This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Stephen Clarke <Stephen dot Clarke at st dot com>
- Cc: vmakarov at redhat dot com, geoffk at geoffk dot org, dberlin at dberlin dot org, tm at mail dot kloo dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, vmakarov at cygnus dot com
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:30:04 -0600
- Subject: Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <3CB4A0AB.F3F4D76F@st.com>, Stephen Clarke writes:
> vmakarov@redhat.com wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Geoff. I'll do it. I think that I could finish it in week.
>
> For which targets do you plan to enable DFA scheduling?
>
> IIRC, the SH-4 specific work was done by Noida, so will that
> be a separate patch once the main DFA patch has been accepted? Or
> will you include it in your patch?
Also note I'll contribute my PA7100 DFA definition (generates 100% identical
code when compared to existing scheduler definition) and my PA8000 DFA
definition which generates slightly better code than the existing scheduler
definition. I have not had time to track down a PA7100LC machine for testing
a PA7100LC description.
jeff