This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: i386 vs. .quad

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: i386 vs. .quad
From: Robert Lipe <robertlipe at usa dot net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 17:01:45 -0500
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20011019223056.A16782@rjlhome.caldera.com> <20011021193046.F12034@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

> > Jan, can you please make the behaviour of ASM_QUAD match that of the
> > comments and be sure that it's NOT used in a 32-bit build?  IMO, it
> I am working on it. Unfortunatelly pushing the ASM_OUTPUT macros to target

Thanx.

> > does not belong in att.h and it does not belong in sco5.h.  It's a gas
> > feature and belongs in a gas-specific place.
> Isn't there some AT&T standarized pseudo-op for that?

Not that I know of; why would there be?   Since this predates C99 with
'long long', it's really sort of useless for an assembler for a 32 bit
part to have such a concept.

RJL

References:
- i386 vs. .quad
  - From: Robert Lipe
- Re: i386 vs. .quad
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]