This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64

To: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
Subject: Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:55:56 +0200
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0109240805540.87797-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <200109242017.NAA09529@cygnus.com> <20010924142645.A2766@us.ibm.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:26:45PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> +None of the following versions of GCC has an ABI that is compatible
> +with any of the other versions in this list:
> +3.0.2, 3.0.1, 3.0, Red Hat 2.96, and Trillian 000717.

This is not entirely correct, I believe 2.96-RH is ABI compatible with
Trillian 000717 (2.96-RH/ia64 has the ia64 backend almost identical to
Trillian 000717, with a few bugfixes, plus the CVS snapshot the two
compilers are based on is very close (000717 and 000731), the patches which
were applied on top of 000731 do not change ABI).

Also, aren't 3.0/ia64 and 3.0.1/ia64 binary compatible too (no idea, just
wondering)?

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64
  - From: Jim Wilson

References:
- Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64
  - From: Janis Johnson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]