This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 03:59, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 30, 2002, Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> wrote: > > Probably related to my patch to merge the weak declarations better. Can > > you run (if you have tcl/expect/dejagnu installed) > > > > make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=weak-*.c" > > > > in your builddir? Or someone else on this platforms? Please post the > > resulting gcc.log then. > > Here's the only failure I got from weak-*.c tests: > > output is: > /home/aoliva/src/tool/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak-5.c:42: warning: weak > declaration of `vfoo1c' after first use results in unspecified behavior > /home/aoliva/src/tool/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak-5.c:114: warning: only > weak aliases are supported in this configuration > > PASS: gcc.dg/weak-5.c weak declaration (test for warnings, line 42) > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-5.c (test for excess errors) > Excess errors: > /home/aoliva/src/tool/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak-5.c:114: warning: only > weak aliases are supported in this configuration Can you try if the attached patch fixes it for you? Now that more stuff is put on the weak_decls list, the check for duplicates needs to be better. Running a bootstrap now. BTW, wondering about this assembler error, does this symbol end up as weak in misc-inst.o? On linux readelf tells me: 809: 00000000 4 OBJECT WEAK DEFAULT 1410 _ZNSt15basic_streambufIcSt11char_traitsIcEE13_S_pback_sizeE Franz. * varasm.c (globalize_decl): Compare names to check for duplicates.
Attachment:
gcc-weaksym-8.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |