This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why don't we provide a default INSTALL_SCRIPT in gcc/Makefile.in?
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, fenix at io dot com
- Date: 29 Nov 2001 02:43:10 -0200
- Subject: Re: Why don't we provide a default INSTALL_SCRIPT in gcc/Makefile.in?
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20011127112800.A31868@lucon.org>
On Nov 27, 2001, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> This patch
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-11/msg00221.html
> uses INSTALL_SCRIPT without providing a default. As the result, I
> can no longer do
> # cd gcc
> # make install
Hmm, indeed.
Would one of you please post a patch that copies the definition of:
INSTALL_SCRIPT = @INSTALL@
from the top-level Makefile.in into gcc/Makefile.in?
Thanks,
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me