This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
- From: "Dana, Eric" <Eric_Dana at bmc dot com>
- To: "'Jason Merrill'" <jason at redhat dot com>, "'Janis Johnson'" <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:37:11 -0500
- Subject: RE: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
Jason,
Please do not remove i?86-sequent-sysv4*. We are currently using it
at my company. Also, I maintain the compiler for my company and will
sending a patch for 3.1.1 support (rather trivial).
FYI: we have gcc 3.0.4 running on DYNIX 4.4.2 - 4.6.1 using 2 local
patches.
--Eric--
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Merrill [mailto:jason@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:51 PM
To: Janis Johnson
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
>>>>> "Janis" == Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com> writes:
>> i?86-sequent-sysv3*
>> i?86-sequent-sysv4*
>> i?86-sequent-bsd*
>> i?86-sequent-ptx1*
>> i?86-sequent-ptx2*
> These can probably all be dropped. Most of them are for operating
> systems that Sequent stopped supporting many years ago.
Ah, Dynix; my first work on the GNU tools was porting various bits to
i386-sequent-bsd for the CS Dept's 4-way Symmetry. But that was a long
time ago...
Jason