This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Simple returns are broken in gcc 3.X
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 04:43:15PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> It may not be necessary. I am trying to rework
> thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns to always output a return
> in the HAVE_return case.
Hum. We'll see. I still think you'd be better served adding the
epilogue pattern. It's clearer to categorize HAVE_return as the
optimization and HAVE_epilogue as the requirement.
r~