gcc archive
author index for November, 2001

1311-Info-domains-590

• 2001-11-13 12:57 Schon registriert ? .INFO und .BIZ Domain...

$B5h(B $B8&5f=j(B

• 2001-11-27 02:48 Dont's send mail containing virus.

Danny Smith

• 2001-11-14 12:36 RE: c++ name mangling question

Aaron Schawalder

• 2001-11-04 07:36 Successfully built and installed GCC

Adam

• 2001-11-02 18:44 PSRLQ question.
• 2001-11-03 09:07 Re: PSRLQ question.

Adam Megacz

• 2001-11-26 14:50 copyright assignment papers
• 2001-11-26 14:51 assignment papers

Adrian von Bidder

• 2001-11-01 07:44 duplicate -mdisable-got with gcc-3.0
• 2001-11-01 23:27 Re: duplicate -mdisable-got with gcc-3.0
• 2001-11-05 03:15 long function calls in ARM
• 2001-11-05 04:44 Re: C and assembly listing
• 2001-11-06 07:34 Is SYMBOL_REF in code or in data section?
• 2001-11-07 03:03 dependency system broken? [gcc-3.0.2/ARM]
• 2001-11-07 23:40 Re: GCC backend for dummy ?
• 2001-11-09 03:33 [patch] ARM: -mdisable-got adapted for gcc-3.0.2
• 2001-11-09 06:11 [arm/thumb] bug in machine description
• 2001-11-12 06:37 arm/thumb bugs
• 2001-11-12 09:15 Re: arm/thumb bugs
• 2001-11-13 02:10 Re: arm/thumb bugs
• 2001-11-13 06:25 Bug in cse? (Or in LABEL_PRESERVE_P?)
• 2001-11-13 07:27 Re: Bug in cse? (Or in LABEL_PRESERVE_P?)
• 2001-11-13 08:23 Re: [arm/thumb] bug in machine description
• 2001-11-13 08:40 Re: [patch] ARM: -mdisable-got adapted for gcc-3.0.2
• 2001-11-15 02:05 writing casesi (was: Re: arm/thumb bugs)
• 2001-11-19 01:54 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-19 07:34 Re: writing casesi (was: Re: arm/thumb bugs)
• 2001-11-19 07:49 multilib question
• 2001-11-20 02:23 Re: target/4855: arm (thumb) backend generates illegal strb instruction]
• 2001-11-20 23:37 How to take the address of a label_ref?
• 2001-11-22 23:54 Re: Building unique object files and binaries
• 2001-11-29 09:05 Oddities in ARM (stack handling)

Alan Lehotsky

• 2001-11-28 06:16 Re: Need some help with GCC

Alan Matsuoka

• 2001-11-19 14:03 Re: include facility for .md files
• 2001-11-19 15:05 Re: include facility for .md files
• 2001-11-19 17:51 Re: include facility for .md files
• 2001-11-19 19:15 Re: include facility for .md files

Aldy Hernandez

• 2001-11-02 07:20 Re: cc & gcc
• 2001-11-02 10:29 Re: contributing altivec changes
• 2001-11-04 21:07 Re: Writing a frontend to GCC
• 2001-11-07 09:51 Re: dependency system broken? [gcc-3.0.2/ARM]
• 2001-11-07 13:13 altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-07 13:32 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-07 18:34 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-08 08:36 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-08 18:48 testing altivec
• 2001-11-12 06:52 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-13 07:50 scavanging a reg
• 2001-11-13 08:39 Re: scavanging a reg
• 2001-11-19 13:46 include facility for .md files
• 2001-11-19 15:18 Re: include facility for .md files
• 2001-11-19 19:08 Re: include facility for .md files
• 2001-11-21 22:20 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 22:58 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-23 14:42 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-23 14:42 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-23 14:47 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-23 14:48 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-23 14:50 Re: gcc frontend macros
• 2001-11-25 18:02 Re: Is gcc 3.x broken on Linux/PPC?
• 2001-11-26 02:51 front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-26 16:39 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-26 18:19 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-26 18:46 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-26 18:55 Re: vectorizing optimization
• 2001-11-27 06:46 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 07:24 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 07:47 Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.12 is released.
• 2001-11-27 07:55 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 08:29 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 13:12 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 13:13 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 13:44 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 13:52 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 13:56 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 16:50 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 16:56 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 16:57 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 16:58 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 17:10 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 17:10 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 17:24 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 18:00 Re: front end changes for altivec-- conclusion
• 2001-11-27 18:21 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-27 18:28 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-28 07:11 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-28 07:33 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 09:16 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 20:40 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom

Alex Bryant

• 2001-11-22 08:37 Careers Link
• 2001-11-22 08:37 Careers Link

Alex Buell

• 2001-11-09 06:02 Which CVS tag to get GCC 2.95.4?

Alex Hornby

• 2001-11-15 06:58 RE: c++ name mangling question

Alex Zhukov

• 2001-11-19 06:26 Re: Is 64 bit ObjC for SolarisSparc available?

Alexandre Oliva

• 2001-11-04 00:32 Re: dangerous cleverness? ppc int<->float conversions, subreg
• 2001-11-05 19:31 Re: dangerous cleverness? ppc int<->float conversions, subreg
• 2001-11-11 17:13 Re: 64 bit gcc?
• 2001-11-11 17:13 Re: gcc problem
• 2001-11-12 18:36 Re: gcc executable for different OS revisions
• 2001-11-16 22:19 Potential GC problem in preprocessed C++
• 2001-11-18 03:56 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-18 04:13 Re: Help: libstdc++-2.8.0 and malloc
• 2001-11-18 04:44 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-18 05:12 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-18 05:16 Re: A much needed simplification of g77 and libf2c's Makefiles.
• 2001-11-18 06:07 Re: ObjC tree inlining
• 2001-11-18 06:10 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-18 06:33 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 06:40 Re: [Ada] ada/Makefile.in question
• 2001-11-18 06:47 Re: branch merging
• 2001-11-18 07:35 Re: writing casesi (was: Re: arm/thumb bugs)
• 2001-11-18 09:13 Re: ObjC tree inlining
• 2001-11-18 10:38 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-18 10:51 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 11:25 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-19 09:40 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-19 09:43 Re: Should gcc use maintainer-mode?
• 2001-11-19 19:15 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 13:30 Re: anoncvs access
• 2001-11-20 17:26 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 14:56 Re: Undefined reference
• 2001-11-21 15:02 Re: Treelang frontend
• 2001-11-21 18:17 Re: list of known bugs for gcc
• 2001-11-24 18:04 Re: -Wswitch and default case
• 2001-11-24 18:09 Re: Signal while compiling libvorbis
• 2001-11-26 09:57 Re: urgent
• 2001-11-26 09:59 Re: -pthread
• 2001-11-26 22:56 Re: Downgrade unsuccessfull
• 2001-11-28 20:44 Re: Why don't we provide a default INSTALL_SCRIPT in gcc/Makefile.in?
• 2001-11-28 21:07 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-28 21:08 Re: Checking out PR4483 (constant overflow on PPC, problems compiling Linux kernel)
• 2001-11-28 22:34 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-29 06:46 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-29 07:59 Re: libstdc++v3 configuration
• 2001-11-29 08:01 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-29 10:11 Re: Using throw(): to use or not to use?
• 2001-11-29 10:50 Re: urgent help 2
• 2001-11-30 11:45 Re: __cxa_pure_virtual
• 2001-11-30 11:47 Re: Missing Directory in CVS tree

Alexandre Petit-Bianco

• 2001-11-26 17:29 Re: copyright assignment papers

Andi Kleen

• 2001-11-05 16:49 Re: C and assembly listing
• 2001-11-05 16:53 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII

Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci

• 2001-11-07 17:29 Re: prefetch revisited
• 2001-11-13 06:18 Re: Help please?
• 2001-11-18 18:02 Re: Join List?
• 2001-11-20 02:56 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 12:31 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-23 16:40 Re: How to find the phototype of function "drand48()"
• 2001-11-24 06:15 Re: How to find the phototype of function "drand48()"
• 2001-11-25 13:58 Re: Downgrading
• 2001-11-26 13:05 Re: help with gcc
• 2001-11-26 14:59 vectorizing optimization
• 2001-11-30 16:51 Re: qcc configuration
• 2001-11-30 16:57 Re: GCC/Fortran 90/95 questions

Andreas Jaeger

• 2001-11-10 05:05 Re: CVS down?
• 2001-11-19 05:28 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-26 02:55 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-26 04:26 Re: Sparc bootstrap problem compiling unwind-dw2-fde.c
• 2001-11-26 04:49 Re: configure: error: unable to detect exception model
• 2001-11-26 06:47 Re: configure: error: unable to detect exception model
• 2001-11-26 07:23 Re: configure: error: unable to detect exception model
• 2001-11-27 07:50 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-29 05:14 Re: Top level configure unsupported targets

Andreas Schwab

• 2001-11-05 02:41 Re: emacs21 and -z nocombreloc
• 2001-11-05 04:07 Re: Cannot bootstrap gcc on the mainline
• 2001-11-06 02:16 Re: * Re: emacs21 and -z nocombreloc
• 2001-11-08 04:30 insn_operand_mode in ada/misc.c
• 2001-11-09 06:47 Re: Which CVS tag to get GCC 2.95.4?
• 2001-11-09 09:06 Ada bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2001-11-09 10:09 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2001-11-10 08:49 Re: mkstemp() support on target
• 2001-11-13 04:58 gcc-ss-20011112 bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-14 04:05 [Ada] warning: file name does not match unit name
• 2001-11-14 04:22 Re: [Ada] warning: file name does not match unit name
• 2001-11-14 06:27 Re: [Ada] warning: file name does not match unit name
• 2001-11-19 03:04 Re: building GNAT on Windows (without Cygwin)
• 2001-11-25 08:57 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-29 05:26 Re: Top level configure unsupported targets
• 2001-11-29 07:11 New Ada build problem on ia64
• 2001-11-29 08:27 Re: New Ada build problem on ia64
• 2001-11-29 14:21 Re: New Ada build problem on ia64
• 2001-11-29 15:01 Re: New Ada build problem on ia64

Andreas Svrcek-Seiler

• 2001-11-19 04:48 GCC and fast eveluaton of polynomials
• 2001-11-20 06:33 Re: GCC and fast eveluaton of polynomials

Andreas Tobler

• 2001-11-15 05:19 Re: Build failure on Alpha
• 2001-11-16 03:13 another build failure on solaris-2.6
• 2001-11-21 13:37 buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 13:53 Re: new cvs server problem
• 2001-11-21 23:32 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 23:42 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-22 00:18 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin

Andrew Ducore

• 2001-11-16 17:50 a.out file format

Andrew Pinski

• 2001-11-01 22:31 Re: Last Patch to the testsuit
• 2001-11-06 19:29 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)
• 2001-11-06 20:06 Re: gcc switch problem

Andris Pavenis

• 2001-11-01 02:47 Re: When will I be able to compile 8139too.c
• 2001-11-20 23:20 Re: Why gcc 3.0.1 fails for sh target (coff,hms)

Anthony Green

• 2001-11-29 06:53 Re: Top level configure unsupported targets

anti-virus-staff

• 2001-11-26 03:20 Virus Alert
• 2001-11-26 03:32 Virus Alert
• 2001-11-26 03:32 Virus Alert
• 2001-11-26 03:33 Virus Alert
• 2001-11-26 03:34 Virus Alert
• 2001-11-26 03:36 Virus Alert
• 2001-11-26 03:36 Virus Alert
• 2001-11-26 03:36 Virus Alert

Antonio No

• 2001-11-03 12:10 Problems with gcc-2.96

Arijit Paul

• 2001-11-26 12:31 help with gcc

Arnaud Charlet

• 2001-11-02 09:28 Possible bug in gcc/Makefile.in
• 2001-11-07 07:14 Re: [Ada]
• 2001-11-07 08:16 Re: [Ada] Namespace pollution in GNAT run-time library
• 2001-11-14 17:08 Re: [Ada] warning: file name does not match unit name
• 2001-11-26 15:13 Re: [Ada] some parallel build fixes

Arslan Bahar

• 2001-11-19 02:55 hello every body

Austin Donnelly

• 2001-11-14 10:19 bug(?): anonymous initialisers go in the .data section, not .rodata
• 2001-11-15 06:32 Re: bug(?): anonymous initialisers go in the .data section, not .rodata

B. Hurler

• 2001-11-14 10:27 GCC with Intralink

Baris M Kazar

• 2001-11-20 16:15 Partial optimization

Benjamin Kalytta

• 2001-11-01 12:13 Fw: general question/suggestion

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2001-11-01 18:17 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-02 16:05 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-05 10:27 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-05 16:35 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-13 09:41 Re: pfstream ?
• 2001-11-24 20:36 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-25 22:17 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-25 22:50 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?

Bernd Schmidt

• 2001-11-17 17:09 Re: Complex integer division
• 2001-11-23 02:33 e2fsck-1.25 problem (fwd)
• 2001-11-27 08:00 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 14:13 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 14:41 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)

Bernhard Schaffer

• 2001-11-01 08:46 basic questions about GCC (porting GCC to a new target)

Bharat Kumar Gera

• 2001-11-02 22:51 Hi

Bo Thorsen

• 2001-11-15 01:22 Re: User level threads
• 2001-11-30 03:02 Re: -pthread

Boehm, Hans

• 2001-11-05 11:29 IA64 stack unwinder, yet again
• 2001-11-20 11:37 Exception handling problem: return address dead
• 2001-11-20 18:25 RE: Exception handling problem: return address dead

Brad Lucier

• 2001-11-01 05:58 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 07:32 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 09:03 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 09:04 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 11:24 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-07 07:57 Re: [Ada] gnat_rmtexi: Use @./@: where appropriate.
• 2001-11-11 03:49 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-11 10:43 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-14 11:24 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-15 16:36 -fstrict-fp-semantics (was Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability)
• 2001-11-16 08:37 Re: -fstrict-fp-semantics (was Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability)
• 2001-11-16 09:25 Re: -fstrict-fp-semantics (was Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability)
• 2001-11-28 07:25 alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom
• 2001-11-28 09:19 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom
• 2001-11-28 09:46 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom

Branko Čibej

• 2001-11-21 12:32 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)

Brian Abbott

• 2001-11-13 11:24 RE: C compiler
• 2001-11-15 16:24 RE: PowerPC Inline assembler documentation

Brian R. Gaeke

• 2001-11-01 21:49 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make

Brown, Jeff

• 2001-11-21 14:22 broken links?

Bruce Korb

• 2001-11-12 17:18 gcc-3.0.2 build problems

Bryce McKinlay

• 2001-11-01 17:53 Re: BSS size
• 2001-11-02 18:27 multilibs
• 2001-11-03 16:14 Re: multilibs
• 2001-11-04 15:27 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-04 20:01 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-15 00:48 Re: User level threads
• 2001-11-15 03:02 PowerPC w/ shared libgcc: "R_PPC_REL24 relocation... out of range"
• 2001-11-15 12:28 Re: PowerPC w/ shared libgcc: "R_PPC_REL24 relocation... out of range"
• 2001-11-15 14:19 Re: PowerPC w/ shared libgcc: "R_PPC_REL24 relocation... out of range"
• 2001-11-18 18:51 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-26 00:47 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-30 18:32 Re: Top-level Makefile

Catherine Harper

• 2001-11-03 18:00 questions on writing a back-end' to gcc

cgd

• 2001-11-02 10:22 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-17 23:49 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1

Chip Cuntz

• 2001-11-05 13:59 X IDE for gcc?
• 2001-11-13 12:34 RE: C compiler

Christoph Hellwig

• 2001-11-02 00:34 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-05 05:05 Re: C and assembly listing
• 2001-11-07 04:45 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)

Christopher Faylor

• 2001-11-10 11:11 Re: CVS down?
• 2001-11-15 19:52 Re: gcc-2.95.3-5 on cygwin compilation problem
• 2001-11-27 16:58 Re: CVS server

Claus Fischer

• 2001-11-24 04:21 -Wswitch and default case

Corey Minyard

• 2001-11-14 14:16 Small Ada makefile addition
• 2001-11-15 20:12 Problem with Ada working on Linux PowerPC port
• 2001-11-15 20:19 Re: Problem with Ada working on Linux PowerPC port
• 2001-11-16 06:27 Re: Problem with Ada working on Linux PowerPC port
• 2001-11-22 00:04 Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-22 07:35 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-23 15:24 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-25 15:06 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-25 20:27 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-26 08:58 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-26 10:22 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-26 14:45 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-26 17:15 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 10:08 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 11:51 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 13:25 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 15:04 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 19:57 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-28 11:26 Checking out PR4483 (constant overflow on PPC, problems compiling Linux kernel)

Craig Carey

• 2001-11-14 15:00 Website page states "cvs co -c" ?; gcc in NT croaks using Cygwin winnt.h

Craig Prescott (Contract)

• 2001-11-30 10:37 Succcessful bootstrap of gcc 3.0.2 on hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

Craig Rodrigues

• 2001-11-10 13:49 Re: ada/4848: Internal compiler error in instantiate_virtual_regs_1, at function.c:3904
• 2001-11-15 10:14 Re: cygwin gcc issues
• 2001-11-17 07:40 Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-17 12:14 Re: target/4606 config.gcc refers to non-existant va-clipper.h
• 2001-11-18 20:37 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-22 00:11 ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-22 03:59 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c

Dale Johannesen

• 2001-11-01 14:29 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 16:02 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 10:45 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 11:21 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 11:31 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 13:36 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 16:52 const folding vs multiply-add
• 2001-11-20 11:27 help with combine
• 2001-11-27 14:46 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 17:06 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 17:40 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-28 11:44 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-30 10:24 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 15:02 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:

Dan Nicolaescu

• 2001-11-16 09:37 SPEC95 results for the DFA scheduler branch on SPARC
• 2001-11-16 12:47 should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-16 15:02 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-17 11:23 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-19 14:33 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?

Daniel Berlin

• 2001-11-17 19:30 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-17 21:08 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 08:38 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-25 22:49 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-27 11:35 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-28 22:21 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-28 23:00 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-29 04:45 Re: front end changes for altivec

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2001-11-05 08:12 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-07 13:19 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-07 13:56 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-07 15:22 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-08 08:30 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-14 16:50 Re: MIPS _mcount-based profiling doesn't work with -abicalls (2.95.3)
• 2001-11-14 17:38 Re: MIPS _mcount-based profiling doesn't work with -abicalls (2.95.3)
• 2001-11-16 21:53 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-18 10:04 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-18 10:07 Re: altivec triplets: comments?

Daniel.Andersson

• 2001-11-22 05:23 RE: error when I building binutils under cygwin on win98 - take2

Danish Samad

• 2001-11-06 19:54 gcc switch problem
• 2001-11-23 02:22 gcc frontend macros
• 2001-11-27 22:58 debugging gcc

david benbasat

• 2001-11-09 09:27 problems with math.h of gcc
• 2001-11-09 09:27 problems with math.h of gcc

David Edelsohn

• 2001-11-01 08:27 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-01 12:26 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 14:45 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 14:51 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 15:00 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 15:09 Re: Build problem on AIX 5.1 in libiberty, uint64_t definition
• 2001-11-01 16:09 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 18:58 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 20:59 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 07:57 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 10:05 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 10:56 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 13:38 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-02 14:08 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-02 14:31 Re: #pragma weak conformance
• 2001-11-02 18:02 Re: #pragma weak conformance
• 2001-11-07 22:48 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 08:31 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 11:58 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 13:12 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 13:27 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-09 06:40 Re: i386 bootstrap failure: libiberty/sort.c:134: Unrecognizable insn
• 2001-11-09 06:54 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-09 09:46 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2001-11-09 10:53 Re: GCC support for PowerPC 405 CR
• 2001-11-09 12:03 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-09 23:39 AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-10 07:56 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-10 09:15 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-10 11:25 Re: CVS down?
• 2001-11-10 15:38 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-10 17:00 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-10 21:45 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-11 14:44 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-11 14:49 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-13 08:25 Re: scavanging a reg
• 2001-11-13 10:29 Re: scavanging a reg
• 2001-11-19 14:12 Re: GNU compiler options for ODBc
• 2001-11-20 18:42 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-20 19:17 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-20 20:38 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-21 19:20 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 22:04 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 22:58 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 23:38 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-22 00:08 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-22 00:22 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-26 07:39 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-26 15:21 Re: vectorizing optimization
• 2001-11-28 18:29 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-29 08:09 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-29 10:27 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-29 11:52 Re: P.R. 4913
• 2001-11-30 08:17 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-30 19:33 Re: Top-level Makefile

David O'Brien

• 2001-11-20 16:21 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-20 16:21 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 16:21 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 16:21 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 16:21 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 16:50 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 19:16 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-20 19:20 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-20 19:43 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-20 20:27 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-21 13:08 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 13:08 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 13:08 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 13:48 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-22 13:07 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available

David S. Miller

• 2001-11-12 21:34 Re: libstdc++ bus errors

David Starner

• 2001-11-02 16:03 [Ada] GNAT.Directory_Operations has problems
• 2001-11-02 22:04 Re: [Ada] GNAT.Directory_Operations has problems
• 2001-11-20 17:49 Re: Continuing problems trying to build Ada

davide.rossetti

• 2001-11-30 12:31 TImode ?inhibited? in main 3.1 branch

degger

• 2001-11-02 02:06 Re: contributing altivec changes
• 2001-11-02 02:06 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-09 15:49 Re: problems with math.h of gcc
• 2001-11-09 15:49 Re: const folding vs multiply-add
• 2001-11-10 06:10 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-10 09:03 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-10 15:22 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-11 14:21 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-11 14:21 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-12 09:37 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-17 05:22 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 08:19 Re: altivec triplets: comments?

Devang Patel

• 2001-11-21 15:03 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 15:29 Re: Treelang frontend
• 2001-11-27 17:37 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 11:09 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for

development

• 2001-11-01 07:40 problems with packed ennums in g++

dewar

• 2001-11-01 04:25 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 05:26 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 07:00 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 07:07 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 09:21 Re: general question/suggestion
• 2001-11-02 20:22 Re: [Ada] GNAT.Directory_Operations has problems
• 2001-11-03 03:34 Re: [Ada] GNAT.Directory_Operations has problems
• 2001-11-04 17:35 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 04:49 Re: C and assembly listing
• 2001-11-05 17:06 Re: X IDE for gcc?
• 2001-11-07 03:12 Re: [Ada] Internal compiler error box
• 2001-11-07 03:16 Re: [Ada] GNAT maintainer
• 2001-11-07 03:17 Re: [Ada] Nag screen
• 2001-11-07 03:42 Re: [Ada] Internal compiler error box
• 2001-11-07 04:06 Re: [Ada] GNAT maintainer
• 2001-11-07 04:19 Re: Commas after "i.e." and "e.g." (was: Re: [Ada] gnat_rmtexi: Use @./@: where appropriate.)
• 2001-11-07 04:28 Re: [Ada] Nag screen
• 2001-11-08 16:50 Re: Commas after "i.e." and "e.g." (was: Re: [Ada] gnat_rmtexi: Use @./@: where appropriate.)
• 2001-11-10 06:45 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-10 18:53 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-11 07:18 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-15 05:14 RE: c++ name mangling question
• 2001-11-15 11:05 Re: ADA in gcc 3.1
• 2001-11-15 17:44 Re: boostrapping Ada
• 2001-11-18 05:45 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-19 11:23 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-20 05:17 Re: GCC and fast eveluaton of polynomials
• 2001-11-20 16:46 Re: Continuing problems trying to build Ada
• 2001-11-20 18:06 Re: Continuing problems trying to build Ada
• 2001-11-22 20:31 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-23 08:52 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 06:33 Re: How to find the phototype of function "drand48()"
• 2001-11-25 15:20 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)

Diego Novillo

• 2001-11-22 19:56 Re: Higher level RTL issues

Dieter Schmitz

• 2001-11-24 15:40 Signal while compiling libvorbis

DJ Delorie

• 2001-11-01 11:55 powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 12:48 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 13:03 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 14:32 Re: Limit unnamed fields in structs / unions
• 2001-11-01 15:23 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 15:27 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 15:36 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 16:30 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 20:45 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-01 21:03 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-01 21:54 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 10:28 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 10:49 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 10:59 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 16:05 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-02 16:24 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-02 17:55 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-03 12:36 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-03 12:46 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-12 11:28 Re: mkinstalldirs
• 2001-11-12 14:11 Re: mkinstalldirs
• 2001-11-12 17:55 Re: gcc/doschk.c
• 2001-11-18 21:16 Re: Can hex numbers appear as a const_int in md files?
• 2001-11-29 16:46 Re: How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler

Douglas B. Rupp

• 2001-11-09 09:50 Uninitialized register in gcse on VMS
• 2001-11-16 11:23 Re: VMS status

Dworschak, Michael

• 2001-11-19 23:41 G++ Installation

Eli Zaretskii

• 2001-11-04 07:51 Built-in bzero in GCC 3.0.2
• 2001-11-05 00:46 Re: Built-in bzero in GCC 3.0.2
• 2001-11-05 00:47 Re: Built-in bzero in GCC 3.0.2

Eric Christopher

• 2001-11-01 13:17 Re: variable argument list in irix
• 2001-11-27 13:07 Re: How do we use -mabi= for mips?
• 2001-11-27 14:45 Re: How do we use -mabi= for mips?
• 2001-11-27 16:45 Re: CVS server

Erik M. Buck

• 2001-11-15 09:09 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++

Fergus Henderson

• 2001-11-03 19:54 Re: A bug or spec? No warning on a switch case not handled.
• 2001-11-03 21:37 Re: general question/suggestion
• 2001-11-25 21:58 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 22:06 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c

Fleury Jean-Francois

• 2001-11-09 01:46 GCC support for PowerPC 405 CR

Florian Krohm

• 2001-11-14 12:01 tree representation of C data types
• 2001-11-30 10:12 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 10:54 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:

Florian Weimer

• 2001-11-05 11:34 Re: [wwwdocs] Initial criteria.html (was Re: Where's the currentlist of release criteria?)
• 2001-11-07 03:07 [Ada] Internal compiler error box
• 2001-11-07 03:07 [Ada] GNAT maintainer
• 2001-11-07 03:07 [Ada] Nag screen
• 2001-11-07 03:19 Re: [Ada] Internal compiler error box
• 2001-11-07 04:51 [Ada]
• 2001-11-07 05:37 Re: [Ada] Namespace pollution in GNAT run-time library
• 2001-11-07 07:56 Re: [Ada] Namespace pollution in GNAT run-time library
• 2001-11-10 03:14 Re: mkstemp() support on target
• 2001-11-10 07:59 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-10 13:10 Re: ada/4848: Internal compiler error ininstantiate_virtual_regs_1, at function.c:3904
• 2001-11-11 08:59 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-16 11:38 Re: boostrapping Ada
• 2001-11-16 11:39 Re: ADA in gcc 3.1
• 2001-11-18 03:25 Re: Deprecating -traditional has passed the SC
• 2001-11-21 13:24 Re: Continuing problems trying to build Ada
• 2001-11-22 13:53 Re: Building unique object files and binaries
• 2001-11-25 05:12 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-25 22:43 Re: Bug or another C++ oddity?

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2001-11-29 12:59 Re: Using throw(): to use or not to use?

Frank Davis

• 2001-11-30 22:53 gcc 2.95.3/4 Redhat 6.0 rpm ?

Frank Klemm

• 2001-11-02 15:44 Bug in 2.95.* series
• 2001-11-03 20:07 Compile time error

Frank Pilhofer

• 2001-11-30 08:34 Successful compilation of Mico using gcc snapshot

Franz Sirl

• 2001-11-23 02:59 Re: e2fsck-1.25 problem (fwd)
• 2001-11-30 14:23 Re: GCC 3.0.3: Bugs to Fix

Frederic

• 2001-11-14 13:42 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++

g'o'tz ohnesorge

• 2001-11-04 05:44 C in, JavaByteCode out ?

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2001-11-01 00:16 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 00:19 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 00:20 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 06:28 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 06:36 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 06:38 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 06:44 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 07:06 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 07:44 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 09:36 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-02 07:14 Pessimization in compiler support for builtin __complex__
• 2001-11-23 11:04 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 23:16 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 23:19 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 03:39 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 03:44 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 14:37 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c

Gabriel Paubert

• 2001-11-22 04:51 Re: x86 FP optimizer behaviour

Gcc testing account

• 2001-11-04 16:09 Succesfully build and installed gcc-3.0.2

gccadmin

• 2001-11-05 20:23 gcc-ss-20011105 is now available
• 2001-11-12 18:15 gcc-ss-20011112 is now available
• 2001-11-19 17:46 gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-26 19:03 gcc-ss-20011126 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2001-11-01 14:57 Build problem on AIX 5.1 in libiberty, uint64_t definition
• 2001-11-01 15:16 Re: Build problem on AIX 5.1 in libiberty, uint64_t definition
• 2001-11-07 05:25 Re: [Ada] Namespace pollution in GNAT run-time library
• 2001-11-14 06:15 Re: [Ada] warning: file name does not match unit name
• 2001-11-15 14:19 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 08:54 Problem with relocation in reload1 on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2001-11-16 10:32 Re: Problem with relocation in reload1 on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2001-11-29 15:23 How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler
• 2001-11-29 16:33 ICE outputting unaligned fp constant on powerpc-apple-darwin5.1
• 2001-11-29 16:57 Re: How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler
• 2001-11-29 17:10 Re: How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler
• 2001-11-30 08:40 Re: How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler
• 2001-11-30 14:30 Re: [Ada] Q about building cross gnatlib

Geoff Keating

• 2001-11-02 11:21 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 12:58 Re: Gcc 3.x regression in constant initializer [compile/20010327-1.c]
• 2001-11-02 14:07 Re: #pragma weak conformance
• 2001-11-02 17:50 Re: #pragma weak conformance
• 2001-11-03 13:08 Re: multilibs
• 2001-11-07 14:25 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-07 15:55 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-08 12:41 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-11 00:20 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-11 03:29 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-15 23:55 Re: Last alignment change for MEM tracking
• 2001-11-18 13:38 Re: altivec triplets: comments?
• 2001-11-19 12:04 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-22 13:14 Re: Building unique object files and binaries
• 2001-11-27 12:10 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-30 00:02 Re: Regression tester v. runtime libraries
• 2001-11-30 00:08 Re: Top-level Makefile

George France

• 2001-11-11 21:13 Re: new benchmark times on alpha

George Garvey

• 2001-11-22 00:35 DW_FORM_strp
• 2001-11-22 01:04 Re: DW_FORM_strp
• 2001-11-25 21:41 Bug or another C++ oddity?

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2001-11-02 00:28 Re: is g++ verson 3.0.2 really slower?
• 2001-11-02 09:38 Re: Possible bug in gcc/Makefile.in
• 2001-11-02 11:01 Re: backup schedule on FSF machines
• 2001-11-05 00:18 Re: NLS, attribute errors via cpp during bootstrap
• 2001-11-06 01:56 Re: NLS, attribute errors via cpp during bootstrap
• 2001-11-07 07:38 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)
• 2001-11-09 01:42 i386 bootstrap failure: libiberty/sort.c:134: Unrecognizable insn
• 2001-11-09 02:43 Re: Web page problem
• 2001-11-09 13:32 Re: MMIX port, acceptance status?
• 2001-11-11 23:20 Re: want get gcc compiler
• 2001-11-12 01:01 Re: Who is "--mew" (comments in manual from 1993)?
• 2001-11-12 01:10 GCC g77 mail address @gnu.org
• 2001-11-12 05:20 Re: i386 bootstrap failure: libiberty/sort.c:134: Unrecognizableinsn
• 2001-11-12 23:09 Re: GCC g77 mail address @gnu.org
• 2001-11-13 03:13 Re: gcc-ss-20011112 is now available
• 2001-11-13 05:20 Mail archives (was: GCC g77 mail address @gnu.org)
• 2001-11-18 08:18 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-19 02:58 Re: hello every body
• 2001-11-19 11:11 Re: Bugzilla features
• 2001-11-21 04:38 gccadmin account: scripts vs maintainer-scripts
• 2001-11-21 04:47 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 08:13 Treelang frontend
• 2001-11-21 13:56 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 14:14 Re: gccadmin account: scripts vs maintainer-scripts
• 2001-11-21 15:23 Re: Treelang frontend
• 2001-11-22 03:40 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-22 04:18 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 02:01 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c

Gerardo Javier Oliva Galvan

• 2001-11-27 09:06 Gcc 32-bits or 64-bits
• 2001-11-27 09:49 Re: Gcc 32-bits or 64-bits

gnome-webmaster-list-admin

• 2001-11-26 03:41 Your message to gnome-webmaster-list awaits moderator approval

gnupg-announce-admin

• 2001-11-26 03:29 Your message to Gnupg-announce awaits moderator approval

GNUTeam

• 2001-11-20 20:53 Why gcc 3.0.1 fails for sh target (coff,hms)
• 2001-11-20 21:10 Why gcc 3.0.1 fails for sh target (coff,hms)

Graham Stott

• 2001-11-27 15:43 Re: GNAT build still broken

gtsupplies

• 2001-11-13 18:07 Toner cartridges 40% off retail price

guerby

• 2001-11-05 10:53 Re: [wwwdocs] Initial criteria.html (was Re: Where's the currentlist of release criteria?)
• 2001-11-07 13:46 C Warnings
• 2001-11-08 05:00 [g77] make -k check fails last reporting
• 2001-11-09 10:01 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2001-11-09 10:25 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2001-11-12 03:57 Re: ada/4848: Internal compiler error in instantiate_virtual_regs _1, at function.c:3904
• 2001-11-15 10:49 Re: ADA in gcc 3.1
• 2001-11-16 04:04 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 09:43 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 10:38 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 11:28 Re: Problem with Ada working on Linux PowerPC port
• 2001-11-16 14:03 [Ada] ada/Makefile.in question
• 2001-11-17 11:46 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 05:43 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-20 11:15 Re: Continuing problems trying to build Ada
• 2001-11-22 00:47 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-22 10:51 Re: Native GNAT build succeeded
• 2001-11-26 14:40 Re: [Ada] some parallel build fixes
• 2001-11-28 13:43 [Ada] ACATS CXG2013 fixed
• 2001-11-29 14:49 Re: New Ada build problem on ia64
• 2001-11-30 13:40 [Ada] Q about building cross gnatlib
• 2001-11-30 15:07 Re: [Ada] Q about building cross gnatlib

Guillaume

• 2001-11-29 18:46 fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 09:54 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 13:55 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:

H . J . Lu

• 2001-11-01 08:51 Re: Mozilla on MIPS
• 2001-11-02 10:13 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-04 13:12 Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-04 19:59 Could someone please fix gcc 3.0?
• 2001-11-05 10:28 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-10 19:58 Warning in today's CVS
• 2001-11-15 08:43 Re: PowerPC w/ shared libgcc: "R_PPC_REL24 relocation... out of range"
• 2001-11-16 17:17 Re: PowerPC w/ shared libgcc: "R_PPC_REL24 relocation... out of range"
• 2001-11-18 09:57 Re: 3.1 20011116 failed to bootstrap on mips
• 2001-11-18 23:55 Should gcc use maintainer-mode?
• 2001-11-20 19:38 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-20 20:24 Re: powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-22 00:14 Is gcc 3.x broken on Linux/PPC?
• 2001-11-24 11:51 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-25 01:19 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-25 17:56 Re: Is gcc 3.x broken on Linux/PPC?
• 2001-11-25 18:49 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-25 22:32 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-26 11:23 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-26 12:01 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-26 21:29 The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.12 is released.
• 2001-11-27 11:28 Why don't we provide a default INSTALL_SCRIPT in gcc/Makefile.in?
• 2001-11-27 11:47 How do we use -mabi= for mips?
• 2001-11-27 22:55 Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.12 is released.
• 2001-11-28 10:00 IA64 failed to bootstrap (Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on
• 2001-11-28 23:22 The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.12.3 is released.

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2001-11-03 18:07 Re: prefetch revisited
• 2001-11-10 08:55 Re: langhooks-def.h and langhooks.h
• 2001-11-10 13:28 Re: GCC backend for dummy ?

Hartmut Penner

• 2001-11-04 22:48 Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-04 23:32 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-14 23:11 Re: gcc options

Hartmut Schirmer

• 2001-11-02 09:41 Re: prefetch revisited
• 2001-11-13 11:48 Re: arm/thumb bugs
• 2001-11-24 11:14 Re: -Wswitch and default case

Harvey J. Stein

• 2001-11-01 05:44 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 08:21 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 11:39 Re: Change definition of complex::norm

Hegde, Rajendra

• 2001-11-02 14:45 Want to learn more about inernals of gcc

Heiko Nardmann

• 2001-11-12 06:15 Q: syntax and semantics of -fdump-ast-original output?

Helge Hess

• 2001-11-20 01:05 Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++)

Ian Cottam

• 2001-11-19 06:19 Use of -fno-exceptions

Ian Molton

• 2001-11-03 14:38 ARM3 etc.

Ian S. Nelson

• 2001-11-22 08:57 Building unique object files and binaries

Igor Sominskiy

• 2001-11-29 17:11 thread safety

imajina.ne

• 2001-11-28 12:26 INFORMAÇÃO

InterScan

• 2001-11-26 03:25 Virus Alert
• 2001-11-26 03:25 Virus Alert

Ira Ruben

• 2001-11-26 23:45 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes foraltivec)
• 2001-11-27 10:47 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes foraltivec)
• 2001-11-27 10:53 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes foraltivec)
• 2001-11-27 12:47 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)

Isabelle Descamps

• 2001-11-27 09:00 GNU Fortran inquiry

Jack Cummings

• 2001-11-11 21:26 Re: 64 bit gcc?
• 2001-11-27 09:37 Re: Gcc 32-bits or 64-bits

Jack Howarth

• 2001-11-05 14:23 * Re: emacs21 and -z nocombreloc
• 2001-11-18 08:02 precompiled headers in gcc 3.1?

Jack Lloyd

• 2001-11-15 08:48 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-28 23:44 Re: front end changes for altivec

Jakub Jelinek

• 2001-11-12 03:43 Re: ada/4848: Internal compiler error in instantiate_virtual_regs _1, at function.c:3904
• 2001-11-16 03:31 Re: [PATCH] Updated glibc-gcc3.patch
• 2001-11-18 12:26 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-19 05:31 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-22 00:40 Re: DW_FORM_strp
• 2001-11-26 01:40 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-27 16:22 Alpha bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-28 07:01 Re: ios.lo complilation promblems
• 2001-11-30 11:47 Re: GCC 3.0.3

James Macnicol

• 2001-11-22 02:58 x86 FP optimizer behaviour

james_williams

• 2001-11-10 14:55 libGCJ
• 2001-11-28 02:02 assertions
• 2001-11-28 02:14 apologies

Jan Hubicka

• 2001-11-03 08:41 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-03 08:44 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-03 14:15 Re: AMD Athlon XP optimizations
• 2001-11-05 05:11 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 06:46 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 07:28 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results for gcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-06 06:41 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results for gcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-06 07:02 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-06 08:56 i386 RTX_COST tweeks take 2
• 2001-11-07 04:37 Re: i386 RTX_COST tweeks take 2
• 2001-11-08 05:13 Re: i386 RTX_COST tweeks take 2
• 2001-11-08 06:11 Combine versus volatile (Was: Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII)
• 2001-11-08 07:14 Re: relaod1.c: fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2001-11-08 07:36 Re: relaod1.c: fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2001-11-08 09:00 Re: Combine versus volatile (Was: Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII)
• 2001-11-11 06:03 Re: porting gcc to z80 machines
• 2001-11-11 06:07 Re: Integrating a new front end
• 2001-11-11 10:49 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-12 05:23 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-12 06:22 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-13 03:12 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-13 03:15 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-14 02:59 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-15 06:47 numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 03:52 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 06:41 Re: -fstrict-fp-semantics (was Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability)
• 2001-11-16 08:32 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 08:52 Re: Last alignment change for MEM tracking
• 2001-11-16 08:55 Re: -fstrict-fp-semantics (was Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability)
• 2001-11-16 12:04 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 12:15 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-17 07:54 Re: i386 flags register clober in inline assembly
• 2001-11-18 05:15 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-22 05:37 Re: CLOBBER MEM in stack ops on x86
• 2001-11-28 01:12 Re: Question about SUBREG handling in get_last_value

Janis Johnson

• 2001-11-01 08:46 Re: successful GCC 3.0.2 install
• 2001-11-01 17:25 Re: prefetch revisited
• 2001-11-05 12:52 Re: Succesfully build and installed gcc-3.0.2
• 2001-11-05 12:55 Re: Successfully built and installed GCC
• 2001-11-05 14:20 Re: prefetch revisited
• 2001-11-07 22:08 Re: prefetch revisited
• 2001-11-13 11:07 Re: warning: Arc profiling: some edge counts were bad.
• 2001-11-30 16:02 Re: Another Successfull Build
• 2001-11-30 16:05 Re: i386-unknown-freebsd4.2 and gcc-3.0
• 2001-11-30 16:06 Re: Succcessful bootstrap of gcc 3.0.2 on hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

Jason Molenda

• 2001-11-21 13:49 Re: Somebody needs to fix the tmp permissions

Jason Wong

• 2001-11-27 08:36 We Produce & Export high quality ultrasonic mist makers, Worldwide Agent Wanted
• 2001-11-27 08:37 We Produce & Export high quality ultrasonic mist makers, Worldwide Agent Wanted

Jeff Garzik

• 2001-11-07 07:47 relocation truncated to fit BRADDR text

Jeff Sturm

• 2001-11-10 21:35 Re: libGCJ
• 2001-11-12 21:20 Re: libstdc++ bus errors
• 2001-11-12 21:59 Re: libstdc++ bus errors
• 2001-11-16 10:31 Bootstrap failures with today's CVS
• 2001-11-18 11:02 Re: ObjC tree inlining
• 2001-11-18 11:46 Re: Bootstrap failures with today's CVS
• 2001-11-19 08:35 Re: Use of -fno-exceptions
• 2001-11-19 11:40 Re: Use of -fno-exceptions
• 2001-11-28 06:17 Re: Need some help with GCC
• 2001-11-29 06:03 Re: Top level configure unsupported targets
• 2001-11-29 08:11 Re: Top level configure unsupported targets

Jeffrey A Law

• 2001-11-20 16:20 Heap big badness on the 'Net today (fwd)

Jeffrey Oldham

• 2001-11-08 09:20 Re: Commas after "i.e." and "e.g." (was: Re: [Ada] gnat_rmtexi: Use @./@: where appropriate.)

Jerome Lovy

• 2001-11-13 04:06 pooma-gcc.tgz

Jerry van Dijk

• 2001-11-17 00:31 which branch to check out
• 2001-11-17 04:04 Re: which branch to check out
• 2001-11-18 15:32 building GNAT on Windows (without Cygwin)
• 2001-11-22 05:10 Native GNAT build succeeded
• 2001-11-22 13:14 Re: Native GNAT build succeeded
• 2001-11-23 17:38 mailbox crash
• 2001-11-27 08:27 GNAT mingw32 build broken
• 2001-11-27 14:50 GNAT build still broken

Jimmy DeWitt

• 2001-11-15 16:20 PowerPC Inline assembler documentation

jitendra-kumar.swarnkar

• 2001-11-12 19:41 GCC Ver 1.40

Joe Buck

• 2001-11-01 08:21 Re: Buffer Overflow Attacks
• 2001-11-01 08:25 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-01 08:28 Re: general question/suggestion
• 2001-11-01 08:32 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-02 11:35 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-02 15:25 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-05 15:31 Re: X IDE for gcc?
• 2001-11-06 14:56 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)
• 2001-11-07 19:06 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)
• 2001-11-19 07:28 Re: Use of -fno-exceptions
• 2001-11-19 07:48 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-19 07:50 Re: Complex integer division
• 2001-11-19 07:53 Re: Deprecating -traditional has passed the SC
• 2001-11-19 07:56 Re: Deprecating -traditional has passed the SC
• 2001-11-19 11:15 Re: Use of -fno-exceptions
• 2001-11-19 11:27 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-27 14:53 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-27 16:13 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 09:11 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 09:16 Re: debugging gcc
• 2001-11-28 12:26 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 12:43 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-29 09:35 Re: Using throw(): to use or not to use?
• 2001-11-29 11:51 Re: GCC 3.0.3
• 2001-11-29 11:51 Re: Using throw(): to use or not to use?
• 2001-11-29 12:22 Re: urgent help 2
• 2001-11-29 13:46 Re: Using throw(): to use or not to use?
• 2001-11-29 13:51 Re: GCC 3.0.3
• 2001-11-29 16:15 Re: GCC 3.0.3
• 2001-11-29 19:00 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 10:22 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 11:01 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 11:20 fix for PR 4447: is this really correct?
• 2001-11-30 16:20 Re: fix for PR 4447: is this really correct?
• 2001-11-30 17:12 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:

Joe Graham

• 2001-11-13 14:36 precompiler implementation help
• 2001-11-14 21:19 gcc-2.95.3-5 on cygwin compilation problem
• 2001-11-15 09:51 cygwin gcc issues

Joel Sherrill

• 2001-11-30 15:30 Re: [Ada] Q about building cross gnatlib

Joern Rennecke

• 2001-11-11 07:02 Re: Reload bug on Sparc
• 2001-11-13 01:30 Re: ia64 c++ abi exception handling

John David Anglin

• 2001-11-13 19:54 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/ is stuck at Nov. 12
• 2001-11-16 13:49 Re: VMS status
• 2001-11-27 10:32 Question about SUBREG handling in get_last_value
• 2001-11-27 16:10 Re: Question about SUBREG handling in get_last_value
• 2001-11-27 18:14 Re: Question about SUBREG handling in get_last_value

johnson

• 2001-11-02 12:47 >>§Ú­n¶R¥¼¤W¥«ªÑ²¼<<

Josef Zlomek

• 2001-11-26 04:44 configure: error: unable to detect exception model
• 2001-11-26 06:43 Re: configure: error: unable to detect exception model
• 2001-11-26 07:04 Re: configure: error: unable to detect exception model
• 2001-11-26 07:28 Re: configure: error: unable to detect exception model
• 2001-11-28 02:00 Re: configure: error: unable to detect exception model
• 2001-11-28 02:08 Re: configure: error: unable to detect exception model

Joseph S. Myers

• 2001-11-02 15:42 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-02 15:42 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-03 04:43 Re: backup schedule on FSF machines
• 2001-11-03 12:56 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-05 00:44 Re: Built-in bzero in GCC 3.0.2
• 2001-11-06 14:36 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)
• 2001-11-07 01:04 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)
• 2001-11-07 03:58 Re: [Ada] GNAT maintainer
• 2001-11-07 04:08 Commas after "i.e." and "e.g." (was: Re: [Ada] gnat_rmtexi: Use@./@: where appropriate.)
• 2001-11-07 04:17 Re: [Ada] Nag screen
• 2001-11-09 03:08 Re: questionable C error message for aggregate initializers?
• 2001-11-11 09:41 mkinstalldirs
• 2001-11-11 13:50 Who is "--mew" (comments in manual from 1993)?
• 2001-11-12 08:14 Spelling of "readonly" (was: Re: [patches] Re: KDE a gcc)
• 2001-11-12 13:47 Re: mkinstalldirs
• 2001-11-12 15:13 The brik tarball in infrastructure
• 2001-11-12 17:21 gcc/doschk.c
• 2001-11-13 16:24 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-16 11:09 VMS status
• 2001-11-17 09:56 Re: Deprecating -traditional has passed the SC
• 2001-11-17 10:54 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-17 15:24 Complex integer division
• 2001-11-18 08:48 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-18 12:41 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-19 04:45 Re: Complex integer division
• 2001-11-19 07:56 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 07:58 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 08:01 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 08:34 Re: Bugzilla features
• 2001-11-19 09:53 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-19 10:59 Re: Bugzilla features
• 2001-11-19 12:39 Re: Complex integer division
• 2001-11-19 12:54 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 00:56 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 17:03 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 17:03 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 17:17 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 01:05 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 01:07 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 03:14 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 03:20 Re: Yesterday's testcases
• 2001-11-21 07:09 Re: gccadmin account: scripts vs maintainer-scripts
• 2001-11-21 13:09 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 15:16 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 15:18 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 15:20 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 16:13 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-23 03:42 Cross-compilation documentation
• 2001-11-23 16:03 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 16:27 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 05:14 Compound literals extensions
• 2001-11-24 17:33 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 15:17 Semantics of CONSTRUCTOR tree nodes
• 2001-11-26 15:45 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-26 17:04 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-26 17:32 Re: Semantics of CONSTRUCTOR tree nodes
• 2001-11-27 12:44 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 13:27 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 15:57 Re: GNAT build still broken
• 2001-11-27 18:24 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-29 04:44 Regression tester v. runtime libraries
• 2001-11-30 18:35 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:

Joshua A Singer

• 2001-11-21 16:42 list of known bugs for gcc
• 2001-11-26 09:19 list of known bugs

Joy Mukherjee

• 2001-11-01 16:17 BSS size
• 2001-11-01 19:13 Re: BSS size
• 2001-11-01 21:52 Storage of uninitialised globals
• 2001-11-14 19:55 fPIC and %ebx
• 2001-11-14 20:06 User level threads
• 2001-11-14 20:40 Re: User level threads

JR

• 2001-11-11 12:14 Personal Invitation - PassivePROFITS(tm) - Residual Wealth Made Easy(tm)

kabir.patel

• 2001-11-19 04:18 RE: C compiler

Kai Henningsen

• 2001-11-10 17:59 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make

Kai Wang

• 2001-11-02 02:36 cc & gcc
• 2001-11-04 21:16 problem of compiling gcc on Solaris

kan zheng

• 2001-11-23 13:41 How to find the phototype of function "drand48()"

Karl Fogel

• 2001-11-21 15:52 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 15:56 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2001-11-04 21:31 Re: Built-in bzero in GCC 3.0.2
• 2001-11-05 05:47 Re: Built-in bzero in GCC 3.0.2
• 2001-11-05 05:54 Re: Built-in bzero in GCC 3.0.2
• 2001-11-17 06:33 Deprecating -traditional has passed the SC
• 2001-11-17 20:34 Re: Deprecating -traditional has passed the SC
• 2001-11-18 18:40 Can hex numbers appear as a const_int in md files?

Kazu Hirata

• 2001-11-09 13:56 A new maintainer of the h8 port

Kevin Atkinson

• 2001-11-02 10:46 Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-02 15:35 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-03 19:14 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-03 23:56 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 03:49 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 03:49 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 03:57 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 11:23 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-07 06:47 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII

krelisNet

• 2001-11-07 13:25 build on cygwin 2.78.2.13 of gcc-3.0.2 required code changes

Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

• 2001-11-30 23:02 Re: fix for PR 4447: is this really correct?

Kris Warkentin

• 2001-11-29 11:41 P.R. 4913

krish K

• 2001-11-09 12:56 Help: libstdc++-2.8.0 and malloc

Kumar Gala

• 2001-11-13 06:05 pfstream ?
• 2001-11-13 13:46 Re: pfstream ?

Lars Brinkhoff

• 2001-11-12 03:07 change_address
• 2001-11-20 02:46 Re: change_address

law

• 2001-11-02 14:14 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-02 14:57 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-09 14:55 PA & H8 maintainers
• 2001-11-13 08:23 Re: scavanging a reg
• 2001-11-13 09:48 Re: scavanging a reg
• 2001-11-21 15:14 Re: Somebody needs to fix the tmp permissions
• 2001-11-22 13:34 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available

Layne Meier

• 2001-11-28 05:52 Need some help with GCC

Leach, David

• 2001-11-12 08:57 getting gcc

LHelldorf

• 2001-11-16 07:07 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++

Linus Torvalds

• 2001-11-08 08:43 Re: Combine versus volatile (Was: Re: Performance of IntegerMultiplication on PIII)
• 2001-11-16 09:26 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability

liu090

• 2001-11-11 23:18 want get gcc compiler

lochas

• 2001-11-29 08:25 [Fwd: linux binary??]
• 2001-11-29 08:26 [Fwd: linux binary??]

Loren James Rittle

• 2001-11-05 15:45 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?

lucier

• 2001-11-10 20:13 new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-27 17:27 bootstrap failure on alpha

M. R. Brown

• 2001-11-01 02:25 Re: When will I be able to compile 8139too.c

Mail Delivery Subsystem

• 2001-11-26 03:25 Returned mail: User unknown
• 2001-11-26 03:25 Returned mail: User unknown

Marc Espie

• 2001-11-01 15:35 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-02 00:08 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-02 07:20 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-08 12:58 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)
• 2001-11-21 14:26 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1

Marc Schafer

• 2001-11-21 00:31 -fprofile-arcs

Mark Mitchell

• 2001-11-03 17:38 Re: [wwwdocs] Initial criteria.html (was Re: Where's the currentlist of release criteria?)
• 2001-11-04 20:58 Re: questions on writing a back-end' to gcc
• 2001-11-04 21:18 Re: Built-in bzero in GCC 3.0.2
• 2001-11-06 07:31 Re: NLS, attribute errors via cpp during bootstrap
• 2001-11-06 07:33 Re: ABI FAQ (was Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0)
• 2001-11-09 02:05 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-09 11:32 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-09 12:24 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-16 21:21 GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-17 11:19 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-19 13:41 Re: branch merging
• 2001-11-19 14:19 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-19 17:14 Re: Enough already! (Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++ )
• 2001-11-19 20:50 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-19 21:39 Objective-C++
• 2001-11-21 13:56 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-24 14:25 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 17:15 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 00:41 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 00:42 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 11:55 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-27 14:36 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes foraltivec)
• 2001-11-27 15:32 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-27 20:40 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes foraltivec)
• 2001-11-28 09:45 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes foraltivec)
• 2001-11-28 11:31 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes foraltivec)
• 2001-11-28 15:17 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom
• 2001-11-28 21:46 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom
• 2001-11-29 10:24 GCC 3.0.3
• 2001-11-29 12:28 Re: GCC 3.0.3
• 2001-11-29 13:58 GCC 3.0.3: Bugs to Fix
• 2001-11-29 14:25 Re: GCC 3.0.3
• 2001-11-29 17:10 Re: GCC 3.0.3: Bugs to Fix
• 2001-11-29 17:16 Re: GCC 3.0.3

Markus Grabert

• 2001-11-15 08:02 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++

Martin Brecher

• 2001-11-13 16:21 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++

Martin Kahlert

• 2001-11-04 22:24 Undefined asm labels during bootstrap on Solaris
• 2001-11-08 01:35 Re: GCC backend for dummy ?
• 2001-11-13 07:18 Re: Bug in cse? (Or in LABEL_PRESERVE_P?)
• 2001-11-23 04:04 Is this a known problem?

Martin v. Loewis

• 2001-11-12 15:03 Committing translations
• 2001-11-19 14:56 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-20 00:33 Is 64 bit ObjC for SolarisSparc available?

mascmail

• 2001-11-17 15:20 dead ftp

Mathieu Chouinard

• 2001-11-13 13:41 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++

Matthew H Bemis

• 2001-11-26 10:40 BUILD Failing
• 2001-11-28 06:16 ios.lo complilation promblems
• 2001-11-30 11:10 Missing Directory in CVS tree

Matthew P. Barnson

• 2001-11-19 06:17 Re: Bugzilla features
• 2001-11-19 09:05 Re: Bugzilla features

Matthias Benkmann

• 2001-11-15 15:52 boostrapping Ada

Maxim Dementiev

• 2001-11-29 05:13 Using throw(): to use or not to use?
• 2001-11-30 00:04 Using throw(): continue with "simple code"...

Michael Duckwitz

• 2001-11-18 16:49 Another Successfull Build

Michael Eager

• 2001-11-06 12:01 Re: BSS size

Michael McQuinn

• 2001-11-01 12:04 variable argument list in irix

michael.shapiro

• 2001-11-14 13:27 gcc options
• 2001-11-19 13:53 GNU compiler options for ODBc

Michal Moskal

• 2001-11-24 04:45 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c

Microsoft Wish Program

• 2001-11-26 03:35 Thank you for your product suggestion

Mike Lawrie

• 2001-11-20 04:44 i386-unknown-freebsd4.2 and gcc-3.0

mike stump

• 2001-11-02 13:11 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 13:23 Re: cc & gcc
• 2001-11-02 14:21 Re: Generating an interface description for libraries
• 2001-11-05 10:31 Re: dangerous cleverness? ppc int<->float conversions, subreg
• 2001-11-08 10:30 Re: Combine versus volatile (Was: Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII)
• 2001-11-10 10:51 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-11 07:07 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-13 10:54 Re: gcc executable for different OS revisions
• 2001-11-13 11:16 Re: C compiler
• 2001-11-15 11:32 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-15 17:08 Re: PowerPC Inline assembler documentation
• 2001-11-15 18:02 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-15 19:37 Re: Backward Compatibility of Gcc complier
• 2001-11-23 17:42 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 17:46 Re: How to find the phototype of function "drand48()"
• 2001-11-24 20:19 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 21:15 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 12:54 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 13:29 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 14:51 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 19:52 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 18:12 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 19:00 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-28 13:27 bootstrap problem with libjava
• 2001-11-28 15:42 Re: bootstrap problem with libjava
• 2001-11-29 17:04 Re: How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler
• 2001-11-30 15:23 Re: fix for PR 4447: is this really correct?
• 2001-11-30 16:59 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 17:49 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 18:14 Re: fix for PR 4447: is this really correct?

Momchil Velikov

• 2001-11-17 06:09 i386 flags register clober in inline assembly

Mongolia 030

• 2001-11-27 03:04 (Get your Bachelors, Masters or PhD right now)
• 2001-11-27 03:05 (YOU WANT A BETTER)
• 2001-11-27 03:06 (DOWNLOAD YOUR COPY NOW . . .)
• 2001-11-27 03:08 (Lower your monthly debt payments up to 60%)
• 2001-11-27 03:19 (True Flate Rate Unlimited Long Distance Calling)
• 2001-11-27 03:20 (Reduce Debt Payments up to 60%)
• 2001-11-27 03:21 (Bad To Perfect Credit In 30 Days! Or Your Money Back!)
• 2001-11-27 03:21 (You're Approved! Up To $2,500 Visa/Mastercard!)
• 2001-11-27 03:23 (Get ahead with the University Degree Program)
• 2001-11-27 03:27 (WIN BIG! EXCITING GAMES! CASINO ACTION!)

msdn

• 2001-11-26 03:56 RE: CST50044484ID - pHdesktop&#402;t&#402;&#8220;&#402;v&#402;&#8249;desktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktop&#402;t&#402;&#8220;&#402;v&#402;&#8249;desktopdesktopdesktop&#402;t&#402;&#8220;&#402;v&#402;&#8249;&#402;t&#402;&#8220;&#402;v&#402;&#8249;desktopdesktopdesktop&#402;t&#402;

Mueller-Zimmermann Bernd

• 2001-11-26 02:22 gcc version 2.95.2: Internal compiler error in `fix_lexical_addr', at function.c:5604

muhammad danish samad

• 2001-11-26 22:37 debugging gcc

Nathan Sidwell

• 2001-11-28 01:00 Re: covariant returns
• 2001-11-30 01:40 Re: GCC 3.0.3: Bugs to Fix
• 2001-11-30 09:10 Re: __cxa_pure_virtual

Naveen Sharma

• 2001-11-26 22:53 RE: debugging gcc

nbecker

• 2001-11-01 05:24 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 05:25 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 05:34 definition of complex norm
• 2001-11-13 10:32 warning: Arc profiling: some edge counts were bad.

Neil Booth

• 2001-11-01 14:29 Limit unnamed fields in structs / unions
• 2001-11-04 03:04 Re: Compile time error
• 2001-11-07 10:39 Re: langhooks-def.h and langhooks.h
• 2001-11-07 12:21 Re: CPP + Debug Info chicken-and-egg problem
• 2001-11-07 12:23 Re: CPP + Debug Info chicken-and-egg problem
• 2001-11-10 04:09 CVS down?
• 2001-11-15 06:40 Re: Build failure on Alpha
• 2001-11-17 10:04 Re: Potential GC problem in preprocessed C++
• 2001-11-17 10:37 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-18 04:49 ObjC tree inlining
• 2001-11-18 08:50 Re: precompiled headers in gcc 3.1?
• 2001-11-18 08:59 Re: ObjC tree inlining
• 2001-11-18 09:18 Re: ObjC tree inlining
• 2001-11-19 12:44 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-19 13:24 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 23:47 Yesterday's testcases
• 2001-11-23 10:56 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 11:14 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 15:52 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 16:20 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 03:30 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 03:38 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 15:02 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 03:50 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 04:02 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 05:06 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 05:23 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 05:33 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 06:34 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 12:25 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-27 15:01 c: static constructors and destructors
• 2001-11-28 11:06 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 12:45 Re: Input Stream Rewriting (Was: Target-specific Front-Ends?)
• 2001-11-28 13:57 Re: Input Stream Rewriting (Was: Target-specific Front-Ends?)

Nick Burrett

• 2001-11-13 08:53 Re: Bug in cse? (Or in LABEL_PRESERVE_P?)

Nick Clifton

• 2001-11-13 08:01 Re: arm/thumb bugs
• 2001-11-13 08:02 Re: [arm/thumb] bug in machine description
• 2001-11-29 09:39 Re: Oddities in ARM (stack handling)

Nicola Pero

• 2001-11-13 18:09 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-20 03:19 Re: Enough already! (Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++ )

NIIBE Yutaka

• 2001-11-08 22:46 RELOAD: Spill in to the index register

Norberto Bensa

• 2001-11-18 16:59 Re: Another Successfull Build
• 2001-11-18 18:04 Re: Join List?

Nuno Filipe R. Ferreira

• 2001-11-30 06:57 undefined reference __eh_pc

Olivier Hainque

• 2001-11-19 03:11 Re: Problem with Ada working on Linux PowerPC port
• 2001-11-27 09:26 Problem with recent fixes in loop_iterations ?
• 2001-11-29 01:35 Re: Problem with recent fixes in loop_iterations ?

Ovidiu Predescu

• 2001-11-13 15:35 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-15 17:25 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-18 22:02 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-19 14:26 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-19 14:46 Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++)
• 2001-11-19 14:58 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++

oy

• 2001-11-10 01:14 ÓòÃû×¢²á£¬Ö÷»ú×âÓã¬Ò»¸ö¹ú¼Ê¶¥¼¶ÓòÃû+200MÖ÷»úÖ»Ðè148Ôª

Paolo Carlini

• 2001-11-01 03:02 Re: Newbie question on -Os
• 2001-11-05 04:22 Re: C and assembly listing
• 2001-11-05 08:16 Re: C and assembly listing
• 2001-11-05 10:41 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-17 01:33 Re: which branch to check out
• 2001-11-18 02:51 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-19 05:14 C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 05:36 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 06:04 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 06:26 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 07:13 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 08:02 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 08:31 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-19 09:14 Re: C99 library issues
• 2001-11-20 17:57 Re: Partial optimization
• 2001-11-22 05:03 Re: x86 FP optimizer behaviour
• 2001-11-23 16:49 Re: How to find the phototype of function "drand48()"
• 2001-11-26 14:13 Re: Downgrade unsuccessfull

Paul Koning

• 2001-11-20 11:05 anoncvs access
• 2001-11-21 13:41 Re: anoncvs access

Paul_Brannon

• 2001-11-16 10:35 A quick question about find_last_not_of

Paulo J. Matos aka PDestroy

• 2001-11-01 02:02 When will I be able to compile 8139too.c
• 2001-11-10 03:24 Re: GCC backend for dummy ?
• 2001-11-10 03:28 Re: problems with math.h of gcc
• 2001-11-25 05:22 Re: a.out file format
• 2001-11-25 11:26 Downgrading
• 2001-11-26 13:36 Downgrade unsuccessfull

Per Bothner

• 2001-11-17 11:20 Re: Deprecating -traditional has passed the SC
• 2001-11-19 16:13 Re: Enough already! (Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++ )
• 2001-11-20 13:20 Re: Enough already! (Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++ )
• 2001-11-22 13:51 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-22 23:45 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-25 10:27 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 14:33 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 14:50 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 16:13 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 16:48 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 14:58 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 17:13 Re: Semantics of CONSTRUCTOR tree nodes
• 2001-11-26 17:56 Re: Semantics of CONSTRUCTOR tree nodes
• 2001-11-27 09:20 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 11:16 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 17:35 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 18:27 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 19:59 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-28 12:36 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 22:25 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-30 16:29 Re: qcc configuration

Perry E. Metzger

• 2001-11-02 07:15 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-02 10:12 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-02 11:32 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make

pete

• 2001-11-01 06:03 Re: successful GCC 3.0.2 install
• 2001-11-03 07:47 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-04 07:33 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-04 09:09 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 07:18 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-05 07:30 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (gcc-2.95.2 onP6)
• 2001-11-05 07:37 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-05 07:46 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-05 09:58 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-05 10:06 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-05 10:59 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95& Athlon)
• 2001-11-05 11:12 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95& Athlon)
• 2001-11-06 07:54 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Start-up fileoddities)
• 2001-11-06 08:20 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII (Results forgcc-2.95 & Athlon)
• 2001-11-27 10:20 RE: GNU Fortran inquiry
• 2001-11-28 08:56 Re: GNU Fortran inquiry

Peter Barada

• 2001-11-15 13:20 Re: adding bit test instructions for ColdFire
• 2001-11-15 14:55 Troubles reloading in gcc-2.95.3
• 2001-11-29 13:29 Re: code inefficiencies on 68k/coldfire

Peter Schmid

• 2001-11-02 10:30 Cannot bootstrap gcc on the mainline

Phil

• 2001-11-11 21:26 gcc or ld ?

Phil Edwards

• 2001-11-01 07:19 Re: Change definition of complex::norm
• 2001-11-01 08:37 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-02 14:09 auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-02 14:21 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-02 15:56 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-02 16:13 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-03 12:19 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-03 12:39 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-07 11:44 Re: CPP + Debug Info chicken-and-egg problem
• 2001-11-12 17:53 Re: getting gcc
• 2001-11-12 18:39 Re: CVS down?
• 2001-11-13 14:52 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-14 10:25 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/ is stuck at Nov. 12
• 2001-11-19 09:18 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-19 09:19 Re: Using GNATS to track GCC patches
• 2001-11-19 09:26 Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 10:10 Re: G++ Installation
• 2001-11-20 13:36 Re: anoncvs access
• 2001-11-20 16:20 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 17:09 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 17:24 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 13:12 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 13:31 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 13:33 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-21 13:43 Somebody needs to fix the tmp permissions
• 2001-11-21 14:00 Re: gccadmin account: scripts vs maintainer-scripts
• 2001-11-21 14:27 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-23 18:26 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-27 14:58 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-28 11:20 Re: GCC Build Status for SCO OS 5.0.5
• 2001-11-29 08:49 Re: GCC Build Status for SCO OS 5.0.5
• 2001-11-29 08:50 Re: Regression tester v. runtime libraries
• 2001-11-29 08:55 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-29 11:04 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-29 17:54 Re: libstdc++v3 configuration
• 2001-11-29 17:58 Re: ICE outputting unaligned fp constant on powerpc-apple-darwin5.1
• 2001-11-29 17:59 Re: thread safety
• 2001-11-30 11:35 Re: __cxa_pure_virtual
• 2001-11-30 17:02 Re: undefined reference __eh_pc

Philip Blundell

• 2001-11-01 12:55 Re: duplicate -mdisable-got with gcc-3.0
• 2001-11-01 23:50 Re: duplicate -mdisable-got with gcc-3.0
• 2001-11-12 11:35 Re: arm/thumb bugs
• 2001-11-21 13:12 Re: How to take the address of a label_ref?

pierre

• 2001-11-07 23:28 GCC backend for dummy ?
• 2001-11-08 07:34 Re: GCC backend for dummy ?

POP Sebastian

• 2001-11-21 13:56 [G95-develop] G95 AST representation

Rafael Rodríguez Velilla

• 2001-11-07 04:00 long_call attribute in C++

Rafal Boni

• 2001-11-14 12:43 MIPS _mcount-based profiling doesn't work with -abicalls (2.95.3)
• 2001-11-14 17:34 Re: MIPS _mcount-based profiling doesn't work with -abicalls (2.95.3)

Rainer Orth

• 2001-11-29 06:12 Re: Top level configure unsupported targets

Rakshit Karnavat , Gurgaon

• 2001-11-27 23:58 GCC Build Status for SCO OS 5.0.5
• 2001-11-28 07:39 RE: GCC Build Status for SCO OS 5.0.5
• 2001-11-28 22:07 RE: GCC Build Status for SCO OS 5.0.5

Ralf Habacker

• 2001-11-14 08:05 c++ name mangling question
• 2001-11-15 01:44 RE: c++ name mangling question
• 2001-11-15 12:07 AW: c++ name mangling question

Ralph Schmidt

• 2001-11-02 02:49 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers

Raymond.Chao

• 2001-11-15 19:05 Backward Compatibility of Gcc complier

reg

• 2001-11-15 10:36 ADA in gcc 3.1
• 2001-11-20 11:07 Continuing problems trying to build Ada

Reiner Knoebl

• 2001-11-19 03:26 Is 64 bit ObjC for SolarisSparc available?

Ricardo Bittencourt

• 2001-11-10 17:57 porting gcc to z80 machines

Richard Earnshaw

• 2001-11-01 08:30 Re: duplicate -mdisable-got with gcc-3.0
• 2001-11-02 04:00 Re: duplicate -mdisable-got with gcc-3.0

Richard Frith-Macdonald

• 2001-11-15 08:13 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-15 08:15 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++

Richard Henderson

• 2001-11-04 22:28 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-04 22:50 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-04 23:41 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-04 23:56 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-05 08:52 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-06 22:25 Re: ia64 performance regression
• 2001-11-06 23:53 Re: i386 RTX_COST tweeks take 2
• 2001-11-07 11:38 Re: REG_EH_REGION notes and substitutions into insn
• 2001-11-07 11:50 Re: i386 RTX_COST tweeks take 2
• 2001-11-07 17:10 Re: REG_EH_REGION notes and substitutions into insn
• 2001-11-07 17:26 Re: REG_EH_REGION notes and substitutions into insn
• 2001-11-08 14:41 Re: relocation truncated to fit BRADDR text
• 2001-11-09 16:43 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P question
• 2001-11-09 16:51 Re: const folding vs multiply-add
• 2001-11-10 09:40 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P question
• 2001-11-12 18:58 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-13 09:03 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insn prologues
• 2001-11-13 09:03 Re: ia64 c++ abi exception handling
• 2001-11-13 16:41 Re: bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-14 09:46 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-14 10:02 Re: Missing case in dwarf2out.c:loc_descriptor_from_tree
• 2001-11-14 10:06 Re: Bug in cse? (Or in LABEL_PRESERVE_P?)
• 2001-11-14 10:10 Re: scavanging a reg
• 2001-11-14 14:57 Re: bug(?): anonymous initialisers go in the .data section, not .rodata
• 2001-11-15 00:55 Re: fPIC and %ebx
• 2001-11-15 17:39 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-18 10:02 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-19 17:20 Re: include facility for .md files
• 2001-11-20 16:13 Re: help with combine
• 2001-11-20 16:13 Re: Exception handling problem: return address dead
• 2001-11-21 12:44 Re: How to take the address of a label_ref?
• 2001-11-21 12:44 Re: -fprofile-arcs
• 2001-11-21 15:59 Re: CLOBBER MEM in stack ops on x86
• 2001-11-21 16:13 Re: CLOBBER MEM in stack ops on x86
• 2001-11-22 16:00 Re: CLOBBER MEM in stack ops on x86
• 2001-11-24 12:41 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-25 12:23 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-25 15:52 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-25 17:58 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-25 23:22 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 13:49 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-26 14:13 Re: Exception handling problem: return address dead
• 2001-11-26 14:54 Re: BUILD Failing
• 2001-11-26 16:52 Re: "deferred strings" in varasm.c
• 2001-11-26 18:10 Re: Semantics of CONSTRUCTOR tree nodes
• 2001-11-26 19:50 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-26 23:18 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 00:02 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 10:29 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 12:58 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 13:40 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 13:44 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 13:53 Re: Problem with recent fixes in loop_iterations ?
• 2001-11-27 13:56 Re: Question about SUBREG handling in get_last_value
• 2001-11-27 14:01 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 14:27 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 15:16 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 15:19 Re: c: static constructors and destructors
• 2001-11-27 15:31 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-27 15:46 Re: CVS server
• 2001-11-27 16:21 Re: Question about SUBREG handling in get_last_value
• 2001-11-27 16:37 Re: Alpha bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-27 17:02 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 17:03 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 17:14 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 17:45 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 17:50 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-28 13:06 Re: IA64 failed to bootstrap (Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on
• 2001-11-28 23:16 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-29 09:53 Re: Problem with recent fixes in loop_iterations ?
• 2001-11-29 14:54 Re: Regression tester v. runtime libraries
• 2001-11-29 15:11 Re: C++ Unwind question (IA64 HP-UX)
• 2001-11-29 15:13 Re: GCC 3.0.3: Bugs to Fix
• 2001-11-29 16:52 Re: How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler
• 2001-11-29 18:37 Re: How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler
• 2001-11-30 15:28 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 15:50 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:

Richard Kenner

• 2001-11-07 04:45 langhooks-def.h and langhooks.h
• 2001-11-07 06:07 relaod1.c: fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2001-11-07 06:42 REG_EH_REGION notes and substitutions into insn
• 2001-11-07 12:19 Re: REG_EH_REGION notes and substitutions into insn
• 2001-11-07 17:18 Re: REG_EH_REGION notes and substitutions into insn
• 2001-11-08 04:16 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 06:37 Re: Combine versus volatile (Was: Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII)
• 2001-11-08 07:31 Re: relaod1.c: fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2001-11-08 07:32 Re: relaod1.c: fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2001-11-08 11:26 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 11:39 Re: Combine versus volatile (Was: Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII)
• 2001-11-08 13:03 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 13:22 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-08 13:38 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-09 14:15 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2001-11-10 02:03 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-10 17:27 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-10 17:47 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-11 02:28 Re: new benchmark times on alpha
• 2001-11-11 02:30 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-11 02:39 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-12 03:16 Re: change_address
• 2001-11-13 02:20 Missing case in dwarf2out.c:loc_descriptor_from_tree
• 2001-11-14 04:11 Re: [Ada] warning: file name does not match unit name
• 2001-11-15 04:55 Build failure on Alpha
• 2001-11-16 03:22 Re: Problem with Ada working on Linux PowerPC port
• 2001-11-16 03:42 Re: Last alignment change for MEM tracking
• 2001-11-16 09:10 Re: branch merging
• 2001-11-16 12:52 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-16 14:23 Re: [Ada] ada/Makefile.in question
• 2001-11-16 15:07 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-17 05:08 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-17 11:02 Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
• 2001-11-17 11:28 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-17 11:51 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-17 20:33 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 04:24 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 05:09 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 07:04 Re: branch merging
• 2001-11-18 18:16 FDESC_EXPR in tree.def
• 2001-11-19 14:38 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-19 15:25 Re: Cpp patches for VMS
• 2001-11-20 03:16 Re: change_address
• 2001-11-21 12:31 Still problems with CVS
• 2001-11-21 13:29 new cvs server problem
• 2001-11-21 13:41 CVS problem
• 2001-11-21 15:38 CLOBBER MEM in stack ops on x86
• 2001-11-21 16:00 Re: CLOBBER MEM in stack ops on x86
• 2001-11-21 18:24 Re: CLOBBER MEM in stack ops on x86
• 2001-11-25 04:23 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 05:13 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 05:25 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 06:29 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 06:42 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 13:44 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 14:37 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 15:01 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 15:13 Re: Loop optimization bug with Ada front end on PPC (and probably Alpha)
• 2001-11-25 16:24 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-25 17:22 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 03:15 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 03:44 Sparc bootstrap problem compiling unwind-dw2-fde.c
• 2001-11-26 13:36 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 15:49 "deferred strings" in varasm.c
• 2001-11-27 15:13 Re: GNAT build still broken
• 2001-11-27 15:23 CVS server
• 2001-11-27 16:39 Re: GNAT build still broken
• 2001-11-27 16:50 Re: CVS server
• 2001-11-28 08:07 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom
• 2001-11-28 09:43 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom
• 2001-11-28 18:23 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom
• 2001-11-29 04:05 Re: alpha bootstrap failure, new symptom
• 2001-11-29 04:26 Problem with top-level build
• 2001-11-29 05:02 Top level configure unsupported targets
• 2001-11-29 05:41 Re: Top level configure unsupported targets
• 2001-11-29 05:58 Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-29 06:31 libstdc++v3 configuration
• 2001-11-29 06:50 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-29 17:03 Re: libstdc++v3 configuration
• 2001-11-29 17:42 Re: How to defeat new check for presence of Ada compiler
• 2001-11-30 03:05 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-30 03:43 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-30 17:44 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-30 19:01 Re: Top-level Makefile

Robert Boucher

• 2001-11-25 00:10 Testing 2.95.3 & 2.95 branch

Robert Lipe

• 2001-11-04 07:12 new breakage on 3.0branch
• 2001-11-04 09:58 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-04 18:48 NLS, attribute errors via cpp during bootstrap
• 2001-11-05 05:23 Re: NLS, attribute errors via cpp during bootstrap
• 2001-11-05 14:20 Re: NLS, attribute errors via cpp during bootstrap
• 2001-11-28 06:28 Re: GCC Build Status for SCO OS 5.0.5

Rochholz, Hermann

• 2001-11-12 00:57 gmake check on gcc

Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.

• 2001-11-05 17:33 Re: ABI FAQ (was Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0)

Ron Chen

• 2001-11-30 19:56 RE: GCC/Fortran 90/95 questions

Rupert Wood

• 2001-11-07 02:29 RE: Repost: Fail to compile 64 bit gcc 3.0.2

Russ Allbery

• 2001-11-06 16:51 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)

Russell Quinn

• 2001-11-06 03:18 Dwarf1

S. Bosscher

• 2001-11-04 17:43 Re: Writing a frontend to GCC
• 2001-11-27 12:23 Re: GNU Fortran inquiry

Sam TH

• 2001-11-21 13:59 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)

Sang Beng Ng

• 2001-11-01 22:41 Assembly (.s) file does not match Motorola .asm syntax

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta

• 2001-11-05 03:47 C and assembly listing

Santi

• 2001-11-18 17:57 Join List?

Sarel Theron

• 2001-11-13 02:48 Help please?

Scott A Crosby

• 2001-11-12 17:57 Re: Basic block profiling (-a) does produce wrong code for insnprologues

Sean Callanan

• 2001-11-12 20:39 libstdc++ bus errors

Segher Boessenkool

• 2001-11-24 18:27 Re: Signal while compiling libvorbis

Simon Watts

• 2001-11-02 06:43 Generating an interface description for libraries

Sinisa Milivojevic

• 2001-11-30 06:58 __cxa_pure_virtual
• 2001-11-30 09:21 Re: __cxa_pure_virtual

Stan Shebs

• 2001-11-02 14:45 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-02 14:52 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-12 17:26 Re: gcc/doschk.c
• 2001-11-13 08:54 Re: ia64 c++ abi exception handling
• 2001-11-13 09:10 Re: ia64 c++ abi exception handling
• 2001-11-13 14:40 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-13 15:45 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-13 16:55 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-15 09:00 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-15 09:07 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-15 09:23 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-16 09:10 Re: Problem with relocation in reload1 on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2001-11-19 11:51 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-19 15:41 Re: Enough already! (Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++ )
• 2001-11-20 11:20 Re: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-21 14:38 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-26 22:22 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 09:48 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 12:57 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 14:20 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 14:50 Re: front end changes for altivec
• 2001-11-27 15:06 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 18:09 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 18:35 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-28 11:19 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-28 11:55 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-29 16:47 Re: ICE outputting unaligned fp constant on powerpc-apple-darwin5.1

Stefan Olsson

• 2001-11-16 11:49 [Fwd: Calling an allocator destroy?]
• 2001-11-26 07:20 -pthread

Stefan Seefeld

• 2001-11-16 08:26 extracting implicit arguments
• 2001-11-27 21:47 covariant returns

Stefan Urbanek

• 2001-11-19 13:53 ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++)

Stephane Aubert

• 2001-11-22 05:01 error when I building binutils under cygwin on win98 - take2

Stephane Carrez

• 2001-11-01 02:20 Re: [RFA]: Fix tests 980223.c and 20010327-1.c (was is 980223.c wrong?)
• 2001-11-02 12:25 Gcc 3.x regression in constant initializer [compile/20010327-1.c]
• 2001-11-30 11:27 Re: GCC 3.0.3

Stephano Mariani

• 2001-11-01 02:50 Newbie question on -Os
• 2001-11-03 11:35 AMD Athlon XP optimizations
• 2001-11-04 02:03 Writing a frontend to GCC
• 2001-11-05 08:18 Re: C and assembly listing

Stephen Clarke

• 2001-11-08 15:28 MODES_TIEABLE_P question
• 2001-11-09 18:10 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P question

Stephen L Moshier

• 2001-11-15 18:47 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-16 08:12 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-17 08:05 Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
• 2001-11-20 04:57 Re: GCC and fast eveluaton of polynomials
• 2001-11-20 05:25 Re: GCC and fast eveluaton of polynomials

Steve Ellcey

• 2001-11-29 10:19 C++ Unwind question (IA64 HP-UX)
• 2001-11-30 14:33 New libtool for GCC 3.1?

Steven Bosscher

• 2001-11-10 16:59 Integrating a new front end
• 2001-11-18 10:28 G77 docs: `declaring new variables after generating code'
• 2001-11-30 11:28 Re: GCC/Fortran 90/95 questions

SUGIMOTO, Manabu

• 2001-11-21 00:24 Undefined reference

Syd Polk

• 2001-11-28 14:12 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)

Tariq D. Aslam

• 2001-11-30 09:35 GCC/Fortran 90/95 questions

temp

• 2001-11-15 23:58 T-shirts

The Morsbergers

• 2001-11-22 07:13 FW: Tru64 Help
• 2001-11-30 18:53 make problem on Tru64 4.0f

The Python Replybot

• 2001-11-26 03:24 Re: pÈdesktopƒtƒ“ƒvƒ‹desktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopdesktopƒtƒ“ƒvƒ‹desktopdesktop

Thomas Bennett

• 2001-11-08 13:28 Web page problem

Thomas Schilling

• 2001-11-24 07:44 reusing parts of gcc

Tibet Corporation

• 2001-11-27 02:54 (Save thousands of dollars in interest and late charges)

Tim Hollebeek

• 2001-11-28 16:15 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-30 14:59 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:

Tim Josling

• 2001-11-23 21:59 Re: Treelang frontend
• 2001-11-23 22:03 Re: Treelang frontend

Tim Prince

• 2001-11-01 06:06 Re: definition of complex norm
• 2001-11-02 15:21 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-02 22:37 Re: Want to learn more about inernals of gcc
• 2001-11-03 08:40 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-04 08:33 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 07:58 Re: Performance of Integer Multiplication on PIII
• 2001-11-05 07:58 Re: C and assembly listing
• 2001-11-10 07:29 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-15 12:44 Re: cygwin gcc issues
• 2001-11-17 09:40 Re: Deprecating -traditional has passed the SC
• 2001-11-21 06:46 Re: Undefined reference
• 2001-11-21 21:11 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-22 20:28 Re: gcc-ss-20011119 is now available
• 2001-11-27 14:42 Re: GNU Fortran inquiry

Timothy J. Wood

• 2001-11-19 10:23 Re: GCC and fast eveluaton of polynomials
• 2001-11-19 15:01 Enough already! (Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++ )

tm

• 2001-11-05 16:19 Re: C and assembly listing

Tom Tromey

• 2001-11-10 12:38 Bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-13 09:00 bootstrap failure
• 2001-11-23 14:13 -Wswitch and default case
• 2001-11-26 11:38 Unreviewed patches for 3.0.x
• 2001-11-28 14:34 Re: bootstrap problem with libjava
• 2001-11-29 07:52 Re: Top level configure unsupported targets

Toon Moene

• 2001-11-08 14:12 Re: [g77] make -k check fails last reporting
• 2001-11-11 14:16 Re: Warning in today's CVS
• 2001-11-11 14:16 Re: Integrating a new front end
• 2001-11-12 02:04 Re: GCC g77 mail address @gnu.org
• 2001-11-12 15:23 Re: gmake check on gcc
• 2001-11-13 00:01 Re: GCC g77 mail address @gnu.org
• 2001-11-13 16:47 Re: Mail archives (was: GCC g77 mail address @gnu.org)
• 2001-11-14 16:35 Re: Question about backspace command in gcc-g77-3.0.2
• 2001-11-15 13:20 A much needed simplification of g77 and libf2c's Makefiles.
• 2001-11-30 23:39 Re: GCC 3.0.3

Ulrich Drepper

• 2001-11-25 22:30 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?
• 2001-11-26 11:31 Re: Does --enable-clocale=gnu work on Linux/ia64?

Ulrich Kunitz

• 2001-11-08 14:46 questionable C error message for aggregate initializers?
• 2001-11-09 14:01 Re: questionable C error message for aggregate initializers?

Unruh, Erwin

• 2001-11-12 03:39 Re: ada/4848: Internal compiler error in instantiate_virtual_regs_1, at function.c:3904

Uros Bizjak

• 2001-11-12 23:25 Re: gcc executable for different OS revisions

usman yousaf

• 2001-11-26 08:18 urgent
• 2001-11-29 10:41 urgent help 2

Wang, Sheng (MED)

• 2001-11-13 13:08 question about encrypt

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2001-11-05 07:33 Bootstrap failure on Solaris7 in Intl code

Yahya Darboe

• 2001-11-30 16:19 qcc configuration

Youngjean Jung

• 2001-11-14 13:55 Question about backspace command in gcc-g77-3.0.2

Zack Weinberg

• 2001-11-01 12:34 Re: variable argument list in irix
• 2001-11-02 09:47 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2001-11-02 09:48 Re: Possible bug in gcc/Makefile.in
• 2001-11-02 10:03 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-02 10:04 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-02 10:45 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-02 10:51 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-02 14:04 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-02 21:28 Re: backup schedule on FSF machines
• 2001-11-02 23:00 Re: final install problems
• 2001-11-02 23:05 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-02 23:14 Re: Hi
• 2001-11-03 12:47 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-04 14:11 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-04 18:49 Re: auto-sync of top-level 'include' & 'config' directories?
• 2001-11-04 23:55 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-05 00:14 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-05 13:55 Re: NLS, attribute errors via cpp during bootstrap
• 2001-11-05 19:53 Re: GCC 3.0.2 and BSD Make
• 2001-11-06 19:46 Re: Patch to make generated manpages use GFDL (fwd)
• 2001-11-08 14:34 Re: [g77] make -k check fails last reporting
• 2001-11-11 10:13 Re: Integrating a new front end
• 2001-11-11 10:17 Re: Warning in today's CVS
• 2001-11-13 14:09 Re: question about encrypt
• 2001-11-16 10:51 Re: Bootstrap failures with today's CVS
• 2001-11-17 12:54 Re: target/4606 config.gcc refers to non-existant va-clipper.h
• 2001-11-17 14:16 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 10:29 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 11:10 Re: should MEM tracking be able to optimize this?
• 2001-11-18 13:27 Re: Bootstrap failures with today's CVS
• 2001-11-18 17:06 Re: Another Successfull Build
• 2001-11-20 17:26 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 18:08 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-20 18:29 powerpc freebsd-spec.h - huh?
• 2001-11-20 22:08 powerpc back end silly moves
• 2001-11-21 14:40 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 15:33 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 19:32 Re: Moving C to its own directory (was Re: ObjC tree inlining)
• 2001-11-21 22:25 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 22:52 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-21 23:26 Re: buildfailure in expr.c on darwin
• 2001-11-23 08:49 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-23 15:37 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 16:41 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 16:57 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 19:19 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-24 23:06 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 11:46 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 12:07 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-26 16:45 Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c
• 2001-11-29 09:11 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-30 10:26 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 15:37 Re: fdump-ast-original and strg:
• 2001-11-30 18:14 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-30 18:17 Re: Top-level Makefile
• 2001-11-30 20:16 Re: Top-level Makefile

Ziemowit Laski

• 2001-11-13 12:47 PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-13 16:04 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-19 11:55 Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-19 14:53 Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++)
• 2001-11-20 11:45 Re: Objective-C++
• 2001-11-21 13:47 Re: Somebody needs to fix the tmp permissions
• 2001-11-26 18:47 Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 12:24 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 12:34 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 12:41 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 13:19 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 13:21 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 14:30 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 14:50 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 15:37 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 18:06 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for altivec)
• 2001-11-27 19:40 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 11:55 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 12:01 Input Stream Rewriting (Was: Target-specific Front-Ends?)
• 2001-11-28 13:25 Re: Input Stream Rewriting (Was: Target-specific Front-Ends?)
• 2001-11-28 13:36 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for
• 2001-11-28 18:40 Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for

Ziying Sherwin

• 2001-11-02 06:46 fail to compile gcc 3.0.2 on Solaris 8
• 2001-11-05 12:09 Fail to compile 64 bit gcc 3.0.2
• 2001-11-06 10:11 Repost: Fail to compile 64 bit gcc 3.0.2

À̽ºÅ͵ð±×·ì

• 2001-11-16 19:26 ¹«·á ¾îÇп¬¼ö ¹× °æÇè´ã ÀåÇлý ¸ðÁý

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)