This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: dj at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 02 20:53:18 EST
Subject: Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken

    I think we're back to the fundamental bug of the mode claiming to be
    DI instead of BLK - so it guesses the alignment wrong.  

Exactly.  Why do we have DImode for a type not sufficiently aligned?  Is
it because BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT is 32?

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]