This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: My proposal for the libgcc runtime ABI (ia64 gcc/glibc is broken.)
- To: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: My proposal for the libgcc runtime ABI (ia64 gcc/glibc is broken.)
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:10:10 -0700
- Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>, Mark Kettenis <kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl>, hjl at valinux dot com, rth at twiddle dot net, libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <m3bt04k58c.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <5003.963333245@upchuck>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:34:05AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> Some native systems have multilibs. alphas for example, maybe sparcs.
> And in the embedded linux world we will likely have systems that need
> multilibs. We can't simply ignore those issues.
It'll take more than these two to convince me that we need multilibs on
natives. Alpha can just as well use -mieee as the default build for
libgcc.so. The sparc64 variants are used for sizing the memory model,
which is a non-issue if we put the thing in a DSO.
r~