This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RANLIB_TEST in gcc/Makefile?

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: RANLIB_TEST in gcc/Makefile?
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras at softhome dot net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 12:15:56 +0100
CC: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <3A525C2D.B1CFED47@softhome.net> <or3df19lsu.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <200101030651.BAA04724@envy.delorie.com> <orpui585yf.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> We generally wouldn't use a just-built ranlib for host, but for
> target.  And that's RANLIB_FOR_TARGET, not RANLIB.  So I think
> Laurynas' upcoming patch would be Ok :-)

Stay tuned :-) Later I think will set RANLIB_FOR_TARGET in configure too,
by looking for binutils source files in an unified tree.

Laurynas

References:
- RANLIB_TEST in gcc/Makefile?
  - From: Laurynas Biveinis
- Re: RANLIB_TEST in gcc/Makefile?
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: RANLIB_TEST in gcc/Makefile?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: RANLIB_TEST in gcc/Makefile?
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]