This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: eon performance regression
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:30:44 +0000
- Subject: Re: eon performance regression
- References: <20020102135446.C6281@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz><3C3316C3.44324286@unitus.it> <u8k7v04vzy.fsf@gromit.moeb><3C332CCE.55954CCB@unitus.it> <u81yh84pem.fsf@gromit.moeb><wvlr8oxccm6.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><20020111122242.GE6714@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
>> Any more word on this? Is the regression still present? Have you tested
>> to see whether or not it was due to my patch?
> You may take a look at the results pages - the eon is still worse than it
> has been previously.
Ah, OK, looking at http://www.suse.de/~aj/SPEC/CINT/sandbox-b/recent.html I see
that there was about a 50-point drop in the eon score between 2001-12-15
and 2001-12-19. That's much less dramatic; I had thought you were
referring to the 300-point drop on the 29th, which was transient.
I'm still interested in what happens if you revert my patch.
> I will ask Andreas to do the testing
Thanks.
Jason