This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: How inlined are inlined functions?

To: jbuck at synopsys dot COM
Subject: Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 12:26:25 -0800
Cc: oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br, jimb at cygnus dot com, egcs at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <19991203114355J.mitchell@codesourcery.com><199912032011.MAA14376@atrus.synopsys.com>

>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.COM> writes:

    Joe> You are more of an expert on the standard than I am, but it
    Joe> seems that the issue of trashing of automatic variables
    Joe> shouldn't be ignored even if the keyword "inline" appears.

I think I misunderstood what Alexandre was getting at, and I think
you're right.  I'll check into this, and modify the code accordingly,
if necessary.

Thanks!

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]