This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS
- From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gcc external <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 16 Dec 2001 20:06:09 -0800
- Subject: Re: rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS
- References: <200112170355.WAA22768@makai.watson.ibm.com>
On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 19:55, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Aldy Hernandez writes:
>
> Aldy> is there a reason why NON_SPECIAL_REGS is not the exact bit opposite of
> Aldy> SPECIAL_REGS?
>
> Aldy> { 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0x00000008, 0x00000000 }, /* NON_SPECIAL_REGS */ \
>
> Aldy> { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000007, 0x00000000 }, /* SPECIAL_REGS */ \
>
> Because the name is not accurate? It really is the union of
> GENERAL_REGS and FLOAT_REGS.
ahh, that explains my float failures when i "fix" non_special_regs.
thx
>
> David
--
Aldy Hernandez E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy
Red Hat, Inc.