This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- To: aoliva at redhat dot com (Alexandre Oliva)
- Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 03:08:05 +0100 (BST)
- Cc: torvalds at transmeta dot com (Linus Torvalds), dewar at gnat dot com,moshier at moshier dot ne dot mediaone dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,tprince at computer dot org
> But we could use new tokens, say (( )) and ((( ))) to mark expressions
> the preprocessor and the compiler shouldn't muck up with. It would
It's hard to distinguish an opening (( from two opening (s that
are closes separately, e.g.:
a*((b+c)*d)
OTOH, you could re-use (abuse) statement expressions for this purpose:
({a+b;})*c