This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
- Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- From: David Starner <dvdeug at x8b4e516e dot dhcp dot okstate dot edu>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:08:46 -0600
- Cc: law at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rms at gnu dot org
- References: <10011020154.AA05910@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
- Reply-To: David Starner <dstarner98 at aasaa dot ofe dot org>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:54:07PM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> Yes, but again, this is only relevent if there *are* a set of "GNU Ada
> developers". I don't see any evidence of such a group at this point.
> Sure, when the sources are in the GCC tree, it will encourage such,
> but I don't expect that to make any difference whatsoever.
>
> Are you aware of any GNU Ada developers "in the wings" out there?
There's always the GNAT for DOS people.
--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
If you wish to strive for peace of soul then believe;
if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche