This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Subject: Re: Java GC descriptor vs. tree_int_cst on 64-bit platforms
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: 04 Apr 2001 18:05:30 -0600
- Cc: "'Andrew Haley'" <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>, apbianco at cygnus dot com, "'java at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE7009027876644049B5D28@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
- Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <hans_boehm@hp.com> writes:
Hans> Here's what I sent to Andrew. This somewhat fixed the comment
Hans> that Fergus Henderson was worried about. And it includes the
Hans> change log.
Hans> In spite of the subject, this patch is related to the compiler
Hans> patch only in that both are necessary for gcj on Itanium.
Cool. I'll check this in as soon as I build it and try gctest.
BTW it is fine for you to commit changes to gcc/boehm-gc without
asking. The situation might be different on the branch, especially
once it gets to freeze status, but in general I feel certain nobody
around here knows more about the GC than you :-)
Tom