This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?

From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
To: Stephen Clarke <Stephen dot Clarke at st dot com>
Cc: geoffk at geoffk dot org, dberlin at dberlin dot org, tm at mail dot kloo dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, vmakarov at cygnus dot com
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:39:22 -0400
Subject: Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204101400270.4068-100000@dberlin.org> <jm662zo0t0.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <3CB48AB6.C3A6F3A5@redhat.com> <3CB4A0AB.F3F4D76F@st.com>

Stephen Clarke wrote:
> 
> vmakarov@redhat.com wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Geoff.  I'll do it.  I think that I could finish it in week.
> 
> For which targets do you plan to enable DFA scheduling?
> 
> IIRC, the SH-4 specific work was done by Noida, so will that
> be a separate patch once the main DFA patch has been accepted?  Or
> will you include it in your patch?

The patch will include all code added into the branch (I asked
permission to merge the branch).  Currently, it is dfa-based scheduler
itself and code (dfa descriptions) to use dfa-scheduler for ultrasparc
and sh4.

Vlad

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
  - From: David S. Miller

References:
- Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
  - From: Stephen Clarke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]