This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: decrement and branch optimization broken?
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Subject: Re: decrement and branch optimization broken?
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 17:42:04 +0200
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Roman Zippel <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>,Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, john at feith dot com
- References: <200107301501.LAA30944@makai.watson.ibm.com>
David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:
>>>>>> Jan Hubicka writes:
>
>Jan> But the review process of that work apparently got suck
>Jan> somewhere.
>
> A lot of patches are not being reviewed. I am not sure what the
> GCC SC should or can do about this. We really need all people with
> privileges to review patches for the area of the compiler they maintain.
Just a random thought:
Would it make sense to give special "Review rights" to some more
people? The review rights could be constrained.
With "Review rights" I mean: GCC Developer A is allowed to review and
ack other peoples work - but not his/her own to allow proper review of
A's work.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj