This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: CVS and gcc trees

From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: Peter Barada <pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:49:55 +0100
Subject: Re: CVS and gcc trees
References: <200202181809.g1II9f501591@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com><200202181809.g1II9f501591@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com>

At 22:26 19.02.2002, Phil Edwards wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 01:09:41PM -0500, Peter Barada wrote:
> >
> > Note the '+' in libstdc++v3.  How does the gcc cvs repository get
> > around this limitation of cvs?  I've looked at the latest cvs source
> > (1.11.1p1) and in src/edit.c it explicitely checks for '+'.
>
>We use 1.10, with some speed modifications.

The CVS mirror subversions.gnu.org uses 1.11.1.p1 too and it seems to work 
fine for gcc. I just noticed that this version has the additional benefit 
of printing the complete path on 'cvs diff', making the pipe thru 
contrib/index-prop superflous, so I want that cvs version on gcc.gnu.org 
too :-).

Franz.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CVS and gcc trees
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- Re: CVS and gcc trees
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: CVS and gcc trees
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]