This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup patches to build libgcj on x86/linux
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup patches to build libgcj on x86/linux
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 26 Jul 2000 04:58:18 -0300
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: apbianco at redhat dot com, java-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200007260641.XAA11723@deliverance.cygnus.com><14718.35743.961158.388130@deliverance.cygnus.com><397E9736.B6B5C170@albatross.co.nz>
On Jul 26, 2000, Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz> wrote:
> Alexandre Petit-Bianco wrote:
>> The C++ compiler all in a sudden started to be really picky -- or did
>> we have a way to silence it before which broke all in a sudden?
> I cant even build libstdc++ with the current compiler.
Yep. I seem to recall the C++ maintainers had decided to drop the
equivalence between () and (...) in extern "C" declarations. That's
probably what has started to break all the hell lose :-(
Not even cp/exception.cc will build for libgcc on
i686-pc-linux-gnu-x-mn10300-elf :-(
g++ interprets the () declarations of unexpected() and terminate() in
the `exception' header file as (...), takes the declarations in
`exception.cc' as (), then complains that the calls to these functions
are ambiguous :-(
The GCC automatic regression tester has started to complain about the
very same failure by 4 PM (PDT). Nathan?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me