This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
doc/install.texi getting out-of-sync
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>, Hartmut Penner <hpenner at de dot ibm dot com>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- Subject: doc/install.texi getting out-of-sync
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:54:06 +0200 (CEST)
- cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Andrew, you caused the following in the CVS repository: This paragraph
seems to have duplicate information and there is a conflict marker; I
assume you resolved a CVS conflict the incorrect way?
1.51 (cagney 01-Aug-01): For Solaris 2.0 and 2.1, GCC needs six packag
1.51 (cagney 01-Aug-01): @samp{SUNWbtool}, @samp{SUNWesu}, @samp{SUNWh
1.51 (cagney 01-Aug-01): @samp{SUNWtoo}.
1.51 (cagney 01-Aug-01):
1.51 (cagney 01-Aug-01): =======
Would you mind fixing this?
Moreover, is powerpc-*-netbsd* also supported on the 3.0-branch? If so,
please move your corresponding patch to doc/install.texi there as well.
Hartmut, if you compare doc/install.texi on mainline with the 3.0-branch
you see the following differences:
2976c3023
< IBM S/390 system running Linux for S/390.
---
> S/390 system running Linux for S/390@.
2983c3030
< IBM zSeries system (64 bit) running Linux for zSeries.
---
> zSeries system (64 Bit) running Linux for zSeries@.
Would you mind unifying this?
John David, the following difference between mainline and 3.0-branch is
by you:
3193c3240
< Don't try compiling with Vax C (@code{vcc}). It produces incorrect code
---
> Don't try compiling with VAX C (@code{vcc}). It produces incorrect code
Woud you mind unifying this?
Gerald
PS: All patches to fix these issues are pre-approved.
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/