This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Gcc 3.x regression in constant initializer [compile/20010327-1.c]


Stephane Carrez <Stephane.Carrez@worldnet.fr> writes:

> Hi!
> 
> I've found a regression in 3.1 compared to gcc 2.95.  The following code:
> 
> extern void _text;
> static unsigned int x = (unsigned int) &_text - 0x10000000L - 1;
> static int x1 = (int) &_text - 0x10000000L - 1;
> static long x2 = (long) &_text - 0x10000000L - 1;
> static __SIZE_TYPE__ x3 = (__SIZE_TYPE__) &_text - 0x10000000L - 1;
> 
> compiles correctly with GCC 2.95.3 on i386.  It fails with 3.1 and
> also with a `gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81)'.
> 
> The following initialization:
> 
> static unsigned int x = (unsigned int) &_text - 0x10000000L - 1;
> 
> was working with 2.95 and it fails now with:
> 
> /tmp/bug-1.c:2: initializer element is not computable at load time
> 
> 
> This problem is now in evidence after I integrated:
> 
> 2001-11-01  Stephane Carrez  <Stephane.Carrez@worldnet.fr>
> 
>        * gcc.c-torture/compile/20010327-1.c: Use __SIZE_TYPE__ instead
>         of unsigned long.
> 
> and it explains the failure for compile/20010327-1.c on i386 and ppc-eabisim
> (at least).
> 
> Until a fix is found, I suggest to keep my patch, even if it introduces new
> failures in native and ppc-eabisim validation. OK?

Please don't do that.  Instead of changing a test so that it no longer
tests what it used to test, delete the old one and create a new one
with a different name.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> <geoffk@redhat.com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]