Diego Novillo
12:46 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure Daniel Berlin
12:41 [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure Diego Novillo
11:29 Re: gengtype Problem Geoff Keating
11:24 Re: RFC: Java inliner Diego Novillo
10:59 AIX bootstrap failure due to libiberty configure ICE David Edelsohn
09:58 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
09:49 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Zack Weinberg
09:31 Re: RFC: Java inliner Joe Buck
09:31 Re: A simple question Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
09:21 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Geoff Keating
09:18 [ast-optimizer-branch] Re-branching? Diego Novillo
08:46 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
08:39 A simple question nebula
07:56 profiling shared libraries Taha Mannan Jiruwala
07:53 Re: RFC: Java inliner Fergus Henderson
07:47 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Diego Novillo
07:30 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:26 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merged PCH changes into branch Diego Novillo
07:25 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
07:22 Re: RFC: Java inliner Daniel Berlin
07:00 Re: SEQUENCEs law
06:59 RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
06:50 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Jan Hubicka
06:39 internal compiler error:internal error: Segmentat ion fault bemis
06:04 C_INCLUDE_PATH && C_PLUS_INCLUDE_PATH && LIBRARY_PATH Justin Piszcz
05:57 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Diego Novillo
05:48 gengtype Problem Dan Towner
05:28 RE: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 S. Bosscher
05:11 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue.. Joern Rennecke
05:08 Re: SEQUENCEs David S. Miller
05:07 Copyright Assignment Valentin Rakush
04:50 Re: SEQUENCEs Joern Rennecke
03:58 Re: SEQUENCEs Joern Rennecke
03:38 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Jan Hubicka
03:31 Re: dcgettext__ undefined cuases builds on alpha to FAIL Philipp Thomas
03:21 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Jan Hubicka
03:19 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Jan Hubicka
01:58 Mainline bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
01:36 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Zack Weinberg
00:45 Re: RFC: DWARF2 support for VAX ELF. Richard Henderson

June 10, 2002
23:56 bootstrap failure on darwin 5.5 (trunk) Andreas Tobler
23:47 RFC: DWARF2 support for VAX ELF. Matt Thomas
22:39 3.2 bootstrap failure in init_caller_save on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
21:10 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Richard Henderson
20:54 Re: About gcc Tim Prince
20:43 Re: SEQUENCEs law
20:25 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Tim Prince
20:06 gcc-ss-20020610 is now available gccadmin
20:01 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Geoff Keating
19:52 probably the wrong place Brian Manning
19:43 Re: [RFC] Covariant return patch for GCC 3.1 =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==
19:41 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:39 Re: About gcc mike stump
19:35 Re: SEQUENCEs Marc Espie
19:25 About gcc =?GB2312?Q?=B6=AD=BA=C6(Housto
19:02 Re: whither specs? Mark Mitchell
18:51 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Stephen L Moshier
18:22 [RFC] Covariant return patch for GCC 3.1 David Hunt
17:56 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Richard Henderson
17:46 Re: GCC 3.1 on SuSE 7.1 Janis Johnson
17:44 Re: floating point war casualty list Paul Koning
17:32 GCC 3.1 on SuSE 7.1 Yang Wang
17:22 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Stan Shebs
17:03 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Stephen L Moshier
15:37 Re: floating point war casualty list Richard Henderson
15:01 Re: whither specs? Zack Weinberg
14:23 Re: whither specs? Matthias Benkmann
14:17 Re: PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Geoff Keating
13:49 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Nix
13:44 PCH merge: bootstrap failure, gengtype consumes all file descriptors Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:36 The Linux binutils 2.12.90.0.11 is released. H . J . Lu
12:17 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Fergus Henderson
11:47 Re: whither specs? Tom Tromey
11:44 Re: whither specs? Mumit Khan
11:18 Re: How to write config file for a new target? mike stump
11:01 Re: whither specs? David Edelsohn
10:56 Re: whither specs? H . J . Lu
10:55 Re: whither specs? Geoff Keating
10:33 Re: whither specs? David Edelsohn
10:31 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Jonathan Lennox
10:29 whither specs? Geoff Keating
10:26 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Daniel Berlin
10:22 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.1 Janis Johnson
10:22 Re: GCC 3.1 successfully compiled and installed Janis Johnson
10:19 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) DJ Delorie
10:16 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Diego Novillo
10:07 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Steven Bosscher
09:58 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Diego Novillo
09:53 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Daniel Berlin
09:36 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Michal Moskal
09:20 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Diego Novillo
08:50 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Tom Tromey
08:06 Re: howto compile gnat included in gcc-3.1? Nils Radtke
07:58 dcgettext__ undefined cuases builds on alpha to FAIL bemis
07:48 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Diego Novillo
07:32 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:55 Re: howto compile gnat included in gcc-3.1? Marc Espie
06:50 Re: [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 Daniel Berlin
06:36 Re: howto compile gnat included in gcc-3.1? Nils Radtke
06:09 Re: howto compile gnat included in gcc-3.1? Marc Espie
06:08 Problems with libtool implementation of osf style versioning Rainer Orth
05:41 howto compile gnat included in gcc-3.1? Nils Radtke
03:17 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
03:08 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex Gerald Pfeifer
03:01 Re: target removal... Rainer Orth
02:32 Re: Spammed on posting a bug in GNATS Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:17 [RFC] Extension of SIMPLE for Fortran 95 S. Bosscher
02:13 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code Eric Christopher
02:09 Spammed on posting a bug in GNATS Richard Dawe
00:13 Majordomo results: A funny game majordomo-owner
00:01 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code cgd

June 09, 2002
23:59 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex Mark Mitchell
23:51 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code cgd
23:30 How to write config file for a new target? Jiang Alan
23:07 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Russ Allbery
23:04 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Neil Booth
21:49 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) Phil Edwards
16:23 Successful build of gcc-3.1 bdavidso
14:59 GCC 3.1 successfully compiled and installed Piotr Kalinowski
13:54 Re: is_predicate_p? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:49 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code Eric Christopher
13:27 Re: is_predicate_p? Robert Dewar
13:20 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code Neil Booth
13:12 Question about alternative PATHS with GCC-3.1 Justin Piszcz
13:00 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code Eric Christopher
12:57 Re: is_predicate_p? Nathan Sidwell
10:15 Re: is_predicate_p? Diego Novillo
10:09 Re: is_predicate_p? Robert Dewar
08:07 Re: is_predicate_p? Diego Novillo
07:45 Re: is_predicate_p? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:56 Is this a gcc bug? [Alpha ev6, gcc 3.1, cdrdao] Thorsten Kranzkowski
04:25 Re: is_predicate_p? Nathan Sidwell
01:43 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code Neil Booth
00:20 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law

June 08, 2002
23:19 Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code cgd
20:16 mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code cgd
19:16 Re: is_predicate_p? Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:13 Re: is_predicate_p? Tim Hollebeek
17:35 Re: ppc: fsel, min, max Aldy Hernandez
17:33 Re: Bug on PA-RISC Joern Rennecke
17:06 Re: Bug on PA-RISC Joern Rennecke
15:58 Re: Reducing RTL allocations David S. Miller
13:47 Re: ppc: fsel, min, max David Edelsohn
12:53 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Joel Sherrill
10:01 Re: HELP - gcc package install Alexandre Oliva
10:00 Re: libgcc_s? Alexandre Oliva
09:27 Re: ARM/Thumb code generation by gcc Alexandre Oliva
09:03 Re: is predicate p? Marc Espie
08:40 Re: Reducing RTL allocations Marc Espie
08:36 Re: [BUG] new emit_*_scope funcs Jan Hubicka
08:32 Re: is_predicate_p? Gabriel Dos Reis
07:45 HELP - gcc package install Carlos Lima Dias
05:50 Re: is_predicate_p? Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:31 libgcc_s? Howard Chu
04:27 Re: 24 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-07T23:31:42Z. Gabriel Dos Reis
04:13 Re: 24 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-07T23:31:42Z. Joseph S. Myers
03:48 Re: is_predicate_p? Robert Dewar
03:44 Re: is_predicate_p? Jason Merrill
03:42 Re: is_predicate_p? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:36 Re: is_predicate_p? Richard Kenner
03:20 Re: 24 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-07T23:31:42Z. Gabriel Dos Reis
03:19 Re: is_predicate_p? Robert Dewar
02:55 Re: 24 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-07T23:31:42Z. Joseph S. Myers
02:47 Re: 24 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-07T23:31:42Z. Gabriel Dos Reis
02:43 ppc: fsel, min, max Aldy Hernandez
02:36 Re: 24 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-07T23:31:42Z. Joseph S. Myers
01:28 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Arnaud Charlet
01:11 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Nathanael Nerode
00:51 is_predicate_p? Jason Merrill
00:17 [BUG] new emit_*_scope funcs David S. Miller

June 07, 2002
21:30 Re: 24 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-07T23:31:42Z. Eric Christopher
20:08 Re: 24 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-07T23:31:42Z. Andrew Pinski
19:35 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Dewar
19:29 Re: target removal... Robert Dewar
17:52 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... mike stump
17:13 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Joseph S. Myers
16:39 Re: The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Fergus Henderson
15:44 Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf) H}kan Hjort
15:15 Re: gengtype.c Tim Josling
14:31 The perennial i386 floating-point rounding issue... Zack Weinberg
13:56 Re: target removal... Eric Christopher
13:45 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Joe Buck
13:35 Linux kernel miscompile due to clobbered MEM_SIZE Ulrich Weigand
13:28 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 mike stump
13:05 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
12:52 Re: [RFC] Kill gen_sequence law
12:47 Re: Using the DFA scheduler for a new VLIW port law
12:43 Re: Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Re: What toinclude in a bugreport related to boostrapping?) David Edelsohn
12:12 Re: [RFC] Kill gen_sequence Jan Hubicka
12:07 Re: [RFC] Kill gen_sequence law
11:52 Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Re: What toinclude in a bugreport related to boostrapping?) Alexander Klein
11:52 Problems bootstrapping on m68k-unknown-netbsd1.5.1 (Re: What toinclude in a bugreport related to boostrapping?) Alexander Klein
11:48 Re: target removal... Phil Edwards
11:31 Re: target removal... Eric Christopher
11:26 Re: target removal... Ricardo Anguiano
10:59 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Rainer Orth
10:56 Re: target removal... Jack Howarth
10:22 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Robert Dewar
10:06 Re: A couple of FORTRAN porting questions for g77 Janis Johnson
10:03 Re: GCC Binaries Download site for AIX David Edelsohn
09:57 Re: gcc 3.1 seems to be much slower then 3.0 in some cases Marco Morandini
09:53 GCC Binaries Download site for AIX Nigel Griffiths
09:45 Re: target removal... Rainer Orth
09:45 Re: new AIX builds Janis Johnson
09:37 Re: target removal... Robert Dewar
09:27 Re: Using the DFA scheduler for a new VLIW port Janis Johnson
09:12 c/6957: Internal compiler error in failed_reload, at reload1.c:5050 Gerald Pfeifer
08:52 A couple of FORTRAN porting questions for g77 Howard Chiger, hchiger@ttinet.
08:46 ARM/Thumb code generation by gcc Arvind Krishnaswamy
08:30 Re: Using the DFA scheduler for a new VLIW port law
08:19 Using the DFA scheduler for a new VLIW port Dan Towner
08:06 gcc 3.1 seems to be much slower then 3.0 in some cases Christian Leber
06:50 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Marc Espie
06:34 Re: link failed in online doc Toon Moene
06:26 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Geert Bosch
06:15 static inline functions in fp-bit Dan Towner
05:35 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Andreas Schwab
05:23 Re: GCC error ? Tim Prince
04:59 new AIX builds Dan Million
04:15 gnat on OpenBSD-i386, binary packages Marc Espie
03:07 Re: target removal... Rainer Orth
02:47 Re: target removal... Marc Espie
01:37 Re: target removal... Gerald Pfeifer
00:54 gcc 3.1 + gdb 5.2 not working in Cygwin Dylan Cuthbert
00:40 GCC error ? Hans-Joachim.Schmidt

June 06, 2002
23:11 Re: gcc 3.0.4 miscompiles cppexp.c (was Re: Mainline fails to build) Neil Booth
23:01 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Gareth Pearce
22:40 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Mark Mitchell
22:07 Re: Speeing up __cxa_atexit Phil Edwards
22:03 Re: target removal... Eric Christopher
21:54 Re: Speeing up __cxa_atexit Mark Mitchell
21:32 Re: target removal... Tim Prince
21:18 Re: target removal... Tim Prince
21:16 Re: gcc-3.1 RPM for RH7.2 anyone? Alexandre Oliva
19:26 Re: target removal... Zack Weinberg
19:22 Re: target removal... Robert Dewar
19:08 Re: target removal... David S. Miller
18:30 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Robert Dewar
18:12 Re: target removal... Eric Christopher
18:02 Re: target removal... Zack Weinberg
18:00 Re: target removal... Eric Christopher
17:50 Re: target removal... Jason R Thorpe
17:41 target removal... Eric Christopher
17:31 Re: floating point war casualty list Robert Dewar
17:01 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Dewar
16:25 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Eric Christopher
16:05 gcc 3.0.4 miscompiles cppexp.c (was Re: Mainline fails to build) Jason Merrill
16:04 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Joe Buck
15:47 Re: link failed in online doc Joseph S. Myers
15:30 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
15:30 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Dewar
15:28 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Dewar
15:27 Re: floating point war casualty list Toon Moene
15:26 Re: link failed in online doc Toon Moene
15:22 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Dewar
13:43 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Michael Matz
13:39 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Jan Hubicka
13:04 alphaev67 compilation error with basic gcc-3_0-branch bemis
11:49 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Dewar
11:39 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Matthew Wilcox
11:31 WEb Page Updates - Ports david
11:23 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Dan Nicolaescu
11:05 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
11:05 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
11:05 Re: Speeing up __cxa_atexit Gabriel Dos Reis
11:05 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 John David Anglin
10:58 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? root
10:57 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Gabriel Dos Reis
10:50 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Daniel Jacobowitz
10:49 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
10:46 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
10:21 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
10:12 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
10:10 Re: PATCH: Add --enable-__cxa_atexit H . J . Lu
10:09 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Neil Booth
10:08 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
10:06 Re: PATCH: Add --enable-__cxa_atexit Jakub Jelinek
10:02 Re: PATCH: Add --enable-__cxa_atexit H . J . Lu
10:02 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
09:59 Re: PATCH: Add --enable-__cxa_atexit Jack Howarth
09:52 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Nathanael Nerode
09:51 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
09:41 Speeing up __cxa_atexit Mark Mitchell
09:40 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Marc Espie
09:40 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
09:37 link failed in online doc Alex Finch
09:29 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
09:27 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
09:01 Re: gcc-3.1 RPM for RH7.2 anyone? Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
08:46 Re: gcc-3.1 RPM for RH7.2 anyone? Craig Rodrigues
08:37 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Joe Buck
08:33 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] law
08:31 gcc-3.1 RPM for RH7.2 anyone? Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:13 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] cgd
08:04 c++ calling convention guilherme
07:59 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Daniel Berlin
07:54 Re: floating point war casualty list Roman Lechtchinsky
07:27 Re: gnat cross-compiles ? Andreas Schwab
07:08 Re: floating point war casualty list Paul Koning
07:00 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
06:52 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
06:51 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Marc Espie
06:47 gnat cross-compiles ? Marc Espie
06:35 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? Michael Matz
06:33 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Marc Espie
06:32 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Paul Koning
06:05 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
05:43 Re: floating point war casualty list Roman Lechtchinsky
05:43 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Albert Chin
05:30 Re: Updating INSN_STMT records. Richard Henderson
05:12 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? Marc Espie
04:56 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Marc Espie
04:35 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed David S. Miller
04:34 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Jan Hubicka
04:33 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Jan Hubicka
04:16 Re: floating point war casualty list Robert Dewar
02:59 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] Phil Edwards
02:14 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] Dominic Sweetman
01:58 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] Dominic Sweetman
01:40 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Geoff Keating
01:26 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Geoff Keating
00:10 Re: Stray "cxxtest" processes Zack Weinberg

June 05, 2002
23:31 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] cgd
23:30 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Lipe
23:18 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
23:12 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
23:10 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 David S. Miller
23:10 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 David S. Miller
23:03 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Lipe
23:02 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
22:57 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 David S. Miller
22:54 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
22:48 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
22:35 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed law
22:18 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
22:18 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 David S. Miller
22:16 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed David S. Miller
22:15 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Lipe
22:00 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Daniel Jacobowitz
21:58 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? Alexandre Oliva
21:51 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
20:50 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? Bryce McKinlay
20:40 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Vladimir N. Makarov
20:37 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Alexandre Oliva
20:22 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex Geoff Keating
19:59 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:37 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex David Edelsohn
19:27 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex Geoff Keating
19:24 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 David S. Miller
19:03 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
18:59 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
18:28 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Dan Nicolaescu
18:12 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:40 Re: Bug on PA-RISC John David Anglin
16:22 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Eric Christopher
16:14 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? David S. Miller
16:12 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed David S. Miller
16:04 combine.c handling of SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED Clarke, Stephen
15:55 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? Alexandre Oliva
15:52 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la David S. Miller
15:46 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? David S. Miller
15:37 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Vladimir Makarov
15:30 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed David S. Miller
15:18 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Alexandre Oliva
15:14 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Joe Buck
14:50 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Jeff Sturm
14:49 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Russ Allbery
14:49 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Eric Christopher
14:46 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Alexandre Oliva
14:43 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
14:43 Re: Traditional macro recursion Zack Weinberg
14:38 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Neil Booth
14:35 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 David Edelsohn
14:33 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
14:24 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Kelley Cook
14:22 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Robert Lipe
14:13 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Vladimir Makarov
14:07 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
14:05 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Alexandre Oliva
14:03 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed law
14:01 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Neil Booth
14:01 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law
14:01 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 George.R.Goffe
14:00 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
13:55 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
13:53 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Dan Nicolaescu
13:53 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Alexandre Oliva
13:48 Re: Bug on PA-RISC John David Anglin
13:43 Problems building GCC 3.1 on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 Clarke, Carus V
13:36 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law
13:33 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8) H . J . Lu
13:31 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Joseph S. Myers
13:30 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 law
13:24 Re: Traditional macro recursion Neil Booth
13:22 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Daniel Berlin
13:19 Re: __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining DJ Delorie
13:16 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Alexandre Oliva
13:15 Re: Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Neil Booth
13:13 Traditional macro recursion Neil Booth
13:04 Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90 Stan Shebs
12:59 RE: Update to host installation notes for GCC on Win2K Ed Maste
12:43 __builtin_return_address (0) and inlining Eric Christopher
12:32 Re: Regression? HPUX/OS X linker problems (was: Static variables in templates} John David Anglin
12:28 Re: Update to host installation notes for GCC on Win2K Janis Johnson
12:23 PCH merge bootstrap failure on systems without flex Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:21 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? Alexandre Oliva
12:01 Re: floating point war casualty list Toon Moene
11:52 Re: Regression? HPUX/OS X linker problems (was: Static variables in templates} Ravikiran Rajagopal
11:11 Re: [PATCH] automated demangling styles list. H . J . Lu
10:57 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] Daniel Jacobowitz
10:16 Update to host installation notes for GCC on Win2K Jeff Russell
09:47 sh3e (Was: Re: make sh-1 support in gcc obsolete?) Joern Rennecke
09:36 Re: Bug on PA-RISC John David Anglin
09:26 Re: bootstrap failure, linux, today's mainline Jan Hubicka
09:25 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law
09:20 bootstrap failure, linux, today's mainline Paul Koning
09:02 Re: I like the current gcc handling of trigraphs Robert Dewar
09:01 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] law
08:59 I like the current gcc handling of trigraphs Thomas R. Truscott
08:40 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] Dominic Sweetman
08:23 Bootstrap failure for GCC 3.1 with Solaris 2.7 (some patchlevels) Dave Morgan
08:14 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] Dominic Sweetman
07:40 Re: Updating INSN_STMT records. Jan Hubicka
06:48 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Vladimir N. Makarov
05:34 Re: floating point war casualty list Stephen L Moshier
05:26 Re: gcc 3.1 hangs forever on Red Hat 7.2 system Reichelt
04:56 Re: libtool sending output to /dev/null [Was: Re: GCC build failedfor native with your patch on 2002-06-02T22:30:03Z.] Andreas Schwab
04:37 Re: Speeding up GC Robert Dewar
03:03 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la Michael Matz
03:03 RE: Assembler errors with project for a Nios Joost van der Weerden
02:51 RE: Assembler errors with project for a Nios Bobby McNulty Junior
02:48 Assembler errors with project for a Nios Joost van der Weerden
01:30 Re: build failure in libgcj Jan Hubicka
00:16 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers Joseph S. Myers
00:14 RE: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Bobby McNulty Junior
00:06 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Dan Nicolaescu

June 04, 2002
22:57 Re: gcc 3.1 hangs forever on Red Hat 7.2 system Jakub Jelinek
22:52 Re: gcc 3.1 hangs forever on Red Hat 7.2 system H . J . Lu
22:14 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers Tim_Josling
21:39 gcc 3.1 hangs forever on Red Hat 7.2 system Andy Tai
21:20 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers Geoff Keating
20:37 Re: Stray "cxxtest" processes Tom Tromey
20:27 Re: Stray "cxxtest" processes Zack Weinberg
20:15 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers Tim_Josling
19:13 Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed David S. Miller
18:38 3.2 vs 3.1 speed Dan Nicolaescu
17:20 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8) H . J . Lu
17:11 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Tom Tromey
16:43 Re: Bug on PA-RISC John David Anglin
16:36 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law
16:27 Re: Bug on PA-RISC John David Anglin
16:12 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law
15:54 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8) H . J . Lu
15:41 A question of assemblers Mark Butcher
15:32 Re: Bug on PA-RISC John David Anglin
15:30 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Tom Tromey
15:20 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law
15:09 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la David S. Miller
15:07 Re: PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la David S. Miller
15:03 PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8) H . J . Lu
15:02 Re: Successful build of gcc 3.1 on Solaris 2.6 Janis Johnson
15:00 Re: check fails because of gcc test Eric Christopher
14:57 Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
14:53 Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
14:51 Re: Bug on PA-RISC John David Anglin
14:39 Re: Building 3.1 on Tru64 UNIX 4.0D Albert Chin
14:24 Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
14:14 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law
14:10 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? H . J . Lu
14:06 Re: Why long command line for libgcj.so? David S. Miller
14:04 libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
13:59 Re: Bug on PA-RISC John David Anglin
13:55 Why long command line for libgcj.so? H . J . Lu
13:53 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass David S. Miller
13:43 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass law
13:33 Re: gcc 3.2 c++ deceleration Karel Gardas
13:29 Successful build of gcc 3.1 on Solaris 2.6 Adrian Pasciuta
13:20 Re: build failure in libgcj Tom Tromey
13:19 Re: check fails because of gcc test Jan Hubicka
13:14 check fails because of gcc test bemis
12:54 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass David S. Miller
12:49 Re: build failure in libgcj Jan Hubicka
12:44 Re: gcc 3.2 c++ deceleration Karel Gardas
12:43 Re: Bug on PA-RISC law
12:39 Re: gcc 3.2 c++ deceleration Jan Hubicka
12:38 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
12:36 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
12:34 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Daniel Berlin
12:34 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass John David Anglin
12:27 Re: gcc 3.2 c++ deceleration Kelley Cook
12:26 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Phil Edwards
12:23 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass law
12:23 build failure in libgcj Tom Tromey
12:10 gcc 3.2 c++ deceleration Karel Gardas
11:48 Re: Speeding up GC Richard Henderson
11:42 Re: Stray "cxxtest" processes Tom Tromey
11:41 Re: Speeding up GC Alexandre Oliva
10:56 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
10:53 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Jan Hubicka
10:46 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Diego Novillo
10:35 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Jan Hubicka
10:32 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Diego Novillo
10:22 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Jan Hubicka
10:15 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
10:12 Re: Speeding up GC Richard Henderson
10:03 how to upgrade from 3.04 to 3.1 Christian Hinkelbein
09:59 Re: Speeding up GC Richard Henderson
09:35 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Joseph S. Myers
09:33 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
09:21 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Joe Buck
09:19 Re: Speeding up GC Joe Buck
09:05 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Diego Novillo
09:04 Re: Speeding up GC Marc Espie
08:59 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Jan Hubicka
08:58 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
08:55 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
08:46 Re: Speeding up GC law
08:43 Re: Mainline does not bootstrap for more than a week (Re: Newest gcc memory leak on gdb (heads up, only)) law
08:39 Re: Speeding up GC law
08:30 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Phil Edwards
08:24 Re: gcc3.1 and 3DNOW prefetch Janis Johnson
08:17 [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive Diego Novillo
08:13 Re: Speeding up GC Marc Espie
08:10 Re: Mainline does not bootstrap for more than a week (Re: Newestgcc memory leak on gdb (heads up, only)) Andreas Schwab
08:08 Re: Speeding up GC Marc Espie
07:58 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
07:53 Re: Speeding up GC Andi Kleen
07:51 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
07:45 Re: Speeding up GC Daniel Berlin
07:37 How can I... Antoine Llorens
07:28 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
07:14 Re: Solaris2.7 installation problem (other problems...) David S. Miller
07:05 Re: Speeding up GC Paul Koning
06:57 Re: cc1plus: out of memory allocation. Karel Gardas
06:53 Re: Speeding up GC John Levon
06:42 cc1plus: out of memory allocation. Karel Gardas
06:40 Re: Solaris2.7 installation problem (other problems...) Alan Lehotsky
06:28 Re: Explanation of compiler warnings and errors John Levon
06:14 Solaris2.7 installation problem Michael.Couren
06:05 Re: gcc 3.1 question Phil Edwards
05:57 Re: re-building gcc 3.1 on cross-x86-ARM failing Philip Blundell
05:35 gnu/types.h Rehab El Kharboutly
05:35 gnu/types.h Rehab El Kharboutly
05:34 gnu/types.h Rehab El Kharboutly
05:31 Re: unable to build glibc-2.2.5 with gcc-3.1 for ARM jeroen dobbelaere
05:17 re-building gcc 3.1 on cross-x86-ARM failing Josh Fryman
05:15 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds Robert Dewar
05:13 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds Robert Dewar
04:36 PATCH for Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return Gerald Pfeifer
04:28 Re: Significantly smaller binary sizes today Gerald Pfeifer
04:27 RE: Succsessfull GCC 3.1 with Cygwin and GNAT Nicholas Wourms
04:12 Re: gcc 3.1 question Gerald Pfeifer
04:00 gcc 3.1 question Ilan Finci
03:52 Re: mainline: ada/Makefile broken? Andreas Jaeger
03:42 Re: Speeding up GC Andi Kleen
03:15 Re: libtool sending output to /dev/null [Was: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2002-06-02T22:30:03Z.] Marc Espie
03:00 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
02:34 mainline: ada/Makefile broken? Andreas Jaeger
02:20 Re: Speeding up GC Marc Espie
02:16 Re: gcc3.1 and 3DNOW prefetch Jan Hubicka
02:15 Mainline does not bootstrap for more than a week (Re: Newest gccmemory leak on gdb (heads up, only)) Andreas Schwab
02:15 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Marc Espie
00:49 Re: Significantly smaller binary sizes today Brad Roberts
00:49 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Joe Buck
00:09 RE: Short Displacement Problems. Naveen Sharma, Noida

June 03, 2002
23:53 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Ross Smith
23:46 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Fergus Henderson
23:41 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds Kai Henningsen
23:36 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Fergus Henderson
22:57 Explanation of compiler warnings and errors Yusuf Pisan
22:54 Re: Timing the compiler Aldy Hernandez
22:51 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Joe Buck
22:42 Re: looking for a proof for every optimizier flag (c/c++) Tim Prince
22:19 RE: ASM_OUTPUT_SECTION_NAME cleanup patch problem Anita Kulkarni
22:14 Re: DECL_RTL vs. explicit make_decl_rtl calls Mark Mitchell
21:27 RE: Succsessfull GCC 3.1 with Cygwin and GNAT Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
21:25 Re: gcc for HPUX 10.20 law
20:29 Re: Regression? HPUX/OS X linker problems (was: Static variables in templates} John David Anglin
20:02 Re: gcc for HPUX 10.20 Tim Prince
19:34 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:30 gcc3.1 and 3DNOW prefetch Tom Crispin
19:12 Re: ASM_OUTPUT_SECTION_NAME cleanup patch problem Richard Henderson
19:03 gcc-ss-20020603 is now available gccadmin
18:21 Re: Do boehm-gc and libffi work on IRIX? H . J . Lu
18:11 Re: Timing the compiler Richard Henderson
18:10 RE: Do boehm-gc and libffi work on IRIX? Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
18:05 Re: Speeding up GC Richard Henderson
17:48 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
17:30 If you like Alice in Chains or hard rock then check out this band NOW Vez
17:09 Re: ASM_OUTPUT_SECTION_NAME cleanup patch problem Joern Rennecke
16:12 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Neil Booth
16:08 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Russ Allbery
16:02 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Russ Allbery
15:24 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Joe Buck
15:24 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merged mainline into branch as of 2002-06-02 Diego Novillo
14:38 Regression? HPUX/OS X linker problems (was: Static variables in templates} Ravikiran Rajagopal
13:32 RE: Group identifier of a comdat group Jessica Han
13:25 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.1 Janis Johnson
13:06 Successfull build of gcc 3.1 Jean-Marc Bourguet
12:39 Re: gcc for HPUX 10.20 Peter Barada
12:35 gcc for HPUX 10.20 Ferreira, Jason C.
11:29 Re: vax double precision broken John David Anglin
11:27 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? mike stump
11:27 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Marc Espie
11:16 Re: RFC: eliminate some dead stores Joe Buck
10:55 alpha fails building toolchain Dzung Nguyen
10:28 Re: gcc 3.1 build status Janis Johnson
10:27 Re: gcc 3.1 build on hppa 1.1 hpux10.20 Janis Johnson
10:23 Re: GCC 3.1 on Mandrake 8.1: successful build Janis Johnson
10:11 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins Richard Henderson
10:07 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libsupc++ on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Jan Hubicka
10:06 Re: Updating INSN_STMT records. Jan Hubicka
09:57 Re: Updating INSN_STMT records. Richard Henderson
09:48 Re: Updating INSN_STMT records. Jan Hubicka
09:39 Re: RFC: eliminate some dead stores Joe Buck
09:37 3.2 bootstrap failure in libsupc++ on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
09:26 Re: floating point war casualty list Stephen L Moshier
09:21 Re: Updating INSN_STMT records. Richard Henderson
09:20 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
08:23 Re: Why is _Jv_RegisterClasses in libstdc++.so? Phil Edwards
08:14 Re: Do boehm-gc and libffi work on IRIX? Jeff Sturm
08:09 Re: Why is _Jv_RegisterClasses in libstdc++.so? Jeff Sturm
08:07 Re: Error in INSN_ADDRESSES (INSN_UID (get_last_insn ())) Jan Hubicka
08:04 Updating INSN_STMT records. Jan Hubicka
08:01 Re: Why is _Jv_RegisterClasses in libstdc++.so? Tom Tromey
08:00 Re: Why is _Jv_RegisterClasses in libstdc++.so? Andreas Schwab
07:55 Re: Do boehm-gc and libffi work on IRIX? Tom Tromey
07:52 Error in INSN_ADDRESSES (INSN_UID (get_last_insn ())) Marek Michalkiewicz
07:18 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? Daniel Jacobowitz
07:13 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:07 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Wheeler, Fred (Research)
07:03 Why is _Jv_RegisterClasses in libstdc++.so? Phil Edwards
06:39 Re: Speeding up GC David S. Miller
06:25 Timing the compiler Martin v. Löwis
06:25 Speeding up GC Martin v. Löwis
06:21 Re: Trying to Eliminate Warning Message Bill Trautman
06:19 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Phil Edwards
06:07 Re: looking for a proof for every optimizier flag (c/c++) Joerg Beyer
05:40 Re: looking for a proof for every optimizier flag (c/c++) Tim Prince
05:27 gcc 3.1 build status Ed Hynan
05:23 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Neil Booth
05:18 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Joseph S. Myers
04:35 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Phil Edwards
04:22 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? Daniel Berlin
04:04 looking for a proof for every optimizier flag (c/c++) Joerg Beyer
04:00 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers Michael Matz
03:52 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Joseph S. Myers
03:51 gcc 3.1 build on hppa 1.1 hpux10.20 Morten Sickel
03:50 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins Falk Hueffner
03:26 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Phil Edwards
03:16 RE: ASM_OUTPUT_SECTION_NAME cleanup patch problem Rekha Deshmukh
03:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on ia64 Jan Hubicka
03:09 Mainline bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
02:56 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ? Russ Allbery
02:44 Re: Your Change to integrate.c at Sun Jun 2 22:56:48 CEST 2002 Jan Hubicka
02:19 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regressionfor ppc? Gerald Pfeifer
00:48 Rename -W to -Wextra ? Phil Edwards
00:38 RFC: eliminate some dead stores Dan Nicolaescu

June 02, 2002
23:39 Libgcc2 compilation umar janjua
23:32 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
23:30 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? Jakub Jelinek
23:20 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins Richard Henderson
23:15 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regressionfor ppc? Gerald Pfeifer
23:10 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? H . J . Lu
23:03 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
23:03 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? H . J . Lu
22:52 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins Aldy Hernandez
22:48 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Zack Weinberg
22:42 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? H . J . Lu
22:23 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
22:18 GCC 3.1 on Mandrake 8.1: successful build David Shepperton
22:09 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:07 Thank You for your e-mail (KMM577744C0KM) ESD Customer Service
22:05 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? H . J . Lu
22:01 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? Daniel Jacobowitz
21:19 Re: Group identifier of a comdat group Alan Modra
20:54 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
20:16 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
19:57 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
19:57 Do boehm-gc and libffi work on IRIX? H . J . Lu
19:48 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins Richard Henderson
19:47 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins Richard Henderson
19:46 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
19:43 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? H . J . Lu
18:59 Re: make sh-1 support in gcc obsolete? Joel Sherrill
18:50 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Kevin B. Hendricks
18:49 Your Change to integrate.c at Sun Jun 2 22:56:48 CEST 2002 Andrew Pinski
18:46 Re: make sh-1 support in gcc obsolete? Anthony Green
18:42 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins Aldy Hernandez
18:42 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
18:23 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Kevin B. Hendricks
18:13 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
18:00 Re: Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? Daniel Jacobowitz
17:46 [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Kevin B. Hendricks
17:20 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins Falk Hueffner
16:28 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
16:21 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Zack Weinberg
16:06 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
15:45 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
15:11 Re: BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
14:36 Does gdb 5.2 support gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mips? H . J . Lu
14:31 BUG? -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
13:29 Bootstrap error on i686-pc-linux-gnu Paolo Carlini
13:04 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Zack Weinberg
12:39 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
12:24 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Zack Weinberg
11:57 Re: Does libjava support cross compiling to glibc? Geoff Keating
11:51 Re: [rfa:ppc] Fix PPC/NBSD struct return; Was: userdef.exp regression for ppc? Jason R Thorpe
11:45 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu with checking enabled Richard Henderson
11:00 Re: Where can i find libstdc++.so.2.10.0 Alexandre Oliva
10:50 Re: why debian uses --use-cxa-atexit Nathan Sidwell
10:46 Does libjava support cross compiling to glibc? H . J . Lu
10:05 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu with checking enabled Jan Hubicka
10:02 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu with checking enabled Jakub Jelinek
07:00 Re: floating point war casualty list Robert Dewar
06:51 Re: floating point war casualty list Toon Moene
06:26 In Search Of The One True Zero. Toon Moene
06:09 Re: floating point war casualty list Robert Dewar
06:00 Re: floating point war casualty list Stephen L Moshier
05:13 EN EL VERANO ESTUDIE O MEJORE SUS IDIOMAS LONDON LANGUAGE INSTITUTE
05:13 EN EL VERANO ESTUDIE O MEJORE SUS IDIOMAS LONDON LANGUAGE INSTITUTE
04:47 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu with checking enabled Andreas Jaeger
03:20 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu with checking enabled Jan Hubicka
01:05 Bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu with checking enabled Andreas Jaeger

June 01, 2002
22:15 Re: why debian uses --use-cxa-atexit Jakub Jelinek
21:20 Re: Commit policy wrt. to-be-obsolete targets Richard Henderson
21:19 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
19:18 Re: cxa-atexit again H . J . Lu
18:36 cxa-atexit again Jack Howarth
17:01 Re: vax double precision broken Joe Buck
16:21 why debian uses --use-cxa-atexit Jack Howarth
15:01 to use_cxa_atexit or not to use_cxa_atexit Jack Howarth
12:36 Re: vax double precision broken Paul Koning
12:08 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers Andreas Schwab
10:15 Who are the reload/regalloc maintainers? Alan Lehotsky
09:37 Re: Stray "cxxtest" processes Gordon Sadler
09:09 Don't read, is a proof to see whether the list works G. Ballester Valor


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.5