This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: MAINTAINERS policy question
- To: mrs at windriver dot com
- Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS policy question
- From: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 01:26:44 +0200
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Ecole Normale Superieure (quatramaran)
In article <200109180038.RAA27823@kankakee.wrs.com> you write:
>would be OK by the sony_news/mips maintainer. My wording also makes
>it clear that an FreeBSD maintainer can change the FreeBSD make file
>fragments, but not the Linux parts of the x86 files. Adding a
I'm looking at the 3.0.1 MAINTAINER list. There is no FreeBSD maintainer,
nor a Linux maintainer, nor an OpenBSD maintainer.
In fact, considering the current discussion, what's the interpretation of
`port' ? I don't think it's unnatural to consider it might mean `processor'
(current interpretation) but may also mean `os' or `processor+os'.
The area is fairly simple to define.
If I don't presume too much, I would like to be relisted a maintainer for
the OpenBSD ports (the OpenBSD specific part, of course, by your rules).