This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken

To: neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk
Subject: Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 10:47:58 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20010520092334.B27658@daikokuya.demon.co.uk><20010520102316L.mitchell@codesourcery.com><20010520183710.A17889@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:

    Neil> Let me know what you'd like me to do.

Wait a week.  

If there hasn't been any objection to removing this feature, or if the
debate has moved in favor of removing it, consider the obvious
requisite patches preapproved.  Make sure we warn about no longer
supporting the warning and that you remove the description of the
warning from the manual.

If the verdict is that we need to keep this functionality, then you'll
have to reimplement the way I suggested, in order to fix the
regression introduced by your previous patch. :-(

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken
  - From: Neil Booth

References:
- [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [RFC] -Wid-clash-LEN broken
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]