This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Cc: Nic Ferrier <nferrier at tapsellferrier dot co dot uk>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:29:11 -0500
- Subject: Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
- References: <3C78B3B6.5000303@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <87it8mbse7.fsf@tf1.tapsellferrier.co.uk> <3C797FAA.9070305@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:04:58PM +1300, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
>
> I must admit that, after a frustrating afternoon yesterday trying to
> figure out silly libjava build problems when I really wanted to do
> productive gcj hacking, I am sympathetic to RTH's recent suggestion that
> we get rid of libtool (and automake?) and instead make sure that "gcc
> -shared" knows how to build a shared library on all the platforms that
> we care about.
I would fight the removal of automake. It's been awfully darn handy for
maintaining libstdc++. (Yes, the currently-required version has its problems
with subdirs, but the current automake release seems to have fixed those.)
Libtool is completely opaque to me. I wouldn't fight its removal, but
I'm not pushing for it either. I also never use it in any of my own
projects... [maintainer hat OFF] frankly, the platforms on which libtool
is supposed to be magically helpful are platforms which IMHO need to die,
and the sooner we abandon them the better.
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams