This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums

From: Kurt Wall <kwall at kurtwerks dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, anuchit aromsawa <anuchitz at hotmail dot com>, gcc at gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 20:59:52 -0400
Subject: Re: Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums
References: <F1053pdbddRWhDUWdlU00017723@hotmail.com> <20020516101606.J1829@us.ibm.com> <20020516194234.B11265@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

Scribbling feverishly on May 16, Jakub Jelinek managed to emit:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:16:06AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > > BUT  the corresponding manpages is of the Red hat bundle.
> > > How could I get   the GCC 3.1 (gcc,g77,..) manpages
> > 
> > Can someone else answer this?  The install should have put them in
> > /usr/man.
> 
> And that's exactly the problem.
> Red Hat uses /usr/share/man and /usr/share/info (as required by LSB, FHS
> etc.). So one has to at least pass different mandir and infodir to
> configury.

Indeed. Any LSB or FHS compliant system will require --mandir and
--infodir in order to install manual and Texinfo pages into the correct
locations (where "correct" means LSB/FHS compliant).

Kurt
-- 
"Of ______course it's the murder weapon.  Who would frame someone with a
fake?"

References:
- Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums
  - From: anuchit aromsawa
- Re: Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]