This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines)

To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Subject: Re: diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines)
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:00:43 -0500
Cc: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>, Colm Smyth <Colm dot Smyth at Sun dot COM>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200103131725.RAA04533@ireserver.Ireland.Sun.COM> <20010313193757.H4250@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20010314073846.A30622@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> <20010313233503.M4250@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:35:03PM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> Merging all these into just three functions, say
> cpp_diagnostic{_with_line,_with_line_and_file} that take a "severity"
> level (or level plus embedded flags like deprecated, extension) allows
> greater flexibility, both to GCC programmers and GCC users, whilst
> reducing code duplication at the same time.

I wonder whether the syslog(3) code from glibc is portable enough and sane
enough to use here.  :-)


Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.

References:
- Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines
  - From: Colm Smyth
- Re: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines
  - From: Neil Booth
- diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines)
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: diagnostics (was: GCC 3.0 Branch: Guidelines)
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]