This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: mknumeric_limits
- To: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: mknumeric_limits
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:54:24 -0800 (PST)
- cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdr at codesourcery dot com
Jeff, I will admit to not being totally on top of this bit of libstdc++-v3.
Gaby knows this code the best.
I think the bits you are talking to might be overly complex vestigual
elements from when libstdc++-v3 was a separate project. A new, simpler
approach might work. From looking at the ChangeLog-2000 entries for
mknumeric_limits it seems like the -nostdlib bits have always caused
problems for HPUX.
> > Sometimes we have to use g++ instead of gcc because of __cplusplus
> > defines in headers. That's the case for the acinclude.m4 bits.
> But I don't think that using gcc for just the link step would affect
> that. And using gcc instead of g++ would allow most (all?) of the crud
> in the switch statement I pointed out to go away.
Ok. Can you post a patch?
-benjamin