This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz
Date: 26 Jan 2002 19:52:31 -0700
Subject: Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
References: <20020124135936.A32484@lucon.org> <87r8offa4c.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <87it9rf8og.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3C522541.2000204@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

>> This is really outside my area of expertise.  All I know is that this
>> was working fine with the Jan 4 compiler.

Bryce> Are you sure? The bug seems to occur for me going back as far
Bryce> as early December.

That's strange.  Over the last day or so I've updated and built from
scratch 4 different versions of gcc -- latest, Jan 4, Jan 20, and then
Jan 22.  All of them seemed to work for me on this build.  I don't
understand why they would work for me and fail for you :-(

Tom

References:
- libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]