This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ patch]: virtual overriders and using
- To: Graham Stott <grahams at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [C++ patch]: virtual overriders and using
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 15:45:43 +0000
- CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <3A534066.57ACDB0B@codesourcery.com> <3A53428D.AF467DDA@redhat.com>
Graham Stott wrote:
> You forgot to update the copyright date.
You are correct, in that I did forget all about the copyright date.
However, I prepared this patch in December. so doesn't
> This list is *not* a list of years in which versions were released. It
> is a list of years in which versions, later released, were *completed*.
apply?
It occurs to me that the word `release' in the email from Ian that
Jeff forwarded, might have some legal meaning like 'make available to
the public' (i.e cvs commit), rather than mean a 'formal release' in the
open source sense?
With free software what does 'release' mean wrt copyright dates?
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org