This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File
- From: Chip Cuntz <chipperc dot cuntz at wcom dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:21:39 -0600
- Subject: RE: 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File
- Reply-to: chipperc dot cuntz at wcom dot com
This does not sound like desired behavior!
Is there any easy way to weed out which header files need to go and which
header files need to stay?
Chip
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr
> [mailto:Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr]On Behalf Of Gabriel Dos
> Reis
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:39 PM
> To: David Edelsohn
> Cc: chipperc.cuntz@wcom.com; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File
>
>
> David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | GCC 3.1 libstdc++-v3 does not install a header file named
> | basic_file_mode.h, although GCC 3.0 does. I suspect that your GCC 3.1
> | compiler may be finding a previously installed GCC 3.0 header files.
>
> Ooch, which reminds me that I proposed versioned header files. Oh,
> I'm going to finish the std::rel_ops issue first, then we'll see what
> comes next...
>
> -- Gaby