This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: const_iterator oddness?

To: llewelly at dbritsch dot dsl dot xmission dot com
Subject: Re: const_iterator oddness?
From: Michael Vance <briareos at lokigames dot com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 16:52:53 -0700
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006141642260.9172-100000@propylaea.anduin.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006141646090.24522-100000@dbritsch.dsl.xmission.com>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 04:50:20PM -0600, llewelly@dbritsch.dsl.xmission.com wrote:

> Yes, T::const_iterator needs to be qualified with typename.

Thanks.

> by the way, the original question is a general c++ question; it should
>   have been sent to comp.lang.c++.moderated or something similar; not to

This code compiles on several other compilers without
complaint. Regardless of its correct-ness, the original author
considered it a gcc issue.

m.

-- 
Programmer             "Ha ha." "Ha ha." "What are you laughing at?"
Loki Software                      "Just the horror of being alive."
http://lokigames.com/~briareos/                   - Tony Millionaire

References:
- Re: const_iterator oddness?
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: const_iterator oddness?
  - From: llewelly

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]