This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc compile-time performance

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
To: Jeremy Sanders <jss at ast dot cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 19:28:12 +0100
Subject: Re: gcc compile-time performance
References: <20020518122909.33441F2A59@nile.gnat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205181410210.15346-100000@xpc1.ast.cam.ac.uk>

Jeremy Sanders wrote:-

> I'd just be nice for gcc to be faster if that wasn't too hard to do! Maybe
> precompiled headers would make a significant difference. Perhaps gcc
> developers would like to get gcc's internals in a better state before
> going down this line.

Yes, the thing that scares me most about PCH is that it will make it
a lot easier to ignore GCC compile-time performance.  I hope we get
a lot of stuff cleaned up before they come in.

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc compile-time performance
  - From: Stan Shebs

References:
- Re: gcc compile-time performance
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: gcc compile-time performance
  - From: Jeremy Sanders

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]