This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair?

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:09:00PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Without rematerialization,  or live range splitting, we'd spill twice
>> as much as we would before here.
>
> But reload _does_ do simple rematerialization.  See
> reg_equiv_constant.
Right, but it's very *simple* rematerialization.
I had some numbers somewhere that said we do so much better with
advanced remat it's not even funny, but i don't recall them exactly,
so i don't want to quote them.


>
>
>
> r~

-- 
"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore
looking like an idiot.
"-Steven Wright
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]