This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd)
- To: mmckinlay at gnu dot org, tege at swox dot com
- Subject: Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd)
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:55:05 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: bje at cygnus dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, user42 at zip dot com dot au
<<One word: Trademarks :-)
>>
Isn't i386 also trademarked?
Do the trademarks really cause a problem, we have a compiler for Pentium,
I see no reason not to say so. I suppose somewhere we would have to say
"Trademarks are the property of their respective companies". Is that
objectionable.
I always found the dubious use of ix86 for large values of x with arbitrary
correspondence to Pentium architectures to be dubious, and the situation
gets mjore confusing with clones!