gcc archive
date index for November, 2000

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2000
23:59 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
23:52 2.95.3 fix request: inline asm in C++ templates fix Hidvegi
23:19 Adapting switch(x){case(y):...} with hashing Andy Walker
20:18 Re: perfered ELF debugging format for GNU tools Daniel Berlin
20:09 Re: [RFA] rtl.texi (was Re: "OImode" ?) Richard Henderson
18:58 Analysis of Brad's GCSE problem with computed gotos. Michael Matz
17:15 Re: gcc-2.95.2 hang with cpp Zack Weinberg
17:13 perfered ELF debugging format for GNU tools David O'Brien
16:38 [RFA] rtl.texi (was Re: "OImode" ?) Phil Edwards
15:51 Testing 2.95.3 / 3.0 (was: Bernd Schmidt, release manager forGCC2.95.3) Gerald Pfeifer
15:40 Re: Kudos to the gcc developers Brad Lucier
14:44 Re: Kudos to the gcc developers Zack Weinberg
14:42 Successful build of CVS GCC under Cygwin! Kelley Cook
14:34 Re: GCC 2.95.2 Zack Weinberg
14:28 Re: Memory usage statistics Zack Weinberg
14:14 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 Kelley Cook
14:09 Re: "OImode" ? Branko Čibej
13:49 Re: Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi Joe Buck
13:48 Re: Do I have a bad version of gcc? Robert Boehne
13:29 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Joe Buck
13:27 Re: GCC 2.95.2 Erik Mouw
13:09 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Gabriel Dos Reis
12:53 Re: Do I have a bad version of gcc? Gerald Pfeifer
12:22 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Lee Iverson
12:21 Re: Do I have a bad version of gcc? Mike Stump
12:13 Re: Internal compiler error -- unrecognizable insn. Mike Stump
12:05 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Martin von Loewis
11:55 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Joe Buck
11:53 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 David Edelsohn
11:43 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer nbecker
11:37 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Gabriel Dos Reis
11:35 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Martin von Loewis
11:35 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Gabriel Dos Reis
11:34 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Martin von Loewis
11:16 Re: Why does this happen ?? Alexandre Oliva
11:15 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Joe Buck
11:03 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Franz Sirl
11:01 Memory usage statistics Brad Lucier
10:53 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Phil Edwards
10:50 Re: Why does this happen ?? Michael Meissner
10:47 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Bernd Schmidt
10:43 Re: Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi Richard Kenner
10:42 Re: Trying to build gcc for HP-UX 10.20 tprinceusa
10:38 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Martin von Loewis
10:26 RE: OON: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Jeremy Siek
10:13 Re: Why does this happen ?? Alexandre Oliva
09:37 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Bernd Schmidt
09:27 Re: g77? Joe Buck
09:27 Trying to build gcc for HP-UX 10.20 mcote
09:20 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Joe Buck
08:56 RE: OON: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Geoffrey Furnish
08:46 Kudos to the gcc developers Brad Lucier
08:43 g77? johnm
08:32 Re: Why does this happen ?? Davy Durham
08:07 Do I have a bad version of gcc? rlau
08:07 Re: Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi Richard Stallman
08:07 Re: Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi Richard Stallman
07:44 Re: libstdc++-v3 and pthread Joe Buck
07:34 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Alexandre Oliva
06:44 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Falk Hueffner
06:16 Internal compiler error -- unrecognizable insn. David Korn
06:01 GCC 2.95.2 c958179
05:56 Re: libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer Alexandre Oliva
05:37 libstc++-v3 vector not convertible to pointer nbecker
05:30 Re: gcc-2.95.2 hang with cpp Bernd Schmidt
05:17 Re: [Fwd: gcc-2.95.2 hang with cpp] Alexandre Oliva
04:21 HP/UX Daniel Lilienberg
03:39 Re: Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Bernd Schmidt
03:10 Re: README.apollo, README.FRESCO Gerald Pfeifer
02:33 Bernd Schmidt, release manager for GCC 2.95.3 Gerald Pfeifer
02:09 Re: libstdc++-v3 and pthread Franz Sirl
01:50 libstdc++-v3 and pthread Christian Iseli
01:38 libgcc1 error brahmaiah vallabhaneni
01:35 Re: sources in GCC repository Gerald Pfeifer
01:06 Re: Help for "gcc-2.8.1-sol7-sparc-local.gz" Gerald Pfeifer
00:51 sources in GCC repository McNulty Junior Bobby

November 29, 2000
22:24 Re: gcc-2.95.2 hang with cpp Zack Weinberg
22:02 Help for "gcc-2.8.1-sol7-sparc-local.gz" Ambarish Ranadive
21:39 Re: tips for configuring in the source directory? Benjamin Kosnik
18:30 Re: GCC 2.95.2 Windows NT Configure Batch File Tim Prince
16:43 Re: Feeding back fixincludes changes Bruce Korb
15:04 "OImode" ? Phil Edwards
15:03 Re: Feeding back fixincludes changes Joern Rennecke
14:53 Re: Feeding back fixincludes changes Richard Henderson
14:40 [Fwd: gcc-2.95.2 hang with cpp] Jean Mao
12:22 Re: Feeding back fixincludes changes Bruce Korb
11:37 Feeding back fixincludes changes Joseph S. Myers
10:56 Re: Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi Robert Dewar
09:53 Re: Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi Mark Mitchell
09:34 Re: Documentation Nick Burrett
09:21 Re: Documentation Richard Earnshaw
09:07 Re: Documentation Erik Mouw
08:54 Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi Joseph S. Myers
08:46 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 Erik Mouw
07:31 Re: README.apollo, README.FRESCO Florian Weimer
06:01 README.apollo, README.FRESCO Gerald Pfeifer
04:58 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
04:52 Re: GCC 2.95.2 Windows NT Configure Batch File James Buchanan
04:32 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 Alexandre Oliva
04:05 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 Gerald Pfeifer
03:41 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 c958179
02:57 Re: building splitted gcc manual (errors in md.texi) Richard Earnshaw
02:50 Documentation Rafael Rodríguez Velilla
02:41 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 Alexandre Oliva
02:31 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 c958179
02:09 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mark Mitchell
02:06 Re: Why does this happen ?? Andreas Jaeger
02:05 Re: Why does this happen ?? Alexandre Oliva
01:53 Why does this happen ?? Koundinya.K
00:06 Re: GCC 2.95.2 Windows NT Configure Batch File Andris Pavenis

November 28, 2000
20:31 gcc-ss-20001127 is now available law
20:03 Re: seg fault on redirection Jiann-Ming Su
19:21 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
18:42 Re: problems installing the gcc compiler Alexandre Oliva
18:37 Re: GCC 2.95.2 Windows NT Configure Batch File James Buchanan
18:14 Re: seg fault on redirection Joe Buck
17:46 Re: gcc-2.95.2 hang with cpp Zack Weinberg
17:29 gcc-2.95.2 hang with cpp Jean Mao
16:56 problems installing the gcc compiler arturo gaona
16:02 building splitted gcc manual (errors in md.texi) Matthias Klose
15:53 Re: tips for configuring in the source directory? Alexandre Oliva
15:19 operator overloading Peter J. Viitasaari
14:42 Re: g++ and stdout strangeness Falk Hueffner
14:06 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 Erik Mouw
13:06 Re: Installing egcs-1.1.2 Alexandre Oliva
13:00 Re: does c++filt work? Daniel Berlin
12:54 does c++filt work? nbecker
12:45 Cleaning up the FOM Joseph S. Myers
11:51 Re: Request to move config/rs6000 to config/powerpc David Edelsohn
11:35 Request to move config/rs6000 to config/powerpc David O'Brien
11:33 Installing egcs-1.1.2 c958179
11:29 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Philipp Thomas
11:04 Re: g++ and stdout strangeness Benjamin Kosnik
10:43 Re: c++/890 Joe Buck
10:38 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Joern Rennecke
10:20 Re: --enable-cstdio ? Mark Mitchell
10:16 Re: Configuring inside the source tree Mark Mitchell
10:15 Re: c++/890 Mark Mitchell
10:13 Re: GCC 2.95.2 Windows NT Configure Batch File Laurynas Biveinis
09:47 Re: GCC 2.95.2 Windows NT Configure Batch File Alexandre Oliva
09:23 g++ and stdout strangeness Christian Iseli
08:29 --enable-cstdio ? nbecker
07:58 g++ on empty file dumps core Christian Iseli
06:33 Re: c++/890 Travis Moulton
03:08 Configuring inside the source tree Nathan Sidwell
02:44 Re: c++/890 Nathan Sidwell
01:33 gcc Dump error or g++ IR error? Liu WS
01:04 LANGUAGES vs --enable-languages (was: Testsuite documentation) Gerald Pfeifer

November 27, 2000
23:39 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
21:49 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Joe Buck
20:18 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Jeffrey A Law
19:58 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Philipp Thomas
19:30 Re: Testsuite documentation Tim Prince
19:06 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Philipp Thomas
18:11 Re: Testsuite documentation Gerald Pfeifer
18:11 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Joern Rennecke
16:07 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mark Probst
15:46 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:37 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Jeffrey A Law
15:33 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mike Stump
15:27 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Geoff Keating
15:15 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:13 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Mike Stump
14:56 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Geoff Keating
14:42 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Harvey J. Stein
14:30 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Harvey J. Stein
14:29 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Jeffrey A Law
14:16 Re: Where is noskipws Phil Edwards
14:04 GCC 2.95.2 Windows NT Configure Batch File James Buchanan
13:51 Where is noskipws Davy Durham
13:02 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Travis Moulton
12:57 seg fault on redirection Jiann-Ming Su
12:46 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Harvey J. Stein
12:46 Re: Testsuite documentation Toon Moene
12:42 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Dennis Bjorklund
12:34 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:06 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Jeffrey A Law
11:44 Re: thoughts on a new switch, -print-flags ? Mark Mitchell
11:36 Re: thoughts on a new switch, -print-flags ? Phil Edwards
11:26 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Eric W. Biederman
11:21 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Lars Brinkhoff
10:54 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mark Mitchell
10:48 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mark Mitchell
10:47 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mark Mitchell
10:22 linker not linking..... Andrew Otwell
10:22 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mark Probst
10:09 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Michael Matz
10:04 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
09:48 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Jeffrey A Law
09:44 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Jeffrey A Law
09:39 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Geert Bosch
09:31 Re: COFF debugging info bug Laurynas Biveinis
09:24 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Jan Hubicka
09:14 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Bernd Schmidt
09:08 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
08:44 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
08:39 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Andi Kleen
08:38 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Bernd Schmidt
08:34 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Philipp Thomas
08:27 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Philipp Thomas
08:25 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Jeffrey A Law
08:07 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Andi Kleen
08:05 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization David Edelsohn
08:01 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Michael Meissner
07:58 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Jeffrey A Law
07:29 COFF debugging info bug Laurynas Biveinis
07:04 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Bernd Schmidt
06:59 Re: Testsuite documentation Michael Meissner
06:52 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Michael Meissner
05:44 Re: gcc Installation problem Alexandre Oliva
05:18 Re: download difficulties Gerald Pfeifer
05:11 download difficulties Stuebs-Prochaska, June
05:06 gcc Installation problem Sreekumar
04:49 Re: Small sibbling call tweak Jan Hubicka
03:54 m68k-coff illegal code generation patch Pantelis Antoniou

November 26, 2000
23:18 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Mike Stump
23:09 Re: NLS support will be disabled by default for now Dennis Bjorklund
23:06 Re: Testsuite documentation Mike Stump
22:14 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Alexandre Oliva
21:50 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Jeffrey A Law
19:54 NLS support will be disabled by default for now Philipp Thomas
19:20 Re: thoughts on a new switch, -print-flags ? Michael Meissner
18:09 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
18:08 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
17:56 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
17:40 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
16:21 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Joseph S. Myers
16:08 Re: DejaGnu Richard Stallman
15:46 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
15:39 Re: Testsuite documentation Tim Prince
15:27 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
14:04 Testsuite documentation Gerald Pfeifer
13:51 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
13:43 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
13:02 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Geoff Keating
12:04 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:55 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mark Probst
11:34 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Per Bothner
11:30 Re: Integrated preprocessor bug Neil Booth
11:05 Re: genattrab memory usage Laurynas Biveinis
10:59 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Timothy J. Wood
09:55 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Andi Kleen
09:21 Re: Integrated preprocessor bug Neil Booth
09:12 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Geert Bosch
08:21 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
08:20 Re: GNU Fortran90? Toon Moene
08:18 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Bernd Schmidt
08:18 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Richard Stallman
08:14 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
08:03 Integrated preprocessor bug Laurynas Biveinis
07:44 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
07:25 Re: libstdc++-v3 and newlib Gabriel Dos Reis
06:51 DejaGnu Gerald Pfeifer
06:19 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:22 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Mark Probst
05:00 Re: forcing tail/sibling call optimization Robert Dewar
03:56 forcing tail/sibling call optimization Fergus Henderson
03:54 Re: is _GNU_SOURCE defined by gcc ? Uncle George
03:24 Re: Small sibbling call tweak Fergus Henderson
02:37 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Mike Stump
02:17 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Mike Stump
01:44 Re: G++ test failures Mike Stump

November 25, 2000
17:02 Status of texinfo removal? Joseph S. Myers
15:38 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Mark Mitchell
15:28 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Geoff Keating
15:10 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Franz Sirl
13:02 Re: GNU Fortran90? Andrew Vaught
09:15 Re: swedish translation Philipp Thomas
08:33 ANSI and TRADITIONAL McNulty Junior Bobby
08:23 Re: libstdc++-v3 and newlib Gabriel Dos Reis
08:14 libstdc++-v3 and newlib Joel Sherrill
07:34 Bootstrap stage2 ICE of today's CVS Joerg Faschingbauer

November 24, 2000
22:24 Re: New ABI EH (was Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI) Richard Henderson
20:02 Re: From PERU Davide Libenzi
19:48 Re: Apache Problem Alexandre Oliva
19:47 Re: From PERU Alexandre Oliva
18:00 Apache Problem Edward Espinoza
16:47 Problem bootstrapping latest sources Richard Kenner
16:43 Re: New ABI EH (was Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI) Mark Mitchell
16:34 Re: From PERU Davide Libenzi
16:28 From PERU Edward Espinoza
12:27 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Phil Edwards
11:01 Re: Modes on CONST_INTs Joern Rennecke
10:57 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Robert Dewar
10:21 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) James Buchanan
10:14 Re: is _GNU_SOURCE defined by gcc ? Florian Weimer
10:06 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Richard Stallman
07:49 Re: New ABI EH (was Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI) Jason Merrill
07:36 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) James Buchanan
07:35 Re: is _GNU_SOURCE defined by gcc ? Levente Farkas
07:20 fn pointer problem in v3 rob.taylor
06:54 Re: is _GNU_SOURCE defined by gcc ? Florian Weimer
06:35 is _GNU_SOURCE defined by gcc ? Levente Farkas
04:01 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Marc Espie
03:04 Re: test results on linux/alpha Christian Iseli
02:57 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on linux/alpha Christian Iseli
02:24 Bernd Schmidt goes blanket write Gerald Pfeifer
02:06 Modes on CONST_INTs Bernd Schmidt
00:25 Partially implemented or broken C extension ? Dmitry A. Antipov

November 23, 2000
20:54 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Richard Stallman
20:54 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Richard Stallman
19:42 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Phil Edwards
19:37 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Phil Edwards
19:06 Re: thoughts on a new switch, -print-flags ? Phil Edwards
15:10 Re: cpplib: fix -Wtrigraphs double warnings Geoff Keating
13:36 Re: test results on linux/alpha Toon Moene
13:27 Re: test results on linux/alpha Richard Henderson
12:30 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) James Buchanan
11:52 Re: test results on linux/alpha Joseph S. Myers
11:46 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) JF Martinez
11:43 Re: Invalid shortcut in calculate_global_regs_live Richard Henderson
11:22 Re: [discuss] Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Jan Hubicka
11:21 Re: test results on linux/alpha Brad Lucier
11:08 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Linus Torvalds
10:49 Re: [patches] Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Jan Hubicka
10:45 Re: Invalid shortcut in calculate_global_regs_live Bernd Schmidt
10:18 Re: glibc 2.2 and GCC CVS on alpha Kaz Kylheku
10:15 Invalid shortcut in calculate_global_regs_live Bernd Schmidt
09:50 Re: glibc 2.2 and GCC CVS on alpha H . J . Lu
09:03 Re: cpplib: fix -Wtrigraphs double warnings Zack Weinberg
08:48 Re: cpplib: fix -Wtrigraphs double warnings Geoff Keating
08:44 glibc 2.2 and GCC CVS on alpha Christian Iseli
06:27 test results on linux/alpha Christian Iseli
05:24 Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Robert Dewar
02:28 Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Eric W. Biederman
02:26 Re: Does the old FSF CVS tree still exist? Bernd Schmidt
02:15 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on linux/alpha Christian Iseli
00:06 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Alexandre Oliva

November 22, 2000
23:57 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on linux/alpha Christian Iseli
23:53 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Bill Wendling
23:23 Re: Porting libstdc++-v3 to cygwin Benjamin Kosnik
23:16 Re: Porting libstdc++-v3 to cygwin Christopher Faylor
22:42 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Zack Weinberg
22:09 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Zack Weinberg
21:27 Porting libstdc++-v3 to cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
18:54 Re: [discuss] Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Robert Dewar
18:20 Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Richard Henderson
18:14 Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Robert Dewar
18:14 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Alexandre Oliva
16:57 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Joe Buck
16:23 Re: GCC Build trouble Gerald Pfeifer
15:59 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Zack Weinberg
15:42 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Jeffrey A Law
15:36 Re: thoughts on a new switch, -print-flags ? Neil Booth
15:20 Re: V3 Porting Guide Mark Mitchell
15:19 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Zack Weinberg
15:19 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Zack Weinberg
15:17 thoughts on a new switch, -print-flags ? Phil Edwards
15:06 Re: V3 Porting Guide Phil Edwards
14:51 libio tests? David Ronis
14:29 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Bill Wendling
14:20 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Joe Buck
14:07 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Richard Kenner
14:02 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Joern Rennecke
13:57 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Richard Kenner
13:55 Re: 2.95.3 (was Re: Removal of V2 code) Tom Tromey
13:38 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Geoff Keating
13:23 SHARC Stuart Allman
13:19 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Dave Brolley
12:43 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Richard Kenner
12:43 Re: G++ test failures Benjamin Kosnik
12:31 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Jakub Jelinek
12:29 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Zack Weinberg
12:27 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Zack Weinberg
12:17 Bootstrap w/Redhat 7.0? Lee Iverson
12:14 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Joern Rennecke
12:02 Re: G++ test failures Mark Mitchell
11:53 Re: Does the old FSF CVS tree still exist? Richard Kenner
11:51 Re: G++ test failures Benjamin Kosnik
11:34 Re: Does the old FSF CVS tree still exist? Gerald Pfeifer
11:11 Re: Does the old FSF CVS tree still exist? law
11:08 Re: V3 Porting Guide law
11:07 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) David Edelsohn
11:06 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on linux/alpha Richard Henderson
11:03 Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Richard Henderson
10:58 G++ test failures Mark Mitchell
10:43 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Neil Booth
10:37 Does the old FSF CVS tree still exist? Bernd Schmidt
09:59 Re: download PRO*C Alexandre Oliva
09:56 Re: Better choice for UltraSPARC ... Alexandre Oliva
09:54 Re: Machine Description for Freedom CPU Alexandre Oliva
09:45 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Per Bothner
09:11 Re: V3 Porting Guide Mark Mitchell
08:35 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Joe Buck
07:12 Re: V3 Porting Guide law
06:55 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Robert Dewar
06:15 Re: [discuss] Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Robert Dewar
05:31 Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Robert Dewar
05:25 Re: SC confidentiality Richard Kenner
05:17 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Richard Stallman
05:17 Recent change breaks all versions of Emacs Richard Stallman
04:30 Re: duplicate symbols on HP-PA Marco Franzen
04:26 Bootstrap comparison failure on linux/alpha Christian Iseli
03:58 GCC is slooooow Werner Schweer
03:35 backtracking yacc Tim Josling
02:32 swedish translation Dennis Bjorklund
02:30 Re: CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
01:44 download PRO*C Balbeer Bhurjhee
01:09 CC register for x86-64 asm statements. Was: glibc: syscalls for x86-64 Jan Hubicka

November 21, 2000
22:23 Better choice for UltraSPARC ... Davide Libenzi
21:57 Re: SC confidentiality Mark Mitchell
21:41 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
20:38 LAPACK 3.0 with g77 from 20001120 snapshot on Irix6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
20:00 SC confidentiality Geoff Keating
17:21 2.95.3 (was Re: Removal of V2 code) Joe Buck
16:31 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Joe Buck
16:08 Re: Removal of V2 code Tom Tromey
16:00 Trivia... Zack Weinberg
15:38 Re: genattrab memory usage Mark E.
15:35 Re: V3 Porting Guide law
15:32 Re: genattrab memory usage Richard Henderson
15:06 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
15:05 V3 Porting Guide Mark Mitchell
14:14 Re: Removal of V2 code Geoff Keating
12:47 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
12:45 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
12:37 Re: Removal of V2 code Geoff Keating
12:35 Machine Description for Freedom CPU Lee Randolph Salzman
12:24 Re: Results for 2.97 20001120 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 with -mcpu=ultrasparc -m64 Jakub Jelinek
12:20 Re: Removal of V2 code Benjamin Kosnik
12:19 Re: genattrab memory usage Laurynas Biveinis
12:11 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris H . J . Lu
11:36 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris Joe Buck
11:26 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris Alexandre Oliva
11:21 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris Ovidiu Predescu
11:21 Re: [Mingw-users] Possible strange behaviour of gcc Earnie Boyd
11:20 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris Alexandre Oliva
11:08 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris H . J . Lu
10:59 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris Joe Buck
10:56 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
10:55 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris H . J . Lu
10:51 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris Joe Buck
10:44 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris H . J . Lu
10:40 Re: Results for 2.97 20001120 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 with -mcpu=ultrasparc -m64 Richard Henderson
10:35 Re: genattrab memory usage Mark E.
10:31 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris Joe Buck
10:19 Results for 2.97 20001120 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 with -mcpu=ultrasparc -m64 Brad Lucier
10:06 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P for big endian Joern Rennecke
09:57 Re: Java support in GCC 3.0 Mark Mitchell
09:39 Re: latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris H . J . Lu
09:27 latest snapshot fails to build libobjc.so on Solaris Joe Buck
09:03 Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Zack Weinberg
08:36 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Alexandre Oliva
08:29 Re: call from Moscow Christopher Faylor
08:28 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Gavin Romig-Koch
08:06 Mistaken change in GCC (fwd) Gerald Pfeifer
07:30 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Jason Merrill
07:26 Re: Removal of V2 code Daniel Berlin
06:55 Possible strange behaviour of gcc Martin Kahlert
06:38 Re: Removal of V2 code Franz Sirl
06:21 Re: GCC for Windows, Bison compiler Tim Prince
05:51 Re: Who can send me some documents about THREAD? Armand Liberi
05:45 Re: Who can send me some documents about THREAD? Armand Liberi
05:32 Who can send me some documents about THREAD? Edward
05:31 GCC for Windows, Bison compiler Vladimir Rykov, PhD in Computa
04:14 GCC for Windows, Bison compiler Vladimir Rykov, PhD in Computa
04:09 GCC for Windows, Bison compiler Vladimir Rykov, PhD in Computa
03:28 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Alexandre Oliva
03:11 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Andreas Schwab
02:35 Extra constraints and (symbolic) immediates Jan Hubicka
01:11 call from Moscow Vladimir Rykov

November 20, 2000
22:24 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Alexandre Oliva
22:20 Re: Building CVS on IRIX without -mabi=64 Alexandre Oliva
22:00 M68K assembly FRCastro
21:40 Re: Java support in GCC 3.0 per
21:20 backtracking yacc Anthony J Heading
21:15 Re: Java support in GCC 3.0 Joe Keane
21:07 Re: -Wswitch vs -Wuninitialized Richard Henderson
19:31 Re: gcc-ss-20001101 is now available law
18:31 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Zack Weinberg
17:59 Re: sun/os as release candidate was: Removal of V2 code Gerald Pfeifer
17:54 Re: memory allocation problem Joe Buck
17:04 Re: Recursive make harmful (was: Re: what should bootstrap *really* do?) DJ Delorie
16:56 gcc-ss-20001120 is now available law
16:46 Build system benchmark Scott A Crosby
16:39 Recursive make harmful (was: Re: what should bootstrap *really* do?) Scott A Crosby
16:36 memory allocation problem Jiann-Ming Su
16:27 Trivial case of inefficial PA code Richard Kenner
16:19 Re: -Wswitch vs -Wuninitialized Andrew Cagney
15:01 Re: New ABI EH (was Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI) Mark Mitchell
14:59 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
14:58 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
14:58 Re: Somewhat-related changes to expr.c & tree.c Geert Bosch
14:32 Building CVS on IRIX without -mabi=64 Albert Chin-A-Young
14:26 Re: New ABI EH (was Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI) Jim Wilson
14:11 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Mike Stump
13:54 Re: Removal of V2 code Richard Kenner
13:41 Re: sun/os as release candidate was: Removal of V2 code Zack Weinberg
13:02 Re: genattrab memory usage Zack Weinberg
12:53 Re: sun/os as release candidate was: Removal of V2 code Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:28 Re: genattrab memory usage Richard Henderson
11:24 Re: -Wswitch vs -Wuninitialized Richard Henderson
11:11 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
10:53 Re: New ABI EH (was Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI) Mark Mitchell
09:47 Re: Removal of V2 code law
09:46 sun/os as release candidate was: Removal of V2 code Robert Lipe
08:55 Re: Removal of V2 code Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:49 Re: Removal of V2 code Richard Kenner
08:34 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
08:01 genattrab memory usage Laurynas Biveinis
07:06 New ABI EH (was Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI) Jason Merrill
05:53 Re: Removal of V2 code Joseph S. Myers
03:32 Re: Removal of V2 code Marc Espie
02:54 Re: Removal of V2 code Franz Sirl
02:34 Re: Copyright forms (was: Automated testing framework) Richard Stallman
02:24 Re: -Wswitch vs -Wuninitialized Bo Thorsen
02:11 Re: Removal of V2 code Geoff Keating
01:07 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
00:55 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
00:41 Re: Removal of V2 code Andrew Cagney
00:41 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Andrew Cagney

November 19, 2000
23:48 Re: Lines Overflowing My Screen Andris Pavenis
22:33 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
22:12 Re: Removal of V2 code Geoff Keating
22:07 test result Chai Mee Joon
21:52 alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu (compile sucess) Chai Mee Joon
21:52 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
21:20 binutils 2.10.1.0.2 is released. H . J . Lu
20:47 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Alexandre Oliva
20:38 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Mark Mitchell
20:32 Re: user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile law
20:24 Re: Removal of V2 code Geoff Keating
20:16 -Wswitch vs -Wuninitialized Andrew Cagney
19:30 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Alexandre Oliva
19:22 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Mark Mitchell
18:34 Re: C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Andrew Cagney
17:56 Re: Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
17:40 RE: Removal of V2 code Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
17:24 Re: Removal of V2 code Christopher Faylor
17:10 Re: Removal of V2 code Geoff Keating
16:53 Re: libstdc++ web pages: sources.redhat.com -> gcc.gnu.org Christopher Faylor
15:55 adding documentation for --enable-languages Matthias Klose
14:48 user hostile gobbledygook in top level Makefile Zack Weinberg
14:43 Re: libstdc++ web pages: sources.redhat.com -> gcc.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer
14:28 Re: libstdc++ web pages: sources.redhat.com -> gcc.gnu.org Joseph S. Myers
14:14 Re: libstdc++ web pages: sources.redhat.com -> gcc.gnu.org Phil Edwards
13:16 libstdc++ web pages: sources.redhat.com -> gcc.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer
13:03 Removal of V2 code Mark Mitchell
11:12 Re: cpplib: Language defaults Zack Weinberg
06:18 Copyright forms (was: Automated testing framework) Gerald Pfeifer
03:57 Re: New pod2man released Joseph S. Myers

November 18, 2000
22:26 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Robert Dewar
22:25 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Robert Dewar
22:08 New pod2man released Russ Allbery
21:17 C++ PATCH: Switch to the new ABI Mark Mitchell
15:50 Re: cpplib: Language defaults Neil Booth
15:33 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Neil Booth
14:49 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Joe Buck
14:40 Java support in GCC 3.0 Mark Mitchell
14:33 Re: TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED, assemble_name, memory wastage Zack Weinberg
14:06 Re: TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED, assemble_name, memory wastage Mark Mitchell
14:02 Re: libio build bitching about bits/libc-lock.h Mark Mitchell
12:23 Re: cpplib: Language defaults Joseph S. Myers
12:14 Re: cpplib: Language defaults Zack Weinberg
11:45 cpplib: Language defaults Neil Booth
10:44 Re: proposed bootstrap changes DJ Delorie
10:32 CVS won't compile on HP-UX Albert Chin-A-Young
09:15 Re: TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED, assemble_name, memory wastage Richard Henderson
07:36 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Toon Moene
05:34 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Robert Dewar
05:09 PATCH for Re: Should people need bison or is that a bug? Gerald Pfeifer
05:07 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Gabriel Dos_Reis
04:53 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Gerald Pfeifer
04:47 Re: proposed bootstrap changes Alexandre Oliva
04:42 Re: GCC Build trouble Alexandre Oliva
04:39 Re: C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Gabriel Dos_Reis
04:38 Re: Order of .o-files and .a-files Alexandre Oliva
04:17 C++, libstdc++-v3 and, well, error messages Gerald Pfeifer

November 17, 2000
22:19 TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED, assemble_name, memory wastage Zack Weinberg
21:25 about install the gcc 2.95 tar gzip file ckm3
21:13 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Zack Weinberg
16:47 IRIX inet_ntoa() redux... Marc W. Mengel
16:47 Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists Gerald Pfeifer
15:12 Re: Questions about the CVS build process Gerald Pfeifer
13:38 GCC Build trouble Ronald Wikander
13:22 Re: libio build bitching about bits/libc-lock.h David Edelsohn
13:20 Lines Overflowing My Screen fburns
13:03 libio build bitching about bits/libc-lock.h Toon Moene
10:57 Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists Benjamin Kosnik
09:28 Re: proposed bootstrap changes DJ Delorie
09:23 Re: duplicate symbols on HP-PA John David Anglin
09:15 RE: rs6000.c / PPc-EABI / VxWorks / varargs / 2.95.2 vs. 2.7.2 David Korn
09:09 Re: i386 non-matching patterns Joern Rennecke
08:48 Re: duplicate symbols on HP-PA Marco Franzen
08:25 Re: rs6000.c / PPc-EABI / VxWorks / varargs / 2.95.2 vs. 2.7.2 David Edelsohn
06:54 Strange behavior of compiler optimization. Brian Makin
05:07 RE: Using of parse tree externally Dupont, Michael
03:09 Re: proposed bootstrap changes Richard Kenner
02:54 Order of .o-files and .a-files Henrik Nilsson
01:45 report: compile sucess Chai Mee Joon

November 16, 2000
22:20 Re: rs6000.c / PPc-EABI / VxWorks / varargs / 2.95.2 vs. 2.7.2 Mike Stump
21:18 Successful --enable-checking=misc,tree,rtl,gc,gcac bootstrap on irix6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
20:40 Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists Gabriel Dos Reis
20:29 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Eric W. Biederman
20:28 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Eric W. Biederman
19:10 Re: proposed bootstrap changes DJ Delorie
19:00 Re: proposed bootstrap changes Richard Kenner
18:57 Re: proposed bootstrap changes DJ Delorie
18:55 Re: proposed bootstrap changes Richard Kenner
18:40 i386 non-matching patterns Torbjorn Granlund
17:48 Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists Phil Edwards
17:09 Re: proposed bootstrap changes DJ Delorie
16:42 Re: compiling libio under glibc-2.2 Joe Buck
16:30 Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists Joe Buck
16:27 Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists Mark Mitchell
15:52 Moving the libstdc++ lists Gerald Pfeifer
15:51 Re: duplicate symbols on HP-PA law
15:26 Re: Question about gcc and ctrl-m Neil Booth
14:47 Question about gcc and ctrl-m Balzli, Robert
14:36 Re: proposed bootstrap changes Richard Kenner
14:30 Re: proposed bootstrap changes DJ Delorie
14:25 Re: MEM flags and stack temps Richard Kenner
14:25 Re: proposed bootstrap changes Richard Kenner
14:24 Re: MEM flags and stack temps Joe Buck
14:04 Re: MEM flags and stack temps Richard Kenner
14:01 compiling libio under glibc-2.2 Jeff Sparkes
14:01 Re: MEM flags and stack temps Joe Buck
13:47 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Geoff Keating
13:35 ia64 patch for mask bit confusion Jim Wilson
13:29 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Toon Moene
13:25 Re: Compiling gcc-2.95.2 Alexandre Oliva
13:05 Re: Compiling gcc-2.95.2 Amos Leffler
13:01 proposed bootstrap changes DJ Delorie
12:24 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Richard Stallman
12:10 ia64 patch for C++ gprel link errors Jim Wilson
11:40 Re: Re: GNU Fortran 90? tprinceusa
10:58 Re: Compiling gcc-2.95.2 Alexandre Oliva
10:53 Compiling gcc-2.95.2 Amos Leffler
10:41 Re: duplicate symbols on HP-PA John David Anglin
10:25 success Italo Antonio
07:12 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic William C. Cox
03:27 Re: MEM flags and stack temps Richard Kenner
03:25 Re: MEM flags and stack temps Jan Hubicka
03:09 Re: zack's todo list Florian Weimer
02:33 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Bernd Schmidt
00:01 Re: Gcc and message catalogs Dennis Bjorklund

November 15, 2000
22:55 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Zack Weinberg
22:25 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Mike Stump
18:55 Re: Questions about the CVS build process Tom Tromey
18:25 Re: zack's todo list Mike Stump
18:23 Re: Questions about the CVS build process Tkil
17:00 Re: MEM flags and stack temps Joe Buck
16:27 Re: gcc-ss-20001113 is now available Jason Molenda
15:42 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Zack Weinberg
15:15 Re: gcc-ss-20001113 is now available Tim Josling
15:15 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic David Starner
15:15 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Bill Wendling
15:01 Re: gcc-ss-20001113 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
14:28 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Stan Shebs
14:23 Re: GNU Fortran 90? jfm2
14:11 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
13:55 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Torbjorn Granlund
13:49 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Mark Mitchell
13:29 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Geoff Keating
13:23 Re: gcc-ss-20001113 is now available Geoff Keating
13:22 Re: GNU Fortran 90? David Edelsohn
13:01 Re: Autotools Benjamin Kosnik
12:51 Re: Autotools Phil Edwards
12:41 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Mark Mitchell
12:40 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Toon Moene
12:40 Re: Autotools Mark Mitchell
12:32 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Jim Wilson
12:30 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Joern Rennecke
12:30 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Richard Henderson
12:25 Re: Autotools Benjamin Kosnik
12:24 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Richard Henderson
11:58 gcc-2.95.2 HP-UX 11.00 Dynamically Linked Binary LINTNER, MITCHELL (SBCSI)
11:53 Re: gcc-ss-20001113 is now available Tim Josling
11:08 Re: Questions about the CVS build process Philip Blundell
10:16 Porting Toshiba TLCS-900 - Help GSL
09:35 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Joern Rennecke
09:20 Re: Questions about the CVS build process Joern Rennecke
09:11 Re: Questions about the CVS build process Tom Tromey
08:55 Re: mmap versus read benchmark Bourne-again Superuser
08:47 RE: rs6000.c / PPc-EABI / VxWorks / varargs / 2.95.2 vs. 2.7.2 David Korn
08:47 Re: MEM flags and stack temps Mark Mitchell
08:37 Re: MEM flags and stack temps law
08:15 Re: rs6000.c / PPc-EABI / VxWorks / varargs / 2.95.2 vs. 2.7.2 David Edelsohn
07:23 rs6000.c / PPc-EABI / VxWorks / varargs / 2.95.2 vs. 2.7.2 gcc-return-22456-listarch-gcc=
06:31 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:59 MEM flags and stack temps Richard Kenner
05:11 Re: zack's todo list Florian Weimer
04:38 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Richard Stallman
03:57 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Earnshaw
03:11 Re: zack's todo list Zack Weinberg
02:22 Re: Gcc and message catalogs Philipp Thomas
01:54 Re: zack's todo list Florian Weimer
01:01 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Zack Weinberg
00:56 Re: How to list all calls a library contained? Eric Christopher
00:56 Re: How to list all calls a library contained? Gerald Pfeifer
00:49 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Michael Meissner
00:23 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Zack Weinberg
00:21 How to list all calls a library contained? Yiyan Yang
00:21 Re: zack's todo list Zack Weinberg
00:00 Re: zack's todo list Joseph S. Myers

November 14, 2000
23:43 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Neil Booth
23:04 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Zack Weinberg
23:03 Re: Where can I find a list of gcc option? Eric Christopher
23:01 Re: zack's todo list Zack Weinberg
22:53 Where can I find a list of gcc option? Yiyan Yang
22:41 Re: zack's todo list Zack Weinberg
22:41 Re: Questions about the CVS build process Eric Christopher
21:53 Questions about the CVS build process Tkil
20:03 mmap versus read benchmark Zack Weinberg
18:22 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Stan Shebs
17:59 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Mike Stump
17:19 Re: named return value extension Mike Stump
16:47 Re: libstdc++ v3 & snapshots Benjamin Scherrey
16:33 Re: libstdc++ v3 & snapshots Benjamin Scherrey
15:09 Re: var-args implementation Richard Henderson
14:36 Re: GNU Fortran 90? Toon Moene
14:28 Re: 2.95.2 arm-elf-gcc and -msingle-pic-base Philip Blundell
14:08 Re: make failure in building GCC CVS Gerald Pfeifer
14:03 Re: libstdc++ without g++ - alas ... Phil Edwards
14:01 GNU Fortran 90? Stan Shebs
13:51 libstdc++ without g++ - alas ... Toon Moene
13:42 2.95.2 arm-elf-gcc and -msingle-pic-base Dan Hovang
12:14 Re: libstdc++ v3 & snapshots Mike Stump
12:02 libstdc++ v3 & snapshots Benjamin Scherrey
12:01 Re: Gcc and message catalogs Dennis Bjorklund
11:59 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Mike Stump
11:46 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Kenner
11:13 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Joseph S. Myers
11:04 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Geert Bosch
10:58 make failure in building GCC CVS David Starner
10:55 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Kenner
10:46 Re: Gcc and message catalogs Philipp Thomas
10:41 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
10:38 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Kenner
10:37 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
10:31 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:30 named return value extension Carlo Wood
10:20 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Kenner
10:20 Re: Gcc and message catalogs Geoff Keating
10:16 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
10:10 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Earnshaw
10:07 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Joern Rennecke
10:02 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Hans-Peter Nilsson
09:54 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
09:46 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? DJ Delorie
09:27 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Hans-Peter Nilsson
09:17 compiling 2.95(.2) Gunther Nikl
08:45 Re: zack's todo list law
08:42 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
08:41 Re: duplicate symbols on HP-PA law
08:35 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? DJ Delorie
08:30 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Kenner
08:28 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) law
08:14 Re: i18n, try 2 Philipp Thomas
08:11 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Hans-Peter Nilsson
07:18 Bug in setjmp/longjmp on Sparc Richard Kenner
07:02 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? DJ Delorie
07:01 Gcc and message catalogs Philipp Thomas
07:00 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? DJ Delorie
05:23 Fwd: Re: [Mingw-users] -fnative-struct Earnie Boyd
05:22 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
04:44 GDB 5? Andrew Cagney
03:49 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Joern Rennecke
03:30 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Kenner
03:26 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Kenner
03:06 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Richard Kenner
03:02 Re: var-args implementation Franz Sirl
02:29 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
02:01 i18n, try 2 Dennis Bjorklund
00:41 var-args implementation HPENNER

November 13, 2000
23:30 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Neil Booth
23:22 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Richard Stallman
23:21 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Stallman
21:22 Re: aix, dlopen(NULL, .), and gcc Scott Dudley
21:07 RE: Template help,To Alexandre Oliva Shiv Shankar Ramakrishnan
20:56 RE: what should bootstrap *really* do? Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
20:54 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
20:52 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
20:37 Re: Template help,To Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva
20:29 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? DJ Delorie
20:26 Re: what should bootstrap *really* do? Alexandre Oliva
20:14 Re: Pretty please with sugar on the top Alexandre Oliva
20:05 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
20:04 Re: gcc installation Alexandre Oliva
20:01 Re: aix, dlopen(NULL, .), and gcc David Edelsohn
20:00 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
19:55 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
19:54 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Zack Weinberg
19:51 Re: [Fwd: aix, dlopen(NULL, .), and gcc] Alexandre Oliva
19:41 RE: Template help,To Alexandre Oliva Shiv Shankar Ramakrishnan
19:37 Re: Problems Building gcc-2.95 David Edelsohn
19:23 what should bootstrap *really* do? DJ Delorie
19:05 [Fwd: aix, dlopen(NULL, .), and gcc] Scott Dudley
18:48 Re: iostream.h compile error Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
17:55 iostream.h compile error Liu WS
17:45 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Branko Čibej
17:01 gcc-ss-20001113 is now available law
16:37 Re: C++ include files ``gone''? Michael Poole
16:29 Re: C++ include files ``gone''? Phil Edwards
16:24 Re: C++ include files ``gone''? Michael Poole
16:15 Re: Preprocessor arithmetic Richard Henderson
15:59 Problems Building gcc-2.95 Aaron Gerber
15:41 Preprocessor arithmetic Neil Booth
15:28 Re: C++ include files ``gone''? Gerald Pfeifer
15:06 Re: Pretty please with sugar on the top Joe Buck
13:59 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Raja R Harinath
13:54 Re: Pretty please with sugar on the top Ross Smith
13:15 Re: zack's todo list Mark Mitchell
12:58 Pretty please with sugar on the top Alexander Haväng
12:31 Re: zack's todo list Neil Booth
12:27 Re: Inefficient code generation with -fPIC. Joe Buck
12:26 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Rod Stewart
12:10 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Kenner
12:09 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Richard Kenner
12:06 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
11:48 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Joe Buck
11:46 Re: GCC 3.0 release criteria suggestion. Call for cc0 buildhosts (like m68k and VAX). Mark Mitchell
11:44 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Earnshaw
11:26 GCC 3.0 release criteria suggestion. Call for cc0 build hosts (like m68k and VAX). Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:21 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
11:11 Re: zack's todo list Joseph S. Myers
11:01 Re: i18n Dennis Bjorklund
10:57 Re: Inefficient code generation with -fPIC. suckfish
10:23 Re: zack's todo list Mark Mitchell
10:19 Re: C++ include files ``gone''? Mark Mitchell
09:56 zack's todo list Zack Weinberg
09:49 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Russ Allbery
09:46 Re: Solaris, another case of ``missing'' files Phil Edwards
09:43 Re: C++ include files ``gone''? Phil Edwards
09:40 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Zack Weinberg
09:36 Re: Inefficient code generation with -fPIC. Joe Buck
09:35 Re: PATCH: Switch to V3 law
09:24 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Russ Allbery
09:22 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Raja R Harinath
09:21 Re: i18n Dennis Bjorklund
09:10 Re: i18n Andreas Jaeger
09:03 i18n Dennis Bjorklund
08:33 Re: C++ include files ``gone''? Gabriel Dos Reis
07:57 Solaris, another case of ``missing'' files Gerald Pfeifer
07:31 C++ include files ``gone''? Gerald Pfeifer
04:34 gcc installation michal
03:53 pthreads define on Solaris RDBrown
03:27 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Kenner
03:22 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Earnshaw
03:10 Re: Question Gerald Pfeifer
02:54 Question Marzuq Madi
02:36 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Kenner
01:25 Re: Inefficient code generation with -fPIC. suckfish

November 12, 2000
21:57 new entry for GCC CVS build Chai Mee Joon
21:35 Re: gcc behavior re const optimization Andrew Morton
20:40 Re: Template help,To Alexandre Oliva Liu WS
19:26 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
19:16 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Kenner
18:48 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
18:38 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Kenner
18:04 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
17:52 Re: Makefile change to restart bootstraps Mark Mitchell
17:43 Makefile change to restart bootstraps Richard Kenner
17:30 Re: PATCH: Switch to V3 Mark Mitchell
17:22 PATCH: Switch to V3 Mark Mitchell
16:20 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Zack Weinberg
16:02 Re: Analysis of remaining EGCS references 2 Gerald Pfeifer
15:44 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Joseph S. Myers
15:34 Re: Analysis of remaining EGCS references 2 Joseph S. Myers
15:14 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Zack Weinberg
15:05 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Joseph S. Myers
14:56 Re: Analysis of remaining EGCS references 2 Gerald Pfeifer
14:52 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Zack Weinberg
13:05 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Alexandre Oliva
12:59 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Laurent Guerby
12:58 Inefficient code generation with -fPIC. suckfish
12:49 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Alexandre Oliva
12:47 Re: need assistance Alexandre Oliva
12:42 Re: Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Alexandre Oliva
12:14 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Andreas Jaeger
10:50 Automated testing framework (was: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze) Laurent Guerby
10:15 Re: [discuss] AMD x86-64 GCC development Jan Hubicka
09:57 Re: [discuss] AMD x86-64 GCC development Richard Kenner
09:51 Re: [discuss] AMD x86-64 GCC development Jan Hubicka
09:44 Re: [discuss] AMD x86-64 GCC development Jan Hubicka
08:19 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Lipe
07:37 need assistance mfalan1
06:18 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
06:00 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Richard Kenner
05:36 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
05:32 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Joseph S. Myers
05:29 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
05:18 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Alexandre Oliva
05:16 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
05:11 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
05:06 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
05:03 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Mark Mitchell
05:01 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
04:59 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Alexandre Oliva
04:55 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
04:50 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Alexandre Oliva
04:50 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Mark Mitchell
04:42 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Robert Dewar
04:34 V3: Tree slushy Mark Mitchell
04:24 Re: code gen logic for virtual members when optimizing? Alexandre Oliva
02:57 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Mark Mitchell
02:46 Re: V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Andreas Jaeger
02:31 V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze Mark Mitchell
01:01 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Stallman

November 11, 2000
23:57 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Zack Weinberg
20:35 Switching to V3 Mark Mitchell
20:12 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Russ Allbery
17:53 V3 and IRIX 6.5 Mark Mitchell
16:44 code gen logic for virtual members when optimizing? Marat Boshernitsan
15:40 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Joseph S. Myers
15:29 RE: Switching to V3 Mark Mitchell
15:22 RE: Switching to V3 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
15:07 Switching to V3 Mark Mitchell
15:01 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Joseph S. Myers
14:18 Re: "high" priority PRs Mark Mitchell
14:06 "high" priority PRs Phil Edwards
13:50 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Zack Weinberg
12:15 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Mark Mitchell
11:14 Installation names Joseph S. Myers
10:11 Analysis of remaining EGCS references 2 Joseph S. Myers
07:37 Re: Template help,To Alexandre Oliva Robert Dewar
01:32 Re: Template help,To Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva
01:27 Re: Template help,To Alexandre Oliva Liu WS
01:11 Re: Template help Alexandre Oliva
01:08 Template help Liu WS

November 10, 2000
23:32 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Russ Allbery
17:36 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Eric Christopher
17:32 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? David Edelsohn
17:27 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Gerald Pfeifer
17:11 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Zack Weinberg
17:10 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Mike Stump
16:55 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Eric Christopher
16:52 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Joe Buck
16:44 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Phil Edwards
16:37 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Eric Christopher
16:24 Re: Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Phil Edwards
16:12 PATCH for Re: gcc 2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 Gerald Pfeifer
16:09 Solaris build failure because of wchar_t handling? Joe Buck
14:38 Re: Head up: libstdc++ web pages Gerald Pfeifer
14:34 gcc ver 2.6? Anderjaska, John
13:42 Re: Will there be a new interims gcc-2.95.2+x release ? Joe Buck
13:21 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Gerald Pfeifer
12:47 Testsuites done the Right Way :-) Toon Moene
11:58 Re: gcc behavior re const optimization Joe Buck
11:51 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Joe Buck
11:30 Will there be a new interims gcc-2.95.2+x release ? Michael Meding
11:16 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Alexandre Oliva
11:14 Re: What does this error-message mean? Alexandre Oliva
11:10 Re: make install Alexandre Oliva
11:06 gcc behavior re const optimization Vincent Penquerc'h
11:06 Re: list of gcc files/purpose? brent verner
11:04 Re: HP-PA ABI issues - framepointer handling John David Anglin
11:01 Re: -O2 on alphaev6 has big problems Brad Lucier
10:51 Re: -O2 on alphaev6 has big problems Geoff Keating
10:17 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names law
10:12 Re: HP-PA ABI issues - framepointer handling law
10:06 Re: gcc 2.95.2 -fPIC on HP-UX 11-> ld: Data Linkage Table (+z) overf low in file [...] - use +Z option to recompile law
09:53 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Gerald Pfeifer
09:41 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Joseph S. Myers
09:30 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names law
09:28 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Gerald Pfeifer
09:16 Re: Generation process for cpp.1 Zack Weinberg
08:42 Generation process for cpp.1 Joseph S. Myers
08:39 -O2 on alphaev6 has big problems Brad Lucier
07:53 What does this error-message mean? Arne Sorli
07:13 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Richard Earnshaw
07:09 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names law
06:49 RE: gcc 2.95.2 HP-UX 10.20 Robert Dewar
06:16 RE: gcc 2.95.2 HP-UX 10.20 David Korn
05:07 gcc 2.95.2 HP-UX 10.20 Ehrke, Christian
00:50 global offset table problem Ben Hubbert

November 09, 2000
21:48 Re: list of gcc files/purpose? sidster
20:04 Re: list of gcc files/purpose? brent verner
19:58 make install reedkotler
19:28 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Nix
18:45 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Gerald Pfeifer
17:47 list of gcc files/purpose? Gary Funck
17:29 Re: Head up: libstdc++ web pages Gerald Pfeifer
12:36 Re: AMD x86-64 GCC development Mark Mitchell
12:19 Re: [discuss] AMD x86-64 GCC development Andreas Jaeger
12:03 Re: [discuss] AMD x86-64 GCC development Richard Kenner
11:51 Re: [discuss] AMD x86-64 GCC development Andreas Jaeger
11:40 Re: AMD x86-64 GCC development law
11:29 AMD x86-64 GCC development Richard Kenner
09:43 Building CVS under HP-UX 11.00 Albert Chin-A-Young
07:31 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Mike Stump
06:09 Re: shared libg2c? Marc Espie
05:50 Re: gcc 2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 Alexandre Oliva
05:27 gcc 2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 radek_sedmak
03:08 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Richard Kenner
03:04 Re: bug report sidster
02:50 Re: README.gnat (was: Patch to remove more EGCS references) Richard Kenner
01:08 bug report zuchman
00:12 Re: more on the C++ abstraction penalty Mark Mitchell

November 08, 2000
21:49 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Joe Buck
21:28 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Ben Elliston
19:13 Re: more on the C++ abstraction penalty Mark Mitchell
19:03 Re: more on the C++ abstraction penalty Joe Buck
17:46 Re: When I compile c++ files,which preprocessor be used?tradcpp,or cpp? Alexandre Oliva
17:43 When I compile c++ files,which preprocessor be used?tradcpp,or cpp? Liu WS
17:21 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P for big endian Joern Rennecke
15:36 A sick idea - mmapped file output Neil Booth
15:34 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Neil Booth
13:56 Re: function pointer Joern Rennecke
12:40 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Mark Mitchell
12:18 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Tom Tromey
11:28 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Jamie Lokier
10:17 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Geoff Keating
10:07 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Michael Meissner
09:35 Re: Head up: libstdc++ web pages Mark Mitchell
09:29 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Zack Weinberg
08:39 Re: more on the C++ abstraction penalty Jeffrey A Law
06:02 Re: size of int 24 brahmaiah vallabhaneni
05:31 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Jamie Lokier
03:42 gcc align. RenWei
03:02 Re: function pointer Robert Dewar
03:02 Re: README.gnat (was: Patch to remove more EGCS references) Gerald Pfeifer
02:41 Head up: libstdc++ web pages Gerald Pfeifer
01:30 RE:gcc behavior re optimization Benedetto Proietti
01:25 Re: function pointer Fu-hau Hsu
01:04 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Gerald Pfeifer
00:26 Install problem Liu WS

November 07, 2000
23:21 README.gnat (was: Patch to remove more EGCS references) Gerald Pfeifer
22:16 LAPACK 3.0 with g77 from current snapshot on Irix6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
20:29 Re: "make dist" support Jeffrey A Law
19:46 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P for big endian Jeffrey A Law
19:22 Re: more on the C++ abstraction penalty Mark Mitchell
18:24 Re: more on the C++ abstraction penalty Gabriel Dos Reis
17:30 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Bourne-again Superuser
16:49 MODES_TIEABLE_P for big endian Joern Rennecke
16:17 Re: c++ language question Eric Christopher
16:08 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Geoff Keating
16:08 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Tom Tromey
16:04 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Tom Tromey
15:55 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Robert Dewar
15:49 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Kevin Ryde
15:47 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Mo McKinlay
15:38 Re: RFA: Unterminated string constants in m88k.h Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:35 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Torbjorn Granlund
15:27 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Robert Dewar
15:20 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Joseph S. Myers
15:13 Re: more on the C++ abstraction penalty Joe Buck
14:55 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Robert Dewar
14:50 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Mo McKinlay
14:49 Re: more on the C++ abstraction penalty Gabriel Dos Reis
14:32 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Torbjorn Granlund
14:12 Re: config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Mo McKinlay
14:02 Re: Problems with stl_vector and GCC 2.95.2 19991024 Geoff Keating
13:53 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Richard Henderson
13:48 Re: Problems with stl_vector and GCC 2.95.2 19991024 Joe Buck
13:27 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Zack Weinberg
13:24 config.sub pentium2 and pentiumii aliases (fwd) Ben Elliston
12:36 Re: Release criteria status Jeffrey A Law
12:33 Re: Host-only port for Mac OS X? Mark F Rodriguez
12:19 Re: update contribute.html for regression testing Jeffrey A Law
11:26 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Jamie Lokier
10:47 Re: Patch to avoid "string length > minimum length" warnings for C++ Richard Henderson
10:25 protoize Dawn Schepleng
09:44 more on the C++ abstraction penalty Joe Buck
09:33 Re: update contribute.html for regression testing Joseph S. Myers
09:24 Re: Problems with stl_vector and GCC 2.95.2 19991024 Joe Buck
09:17 Re: update contribute.html for regression testing Joe Buck
08:56 Re: update contribute.html for regression testing Joseph S. Myers
08:36 Re: update contribute.html for regression testing Gerald Pfeifer
08:20 Reisepaesse Sprintcomp
08:14 update contribute.html for regression testing Robert Lipe
07:26 Re: AIX: linking xlc libs with gcc David Edelsohn
06:08 Re: profiling a MT-App (with shared libs) on Linux Andreas Jaeger
06:04 profiling a MT-App (with shared libs) on Linux Lothar Werzinger
05:31 Problems with stl_vector and GCC 2.95.2 19991024 Ryan Lubke
03:58 AIX: linking xlc libs with gcc Platzer Wolfgang
02:52 Re: contributing to gcc, and problem report #655 Gerald Pfeifer

November 06, 2000
23:41 contributing to gcc, and problem report #655 Scott Collins
18:55 Re: Host-only port for Mac OS X? Marcus G. Daniels
18:45 Re: c++ language question Eric Christopher
18:40 Re: c++ language question Mike Stump
18:22 c++ language question Eric Christopher
18:13 Re: Autotools Mark Mitchell
18:05 Re: Autotools Alexandre Oliva
17:53 Re: Release criteria status Mark Mitchell
17:50 Re: Release criteria status Joe Buck
17:43 Re: RFA: Unterminated string constants in m88k.h Nick Clifton
17:34 Host-only port for Mac OS X? Stan Shebs
17:09 Re: RFA: Unterminated string constants in m88k.h Philipp Thomas
16:58 Re: Release criteria status Mike Stump
16:55 gcc-ss-20001106 is now available law
16:08 Re: Release criteria status Michael Still
15:06 Who issues GNU software (was: CodeSourcery's online test compilation) Gerald Pfeifer
14:46 Re: gcc austrian mirror Joseph S. Myers
14:41 Re: gcc austrian mirror Gerald Pfeifer
12:06 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Alexandre Petit-Bianco
11:54 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Gerald Pfeifer
11:27 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Bourne-again Superuser
11:11 Re: "make dist" support Joseph S. Myers
10:37 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Mark Mitchell
10:31 [ANNOUNCE] Libgcj relocation announce. Alexandre Petit-Bianco
09:12 Re: duplicate symbols on HP-PA Jeffrey A Law
08:09 Re: "make dist" support Jeffrey A Law
06:01 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Nick Ing-Simmons
02:46 Re: Release criteria status Gerald Pfeifer

November 05, 2000
23:34 gcc austrian mirror Antonin Sprinzl
22:47 Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary Zack Weinberg
22:45 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Zack Weinberg
19:28 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Jeffrey A Law
15:35 Re: Copyright assignment Gerald Pfeifer
09:52 Re: Debug formats on Linux jfm2
09:24 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Laurent Guerby
08:53 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Laurent Guerby
08:32 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Arnaud Charlet
08:24 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
07:49 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Stallman
07:41 Re: Debug formats on Linux Tim Prince
04:27 Re: Debug formats on Linux Robert Dewar
04:08 Re: Debug formats on Linux Richard Zidlicky
03:55 Copyright assignment Laurynas Biveinis
01:47 Re: [NeilB@earthling.net: Re: HTML page for tree.def] Bill Wendling

November 04, 2000
17:58 Autotools Mark Mitchell
14:55 gcov-io.h and libgcc GPL exception Joseph S. Myers
14:28 Re: help installing gcc Gerald Pfeifer
14:15 Re: -cvs lists oddities Gerald Pfeifer
14:09 Re: -cvs lists oddities Joseph S. Myers
13:59 Re: -cvs lists oddities Gerald Pfeifer
12:05 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Arnaud Charlet
11:18 Re: Switch to V3 library Mike Stump
09:04 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
08:53 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Stallman
07:04 cpp0 performance regressions Neil Booth
05:05 return register clobbering: addition Dmitry Pugachev
05:01 return register clobbering Dmitry Pugachev

November 03, 2000
20:46 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:49 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Bourne-again Superuser
19:03 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Alexandre Oliva
18:31 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Russ Allbery
18:03 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Linus Torvalds
17:56 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Russ Allbery
17:29 Re: Release criteria status Mark Mitchell
16:52 Re: Release criteria status Joe Buck
16:08 "make dist" support Joseph S. Myers
15:14 [NeilB@earthling.net: Re: HTML page for tree.def] Neil Booth
14:52 Re: Switch to V3 library Phil Edwards
14:23 Switch to V3 library Mark Mitchell
14:12 Re: Release criteria status Mark Mitchell
13:40 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Stallman
12:57 Re: Release criteria status Joseph S. Myers
12:50 make versionitis? (OpenBSD) Donn Terry
12:09 Re: Release criteria status Mark Mitchell
11:54 Re: Analysis of remaining EGCS references Phil Edwards
11:50 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Toon Moene
11:48 Re: Release criteria status Gerald Pfeifer
11:26 Analysis of remaining EGCS references Joseph S. Myers
11:05 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Geoff Keating
10:57 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Richard Henderson
10:55 Patch to avoid "string length > minimum length" warnings for C++ Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:53 Re: analysis of gnats g++/720: abstraction penalty/inliningproblems Mark Mitchell
10:23 analysis of gnats g++/720: abstraction penalty/inlining problems Joe Buck
10:07 Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary Mark Mitchell
09:38 Re: V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Joern Rennecke
09:36 Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary Joseph S. Myers
08:52 Re: HTML page for tree.def Bill Wendling
08:41 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Florian Weimer
08:30 Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary Michael Matz
08:13 Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary Mark Mitchell
07:47 RE: A sick idea - mmapped file output Karl Cooper
07:36 Stack alignment ? in latest ss David Ronis
07:24 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Michael Meissner
04:34 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) John P. Pietrzak
03:38 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts Jan Hubicka
02:09 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) Richard Kenner
02:00 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts Bernd Schmidt
01:00 HTML page for tree.def Bill Wendling
00:58 Re: odd Makefile construct - anyone know why? Zack Weinberg
00:56 Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary Zack Weinberg
00:52 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Zack Weinberg
00:42 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts Richard Henderson
00:28 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Tim Prince

November 02, 2000
23:59 Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary Mark Mitchell
23:53 V3 and Integrated CPP [was Re: V3 PATCH: Disable wide-character tests where necessary] Neil Booth
23:40 Re: Debug formats on Linux jfm2
23:30 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Richard Henderson
22:56 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Mark Mitchell
22:54 request to put the code of machine independent stackprotection Hiroaki Etoh
22:45 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Zack Weinberg
22:37 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Michael Matz
22:34 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts John Wehle
22:25 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output John Clarke
22:16 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Sam TH
22:10 Re: A sick idea - mmapped file output Mark Mitchell
22:08 RE: A sick idea - mmapped file output Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
21:54 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts Richard Henderson
21:54 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts Richard Henderson
21:50 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts Richard Henderson
21:40 A sick idea - mmapped file output Zack Weinberg
21:02 Re: shared libg2c? Michael Matz
19:28 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) reedkotler
18:39 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) Robert Dewar
18:32 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
18:21 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
16:45 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts John Wehle
16:25 Re: Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts Toshi Morita
16:25 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Geoff Keating
16:08 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Mike Stump
16:07 Three items from the bleeding edge Michael Vance
16:07 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) Richard Kenner
16:01 Half-baked i386 stack alignment thoughts John Wehle
15:45 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) Joe Buck
15:44 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) reedkotler
15:09 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Joe Buck
15:06 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Joe Buck
15:03 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) Joe Buck
15:03 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Stallman
14:59 Re: linux-kernels and -foptimize-sibling-calls Franz Sirl
14:09 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Laurent Guerby
14:06 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? (really ia64 port and NDAs) Jim Wilson
13:34 Ada/GCC testing (was: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?) Laurent Guerby
13:22 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
13:19 Re: Debug formats on Linux jfm2
13:18 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? John P. Pietrzak
13:02 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
11:46 Re: duplicate symbols on HP-PA John David Anglin
11:35 Re: Debug formats on Linux Richard Zidlicky
11:19 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Neil Booth
10:46 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Henderson
10:14 Re: Gcc extra alignment.. John Wehle
08:38 Re: Gcc extra alignment.. Jamie Lokier
08:33 [PATCH] Re: failure in gcc compile Jakub Jelinek
08:30 Re: gcc for HP-Unix 11.0 Robert Dewar
08:28 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
08:26 Re: gcc for HP-Unix 11.0 Jeffrey A Law
08:19 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
08:08 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
07:59 Re: failure in gcc compile Alexandre Oliva
07:58 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? John P. Pietrzak
07:57 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Alexandre Oliva
07:47 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
07:45 Re: gcc for HP-Unix 11.0 Robert Dewar
07:42 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
07:41 Re: gcc for HP-Unix 11.0 Jeffrey A Law
07:40 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
07:37 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
07:35 Re: gcc for HP-Unix 11.0 Robert Dewar
07:31 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
07:28 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
07:25 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
07:24 failure in gcc compile Kenward Vaughan
07:22 Re: gcc for HP-Unix 11.0 Jeffrey A Law
05:54 gcc for HP-Unix 11.0 Karsten Burger
05:15 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
05:13 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
05:03 size of cdata types brahmaiah vallabhaneni
04:57 Re: gcc warning Robert Dewar
04:56 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
04:52 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
04:41 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
04:40 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
04:36 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
04:35 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
03:18 Re: gcc warning Florian Weimer
01:18 Re: EGCS->GCC: Snapshot names Gerald Pfeifer
01:17 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Geoff Keating
01:09 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Henderson
01:07 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Geoff Keating
00:48 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Henderson
00:20 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Gerald Pfeifer

November 01, 2000
23:58 Re: C99 status.html query Neil Booth
23:51 Strange problem with exceptions Denis Perchine
22:24 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Mike Stump
22:16 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
22:11 Re: C99 status.html query Zack Weinberg
21:44 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
21:38 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
21:36 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
21:30 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
21:29 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
21:28 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Mike Stump
21:17 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
21:12 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
21:10 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
21:08 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
21:03 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
21:01 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:59 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
20:48 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Mike Stump
20:39 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:38 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
20:35 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Mike Stump
20:34 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:32 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:28 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:27 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:26 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:19 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Daniel Berlin
20:17 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Mike Stump
20:13 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Stan Shebs
20:13 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
20:10 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Mike Stump
20:05 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:03 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Daniel Berlin
20:02 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:01 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
20:00 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:58 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:54 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:53 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Stan Shebs
19:47 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:46 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Chris G. Demetriou
19:43 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:42 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Mike Stump
19:40 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
19:38 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Stan Shebs
19:31 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:23 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:20 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
19:20 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:18 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:16 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Daniel Berlin
19:08 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
19:06 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
18:58 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
18:54 BINFO error?? Liu WS
18:53 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
18:51 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
18:49 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
18:47 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
18:26 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
18:23 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
18:22 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
18:21 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
18:11 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
18:09 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? David Starner
18:09 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
18:07 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
17:58 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
17:51 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Henderson
17:39 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
16:44 Re: Gcc extra alignment.. John Wehle
16:18 Re: C99 status.html query Joseph S. Myers
16:10 Re: Gcc extra alignment.. Jamie Lokier
16:09 Re: C99 status.html query Neil Booth
16:05 Re: C99 status.html query Joseph S. Myers
15:54 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Jeffrey A Law
15:48 C99 status.html query Neil Booth
14:59 Re: error_mark_node Mark Mitchell
14:12 Re: gcc warning Gabriel Dos Reis
14:09 Re: shared libg2c? Toon Moene
13:47 Re: gcc warning Joe Buck
13:43 Re: linux-kernels and -foptimize-sibling-calls Richard Henderson
13:24 Re: Stale link to "Tree Representation Internals" Gerald Pfeifer
13:05 Re: gcc warning Gabriel Dos Reis
12:28 Re: error_mark_node Mike Stump
12:14 Re: gcc3.0 debugging format on solaris? Robert Dewar
12:09 Re: linux-kernels and -foptimize-sibling-calls Franz Sirl
12:07 Re: Class compilation Alexandre Oliva
12:02 Class compilation Leonardo Zacche.ctz
11:46 Re: How about breaking out the big system case construct from configure.in? Stan Shebs
11:44 gcc3.0 debugging format on solaris? Neelakanth
11:32 Re: shared libg2c? Eric W. Biederman
11:05 Re: GCC Support for IBM405GP Geoff Keating
10:44 Re: gcc-ss-20001101 is now available Joe Buck
10:43 Re: How about breaking out the big system case construct from configure.in? Jeffrey A Law
09:56 Re: egcs-g++-20001030.tar.gz Jeffrey A Law
09:53 Re: gcc-ss-20001101 is now available Alexandre Oliva
09:29 Re: egcs-g++-20001030.tar.gz Gerald Pfeifer
09:24 glibc 2.2 related question Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
09:20 How about breaking out the big system case construct from configure.in? Hans-Peter Nilsson
09:12 Re: gcc warning Joe Buck
09:05 Re: gcc-ss-20001101 is now available Joseph S. Myers
08:56 Re: odd Makefile construct - anyone know why? Jeffrey A Law
08:38 gcc-ss-20001101 is now available law
08:31 Re: install gcc 2.95.2 on Redhat 7.0 Gerald Pfeifer
08:24 GCC Support for IBM405GP Roger Kirk
08:17 Re: error_mark Mark Mitchell
08:12 egcs-g++-20001030.tar.gz Jeffrey A Law
08:03 Re: Header file installation Daniel Jacobowitz
07:56 error_mark Denis Perchine
07:52 Re: Installing GCC Gerald Pfeifer
07:38 Re: error_mark_node Mark Mitchell
07:22 Re: Help installing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Gerald Pfeifer
06:06 error_mark_node Nathan Sidwell
05:43 Re: shared libg2c? Michael Matz
01:08 Re: Gcc extra alignment.. Mark Mitchell
00:56 Re: gcc warning (g++ warning) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:56 Re: Gcc extra alignment.. Christian Iseli


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.6