This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Java symbol mangling

To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Subject: Re: Java symbol mangling
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
References: <3A74C199.F74DA8A9@albatross.co.nz><Pine.BSF.4.32.0101311037200.90916-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-To: apbianco at cygnus dot com

Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> >> /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccqA2t6Imain.s", line 35: error: symbol "_ZN3gnu3gcj7convert7Convert6class$E" is used but not defined
> >> /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccqA2t6Imain.s": , approx line 35: internal error: evaluate_symbol_expression(): op 20?
> >> gmake[3]: *** [jv-convert] Error 1

I had problems like that two days ago. I ignored them, thoroughly
updated my entire source tree and the problem went away. A temporary
glitch somewhere else in the toolchain, I guess. 

I guess not all patches are tested building the Java bits, which is
understandable if they're produced on certain platforms we don't yet
support.

./A

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java symbol mangling
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- Re: Java symbol mangling
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java symbol mangling
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]