This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:08:40 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
References: <5.1.1.2.2.20020423130143.04a21008@mail.lauterbach.com> <5.1.1.2.2.20020423190859.04dc6b88@mail.lauterbach.com> <20020423110433.A728@redhat.com> <200204240003.42142@enzo.bigblue.local>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:03:42AM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> (declare_weak wasn't called for VAR_DECLs before)

Huh?  It must have been.

> ... and judging from the comments in tree.h it looks like 
> TREE_ASM_WRITTEN has a slightly different meaning for a VAR_DECL.

What makes you think that?

> I don't think we want a warning here for strtod?

I can make an argument either way.  I'm inclined to warn, since
older gcc would in fact render this into rtl right away, which 
has then already made decisions based on DECL_WEAK.

r~

References:
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]