This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[fehrin@enigma.cys.de: Re: gcc-ss-20010402 is now available]
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: [fehrin@enigma.cys.de: Re: gcc-ss-20010402 is now available]
- From: fehrin at cys dot de
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:34:31 +0200
----- Forwarded message from fehrin@enigma.cys.de -----
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:33:37 +0200
From: fehrin@enigma.cys.de
To: law@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: gcc-ss-20010402 is now available
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <20010403001050.9564.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>; from law@sourceware.cygnus.com on Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:10:50AM -0000
> gcc-ss-20010319 is now available on
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/2001-03-19
Hello,
I downloaded gcc-ss-20010402 (the above is a typo, i presume) and made
the following observation:
The include files g++-v3/hash_map.h and g++-v3/hash_set.h contain the
include directives
#include <bits/stl_hashtable.h>
#include <bits/stl_hash_map.h>
resp.
#include <bits/stl_hashtable.h>
#include <bits/stl_hash_set.h>
But these files live in the ext subdirectory, not in bits.
As a side note, are there any objections against having hash_map and hash_set
in g++-v3 additionally to g++-v3/ext for backward compatibility?
Greetings
Franz Fehringer
----- End forwarded message -----