This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...

From: Matthijs van Duin <matthijs at cds dot nl>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Magnus Fromreide <magfr at lysator dot liu dot se>,Craig Newell <craign at ieee dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 23:38:26 +0200
Subject: Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0205241229270.27466-100000@proton.lysator.liu.se><v04220807b913c7672745@[194.134.44.75]> <20020524143614.D27355@redhat.com>

At 14:36 -0700 24-05-2002, Richard Henderson wrote:
>This is i386.  You should be using the "a" constraint for that.

Hey hey, indeed! :-)

Thanks a lot,

  - xmath


Matthijs van Duin     (NOTE: PGP key has changed!)
- PGP Key: 0x2D6F0BA7
- FP: 205D F7BA FFAD 9070 AB9E  C5A8 BDB0 CA1B 2D6F 0BA7 -

References:
- Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
  - From: Magnus Fromreide
- Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
  - From: Matthijs van Duin
- Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]