This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
"changing search order...."
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: "changing search order...."
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:28:46 -0400
When did this get added?
cc1plus: warning: changing search order for system directory "/home/pme/build/install-2001-07-05/include/g++-v3"
cc1plus: warning: as it is the same as system directory "/home/pme/build/T/include/g++-v3"
cc1plus: warning: changing search order for system directory "/home/pme/build/install-2001-07-05/include/g++-v3/i686-pc-linux-gnu"
cc1plus: warning: as it is the same as system directory "/home/pme/build/T/include/g++-v3/i686-pc-linux-gnu"
cc1plus: warning: changing search order for system directory "/home/pme/build/install-2001-07-05/include/g++-v3/backward"
cc1plus: warning: as it is the same as system directory "/home/pme/build/T/include/g++-v3/backward"
cc1plus: warning: changing search order for system directory "/home/pme/build/install-2001-07-05/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.1/include"
cc1plus: warning: as it is the same as system directory "/home/pme/build/T/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.1/include"
'T' is a symlink to 'install-2001-07-05'. The build was configured with a
--prefix involving install-2001-07-05, but the g++ driver was called through
the path involving T.
Are we intentionally trying to annoy people who use symlinks, or am I
using a local setup which we've decided to deprecate?
Phil
--
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC