This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: minor installation problem
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: minor installation problem
- From: Ulrich Lauther <ulrich dot lauther at mchp dot siemens dot de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:17:45 +0200 (MET DST)
- CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: Ulrich dot Lauther at mchp dot siemens dot de
> On Oct 11, 2000, Ulrich Lauther <ulrich.lauther@mchp.siemens.de> wrote:
>
> > After installation, some libraries (e.g. libgcc.a) are not readable and I have to
> > fix permission by hand.
>
> AFAIK, libraries are installed with permissions implied by the
> builder's or installer's umask.
>
and is this a good idea? I don't want to make all my root-files world readable,
but typically I want just that for the libs.
And why are libs handled this way, but not the executables?
--
-lauther
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ulrich Lauther ph: +49 89 636 48834 fx: ... 636 42284
Siemens ZT SE 4 Internet: Ulrich.Lauther@mchp.siemens.de