This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: empty function optimizations

To: janr at molienergy dot bc dot ca
Subject: Re: empty function optimizations
From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:06:36 +0200
CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <71B30885B657D111809D080009EEBBF3F31366@mailserv.molienergy.bc.ca>

> I thought that any function calling operator++ on an iterator would need to
> know sizeof(T)?

Well, list::operator++ specifically does not need to know the size of
the list elements; it is a linked list. OTOH, list::insert (which does
call operator++) not only needs to know sizeof(T), but also copy
constructors.

Regards,
Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: empty function optimizations
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- RE: empty function optimizations
  - From: Jan Reimers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]