This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, law at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 08:13:33 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
<<I think that a lot of the "ia32" references have been typos for "ia64".
>>
Indeed, and that was my fault, although the typo did yield the interesting
information that the ia32 work had been done under non-disclosure, which
sure seems very strange to me. As I say, at ACT we have a policy of not
doing any work on GPL'ed software that is restricted by NDA's (we of course
have NDA'
s in place with some companies to protect confidential data, such as
customer code, but this never applies to GPL'ed code).