gcc archive
date index for December, 1999

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 31, 1999
23:54 multipy-defined function vuqpham
11:44 Re: looking for a binary executible of gcc N8TM
10:49 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Joern Rennecke
10:21 looking for a binary executible of gcc Michael Brady
08:26 cccp.c compile error in 2.95.2 Bruce Korb
04:06 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Denis Chertykov
01:56 Re: Inlining Improvements Kevin Atkinson
01:06 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS Richard Kenner

December 30, 1999
14:10 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 Alain Magloire
13:25 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure Martin v. Loewis
13:07 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Martin v. Loewis
12:55 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure Joern Rennecke
12:41 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Richard Henderson
11:52 LEADS, LEADS AND MORE LEADS Paul D. Townsend
11:24 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Linus Torvalds
09:55 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Mark Kettenis
09:37 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS Joern Rennecke
09:28 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 Harvey J. Stein
09:20 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure Joern Rennecke
09:04 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments Erik Mouw
08:59 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 Bruce Korb
08:36 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments Gerald Pfeifer
08:25 Re: Reply-To: (was: -fnew-abi and branching) Phil Edwards
08:25 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments Albert E. Whale
07:40 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments Martin v. Loewis
07:10 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments Erik Mouw
06:10 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 Andi Kleen
05:51 Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments Albert E. Whale
05:13 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 Martin v. Loewis
05:00 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 Andi Kleen
04:28 Re: Help on GNU Fortran development Marc Lehmann
03:40 build status gcc 2.95.2 Tobias Walkowiak
03:24 Why Do SOME PEOPLE SUCCEED In Internet Business While Others Fail? internetbusiness30
02:28 Re: More on type sizes Richard Kenner
02:16 Re: Apology Richard Kenner
02:10 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS Richard Kenner
01:19 Re: Problem with calling conventions. Martin v. Loewis
00:58 Re: Help on GNU Fortran development Martin v. Loewis
00:43 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 Martin v. Loewis

December 29, 1999
22:55 Re: More on type sizes Per Bothner
21:43 Re: Apology Mark Mitchell
20:10 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure Jeffrey A Law
19:31 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS Joern Rennecke
18:58 Re: Web pages (was: GCC museum?) Rich Churcher
18:14 Apology Jeffrey A Law
17:49 Reply-To: (was: -fnew-abi and branching) Gerald Pfeifer
17:35 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS Richard Kenner
17:07 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS Joern Rennecke
17:03 Re: More on type sizes Richard Kenner
16:56 Re: More on type sizes Per Bothner
16:33 Re: More on type sizes Richard Kenner
16:28 Re: More on type sizes Joern Rennecke
16:15 Re: More on type sizes Richard Kenner
15:50 Re: More on type sizes Joern Rennecke
15:26 Re: More on type sizes Richard Kenner
15:19 Re: More on type sizes Joern Rennecke
13:26 Web pages (was: GCC museum?) Gerald Pfeifer
11:12 Re: -fnew-abi and branching Phil Edwards
11:00 Re: -fnew-abi and branching Tom Tromey
10:49 Re: -fnew-abi and branching Gabriel Dos Reis
10:31 Re: -fnew-abi and branching Mark Mitchell
10:18 Re: killing STDC_0_IN_SYSTEM_HEADERS Joern Rennecke
09:55 Re: -fnew-abi and branching Jeffrey A Law
09:41 Re: -fnew-abi and branching Benjamin Kosnik
09:41 Re: -fnew-abi and branching Mark Mitchell
05:20 Re: GCC museum? Rich Churcher
04:14 Re: -fnew-abi and branching Gabriel Dos Reis

December 28, 1999
22:44 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches David Edelsohn
22:33 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches Jeffrey A Law
22:09 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches linas
20:01 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 Per Bothner
18:50 Re: GCC museum? Rich Churcher
17:33 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches Mike Stump
16:55 Re: Compiling old source code Mike Stump
15:41 Re: GCC For Embedded!? Mike Stump
15:33 Re: GCC speed Mike Stump
14:47 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Linus Torvalds
14:21 -fnew-abi and branching Mark Mitchell
14:11 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later Jeffrey A Law
14:10 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later Jeffrey A Law
14:10 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Jeffrey A Law
11:09 gcc-ss-19991228 is now available law
05:09 MAKE THE MILLENNIUM COUNT!!! QCSBS
03:23 Re: Why is dynamic_cast so dam slow? Nathan Sidwell
01:16 Private Club Pays You by The Minute. johnboyd22

December 27, 1999
14:02 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches Alan Cox
13:30 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 John Wehle
12:03 Re: gcc Help Wanted? Geoff Keating
11:30 Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2 korbb
11:27 gcc Help Wanted? Chiradeep Chakrabarti
11:02 Compiling old source code Jose Felix Hernandez
09:37 Re[4]: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Roman Belenov
09:12 Re: Re[2]: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Matthew Brown
08:38 Re: GCC for Win95 N8TM
08:30 Re: GCC for Win95 Artem Hodyush
08:24 Re: GCC for Win95 Artem Hodyush
07:35 Help on GNU Fortran development Nuno Pinhão
02:46 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later Martin v. Loewis
02:41 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later Andi Kleen

December 26, 1999
22:53 Re: Bootstraps every night? Dave Avery
21:17 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later Tim Josling
20:22 killing STDC_0_IN_SYSTEM_HEADERS Zack Weinberg
16:01 Re: Why is dynamic_cast so dam slow? Martin v. Loewis
15:17 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later Geoff Keating
14:51 Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library? Martin v. Loewis
13:15 Why is dynamic_cast so dam slow? Kevin Atkinson
12:40 Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later Tim Josling
12:16 Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library? Tim Josling
11:26 Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library? Mikael Djurfeldt
11:11 Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library? Per Bothner
10:56 Converting the gcc backend to a library? Mikael Djurfeldt
03:44 More on type sizes Richard Kenner
02:28 Re: GCC for Win95 Ulrich Lauther

December 25, 1999
18:36 sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS Richard Kenner
10:19 Re: GCC for Win95 Roman Belenov
09:08 GCC for Win95 realthing
08:59 GCC for Win95 realthing

December 24, 1999
13:02 Re: help with specs files Nick Clifton
12:46 help with specs files Marty Leisner
11:41 Re: Segment register support for the i386 Linus Torvalds
08:42 Segment register support for the i386 Mark Kettenis
06:28 Re: Problem with calling conventions. Michael Meissner
05:37 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
04:47 Re: Problem with calling conventions. Erik Mouw
03:44 Problem with calling conventions. Mansoor Peerbhoy
01:56 build success Markus Mertens

December 23, 1999
22:45 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure Joern Rennecke
18:03 Re: Linux vs. libio Gerald Pfeifer
17:55 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches Linus Torvalds
17:44 g77 Help Wanted? GAVELLE NOEL
17:43 Re: Delete files within Fortran N8TM
16:44 Re: GCC museum? Gerald Pfeifer
15:39 Delete files within Fortran James Mullaney
11:19 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Phil Edwards
10:58 Re: Having problems Brian Ford
10:53 Having problems GLASGOW, Tee - Motel 6
10:34 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches Alexandre Oliva
09:18 g77 Help Wanted? Robert J. Schweikert
08:15 Re: gcc on m88k Brian Ford
03:05 Re[2]: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Roman Belenov
02:33 Re: GCC speed Gerald Pfeifer
02:21 Re: GCC speed Martin v. Loewis
02:20 gcc on m88k Ulf Bartelt
02:15 Re: GCC For Embedded!? Martin v. Loewis

December 22, 1999
22:53 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Benjamin Kosnik
20:51 Re: Linux vs. libio Linus Torvalds
18:42 GCC For Embedded!? CIH
17:44 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches David Edelsohn
17:36 Re: valarray??? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:15 GCC speed Andy Rysin
17:01 IBM Linux/390 patches Peter Schulte-Stracke
15:36 Re: Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch] Geoff Keating
15:30 Re: precompiled headers / dependency checking Michael Vance
14:23 Re: Porting the GCC to 8051-Microcontroller ? Register Banks Richard Hadsell
14:02 precompiled headers / dependency checking michael cardenas
13:05 Re: Porting the GCC to 8051-Microcontroller ? Register Banks Joern Rennecke
11:55 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Matthew Brown
11:45 Re: valarray??? llewelly
11:24 Re: 64 bit gcc/g++ 2.95.2 on solaris 7 (sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7) Alexandre Oliva
11:15 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Mumit Khan
10:34 64 bit gcc/g++ 2.95.2 on solaris 7 (sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7) Marciniszyn, Mike (WingspanTec
10:15 Re: Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch] Marc Lehmann
09:45 Re: Bootstraps every night? David Edelsohn
09:28 g77 Help Wanted? William F Severance
09:00 Porting the GCC to 8051-Microcontroller ? Register Banks Anja Müller
08:52 Re: valarray??? Phil Edwards
08:22 Bootstraps every night? Jan Hubicka
08:08 valarray??? Steve Ettorre
07:58 Re: Inlining Improvements Mark Mitchell
07:38 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Matthew Brown
06:57 Re: Inlining Improvements Jamie Lokier
06:52 Re: g77 Help Wanted? Brian Ford
04:47 Re: Is libstdc++ in stock egcs 1.1.2 thread-safe? Martin v. Loewis
03:18 Re: problem with egcs... Martin v. Loewis
03:01 Is libstdc++ in stock egcs 1.1.2 thread-safe? Shmulik Rippa
01:56 Re: Inlining Improvements Martin v. Loewis
00:35 Re: Inlining Improvements Martin v. Loewis
00:15 Re: Inlining Improvements Marcin Dalecki
00:04 Re: Inlining Improvements Martin v. Loewis

December 21, 1999
21:15 Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7 Benjamin Kosnik
19:19 g77 Help Wanted? ezeng
18:22 problem with egcs... Steve Ettorre
18:02 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
17:04 Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples) Joern Rennecke
16:08 Re: Inlining Improvements Joe Buck
16:00 Re: Inlining Improvements Jamie Lokier
15:53 Re: Linux vs. libio Michael Vance
15:11 Re: Linux vs. libio Mike Stump
15:06 Re: Linux vs. libio Marc Espie
15:03 Re: Linux vs. libio Marc Espie
14:52 FAQ-O-Matic bugs Mike Stump
13:36 Re: Linux vs. libio Geoff Keating
13:21 Re: Internal macros as fns for debug Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:36 Re: Internal macros as fns for debug Doug Landauer
12:01 Internal macros as fns for debug (was: Re: regno_reg_rtx and relatedmacros) Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:53 Re: FAQ-O-Matic Jeffrey A Law
11:38 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
11:33 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
11:23 Re: Linux vs. libio Kevin Atkinson
10:05 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
09:46 Re: Inlining Improvements Martin v. Loewis
09:43 Re: Inlining Improvements Jeffrey A Law
09:06 Re: Inlining Improvements Jamie Lokier
08:55 Re: Inlining Improvements Mark Mitchell
08:04 Re: Inlining Improvements Jamie Lokier
05:24 gcc-ss-19991221 is now available law
04:59 Re: Inlining Improvements Martin v. Loewis
04:54 Re: g++: change in behaviour since gcc-2.95.2 Martin v. Loewis
03:22 Re: Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch] Jan Vroonhof
02:49 Inlining Improvements Oskar Enoksson
02:25 g++: change in behaviour since gcc-2.95.2 Martin Reinecke
01:15 Re: Linux vs. libio Marc Lehmann

December 20, 1999
23:55 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
23:02 Re: Linux vs. libio Kevin Atkinson
22:41 tone of recent discussion re: libio, Linux and new ABI Joe Buck
22:24 FAQ-O-Matic Mike Stump
21:35 Re: "C--" N8TM
21:19 Re: "C--" Robert Lipe
21:05 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
20:56 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
20:47 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
20:30 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
20:19 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
20:13 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
20:02 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
19:32 "C--" Rick Hohensee
19:12 Re: Linux vs. libio Geoff Keating
18:41 Re: Autoincrement patches Michael Hayes
18:33 Re: Autoincrement patches Joern Rennecke
18:23 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
18:18 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
18:13 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
18:08 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
18:01 Re: Deriving into different namespaces Georg C. F. Greve
17:43 Re: Linux vs. libio Geoff Keating
17:01 Re: Linux vs. libio Mike Stump
16:50 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
16:41 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
16:33 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
16:31 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
16:22 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
16:20 Re: Linux vs. libio Linus Torvalds
16:14 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
16:02 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
15:55 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
15:45 Re: DSSL home page Gerald Pfeifer
15:41 Re: DSSL home page Joe Buck
15:38 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
15:31 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
15:19 DSSL home page Martin v. Loewis
15:11 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
15:07 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
15:05 Re: Linux vs. libio Geoff Keating
14:46 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
14:45 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
14:43 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
14:40 Re: Linux vs. libio Geoff Keating
14:34 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
14:26 Re: Linux vs. libio Jonathan Larmour
13:55 Re: Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch] Marc Lehmann
13:51 gcc and arm and swi Lance Uyehara
13:45 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
12:57 Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch] Jan Vroonhof
12:49 Re: gcc-ss-19991214 is now available Marc Girod
12:46 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
12:28 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
12:12 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
12:02 Re: Linux vs. libio Kevin Atkinson
11:58 Re: Linux vs. libio Geoff Keating
11:55 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
11:46 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
11:28 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
11:07 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
11:06 Re: Linux vs. libio Joern Rennecke
10:43 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
10:31 Re: Deriving into different namespaces Martin v. Loewis
10:05 Re: Linux vs. libio Joe Buck
10:00 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
09:34 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
09:28 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
09:26 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
09:24 Re: Linux vs. libio Jason Merrill
09:20 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
09:18 Re: Linux vs. libio Jamie Lokier
09:16 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
09:11 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
09:09 Re: Linux vs. libio Jamie Lokier
08:52 Re: Linux vs. libio Per Bothner
08:19 Re: gcc-2.95.2: configure option --with-local-prefix Andreas Schwab
07:16 Deriving into different namespaces Georg C. F. Greve
07:11 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
06:47 Re: Linux vs. libio Martin v. Loewis
05:25 Re: gcc2@cygnus.com Jeffrey A Law
05:23 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Jeffrey A Law
05:22 Re: Linux vs. libio Jeffrey A Law
00:02 Re: GCC compiler llewelly

December 19, 1999
23:55 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
23:48 GCC compiler Hung Vu
23:41 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
23:35 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
23:27 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
23:21 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
23:14 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
23:11 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
22:58 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
22:47 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
22:44 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
22:33 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
22:30 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
22:28 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
22:21 Re: Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
21:53 Re: Linux vs. libio Geoff Keating
21:15 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Geoff Keating
21:04 Re: Linux vs. libio Ulrich Drepper
19:30 Re: Linux vs. libio H.J. Lu
18:35 Linux vs. libio Mark Mitchell
15:41 gcc2@cygnus.com Gerald Pfeifer
15:37 GET YOUR MONEY FROM A LAWSUIT and MAKE MONEY DOING IT! brian_robson
13:32 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Mumit Khan
12:39 gcc-2.95.2: configure option --with-local-prefix Reinhard Nissl
10:11 Re: MINIMUM_ATOMIC_ALIGNMENT ??? Dima Volodin
09:48 Re: MINIMUM_ATOMIC_ALIGNMENT ??? Richard Kenner
09:47 MINIMUM_ATOMIC_ALIGNMENT ??? Dima Volodin
02:38 Re: GCC museum? Rich Churcher
02:33 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Richard Kenner

December 18, 1999
22:59 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros David S. Miller
22:56 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros llewelly
21:53 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros David S. Miller
18:37 Re: Compile bug? Curtis R. Anderson
18:03 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Richard Kenner
17:57 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Mark Mitchell
17:48 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Richard Kenner
17:46 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Bernd Schmidt
17:43 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Mark Mitchell
17:39 Re: sizeof bool > sizeof int ?!? Mark Mitchell
17:29 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Richard Kenner
17:14 Re: sizeof bool > sizeof int ?!? Gerald Pfeifer
15:11 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Mark Mitchell
13:52 Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2 Martin v. Loewis
11:46 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Richard Kenner
11:38 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Mark Mitchell
11:20 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Bernd Schmidt
10:01 RE:Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2 Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
09:49 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros Joern Rennecke
09:47 Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2 Martin v. Loewis
07:10 regno_reg_rtx and related macros Richard Kenner
02:19 Home Loans & Refinancing Available HomeLoans
00:16 Re: Using and Porting the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) Curtis R. Anderson

December 17, 1999
23:26 Using and Porting the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) Nate Begeman
18:27 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
18:26 New PPC branch. Geoff Keating
18:11 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Jason Merrill
18:08 Re: Autoincrement examples Joern Rennecke
15:48 Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2 Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
15:18 Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2 Martin v. Loewis
12:39 Re: GCC museum? Gerald Pfeifer
02:44 QUESTION ON 2.95.2 Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
01:23 Re: Problem with exporting class names Martin v. Loewis
00:49 Wanted! Online Business Partners 66338294

December 16, 1999
23:18 Re: common branch conditions - could optimize better Jeffrey A Law
22:45 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Mumit Khan
22:36 Problem with exporting class names Mansoor Peerbhoy
20:58 g77 Help Wanted? rao
19:49 Re: not hoisting loads/stores Jeffrey A Law
17:43 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Jason Merrill
17:02 Re: not hoisting loads/stores Dan Nicolaescu
16:31 subscribe crossgcc mwalker@ee.pdx.edu Eric A. Ayer
15:17 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Mumit Khan
15:05 Re: Autoincrement patches Joern Rennecke
12:47 Re: common branch conditions - could optimize better Geoff Keating
05:09 Re: gcc/kcc difference response from KAI support nbecker
02:08 Re: common branch conditions - could optimize better Jeffrey A Law
01:15 Re: common branch conditions - could optimize better Jeffrey A Law
01:11 Re: not hoisting loads/stores Jeffrey A Law

December 15, 1999
17:50 g77 write bug? Scott O'Donnell
16:18 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Jason Merrill
15:55 Re: gcc/kcc difference Joe Buck
15:50 Re: gcc/kcc difference Martin v. Loewis
15:42 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Mumit Khan
15:42 Re: gcc/kcc difference Martin v. Loewis
15:33 Re: gcc/kcc difference Martin v. Loewis
13:07 Re: gcc/kcc difference Alexandre Oliva
13:07 Re: bug in internal PUSH expanding (splitting) Denis Chertykov
13:00 Re: Problem declaring a Wide char string Martin v. Loewis
12:40 Re: gcc/kcc difference Joe Buck
11:37 gcc/kcc difference nbecker
11:18 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Jason Merrill
11:05 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Mumit Khan
10:21 Re: Having trouble in porting gcc 2.95 Joern Rennecke
09:56 Satellite Owners! Must See! P40rtBhRN
09:23 bootstrap failure, genrecog, strstr, build and host Philippe De Muyter
09:08 Re: Fw: very very urgent Anil Deshpande
08:58 Re: Fw: very very urgent Gerald Pfeifer
08:44 Fw: very very urgent Anil Deshpande
08:28 Re: GCC Gerald Pfeifer
08:23 very very urgent Anil Deshpande
08:09 GCC anwar.sayid
04:52 Internet..stock..news co51ekl
03:07 AD: Home Loans - No Equity Required! loansource
03:04 Having trouble in porting gcc 2.95 Takayoshi Kouchi
02:41 Problem declaring a Wide char string Mansoor Peerbhoy
01:32 Re: bug in internal PUSH expanding (splitting) Jeffrey A Law

December 14, 1999
19:58 Re: Autoincrement patches Michael Hayes
17:33 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Jason Merrill
16:40 Alpha hasn't bootstrapped for 4 weeks (libio problem) Brad Lucier
15:49 Autoincrement patches (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples) Joern Rennecke
13:34 Re: `shorten_branches' and length of `asm' without operands Joern Rennecke
12:57 Re: `shorten_branches' and length of `asm' without operands Denis Chertykov
12:23 Re: [PATCH] F77 on sparc64-*-* toon
12:12 Re: Library Documentation Mike Stump
12:10 Re: [PATCH] F77 on sparc64-*-* toon
11:21 Re: Athlon 550 Steven W Orr
11:20 Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples) Joern Rennecke
10:52 Re: Athlon 550 Joe Buck
10:38 Athlon 550 Brian Cook
09:55 Splay Trees Guy Blelloch
09:08 Re: Pb with template Alexandre Oliva
08:43 Pb with template poulard
07:48 gcc-ss-19991214 is now available law
05:22 Library Documentation Malory D'costa
05:11 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Jamie Lokier
05:06 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Jamie Lokier

December 13, 1999
20:26 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Jason Merrill
20:20 Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples) Jeffrey A Law
19:36 Re: [PATCH] F77 on sparc64-*-* Jeffrey A Law
17:01 Re: compile question Martin v. Loewis
16:52 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Martin v. Loewis
16:36 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Martin v. Loewis
16:31 Re: Friends of template classes. Martin v. Loewis
16:24 [c++] CVS gcc-2.96 -O2 vs gcc-2.95.2 -O2 Benjamin Kosnik
15:28 Re: Autoincrement examples Joern Rennecke
15:25 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Marc Lehmann
14:59 Autoincrement example (Was: Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples)) Joern Rennecke
14:59 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Joe Buck
14:37 Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples) Joern Rennecke
14:17 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Skvarenina Peter - 5ZA51/9
12:07 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Joe Buck
11:59 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Joe Buck
11:58 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Joe Buck
11:27 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Benjamin Scherrey
10:55 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Skvarenina Peter - 5ZA51/9
10:25 Re: __property keyword support in GCC Joe Buck
09:51 __property keyword support in GCC Skvarenina Peter - 5ZA51/9
08:57 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:25 Friends of template classes. Jacek Generowicz
07:52 compile question Melissa G. Vasquez
06:44 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Jamie Lokier
06:25 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Andi Kleen
03:42 Successful installation on alphaev6-dec-osf4.0e Villumsen, Ole Vedel
02:00 Re: RTL check: access of elt 1 of `not' with last elt 0 Andreas Schwab
01:08 Re: gcc/doprnt.c Philippe De Muyter
00:04 gcc/doprnt.c Jeffrey A Law

December 12, 1999
23:29 Re: gcc 2.95.1 for windows NT Mumit Khan
21:10 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Jeffrey A Law
21:02 Re: gcc platforms Mumit Khan
20:54 gcc platforms john smith
20:28 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Kaveh R. Ghazi
09:06 Re: gcc 2.95.1 for windows NT N8TM
04:42 Re: gcc 2.95.1 for windows NT Gerald Pfeifer

December 11, 1999
18:22 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request Mumit Khan
17:57 Re: Error while building egcs-19991208 on hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00 Brown, Rodney
12:44 RTL check: access of elt 1 of `not' with last elt 0 toon
11:16 Re: Error while building egcs-19991208 on hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00 Marc Girod
11:14 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Jamie Lokier
10:55 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version(?) Mark Mitchell
10:52 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Marty Leisner
10:16 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Joe Buck
09:58 Error while building egcs-19991208 on hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00 Marc Girod
09:29 `shorten_branches' and length of `asm' without operands Denis Chertykov
07:58 g77 Help Wanted? Hristo Laftchiev
07:51 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Andreas Jaeger
06:42 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:36 Re: wstring Martin v. Loewis

December 10, 1999
23:55 wstring Mangesh Bhandarkar
17:09 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?) Gerald Pfeifer
16:59 Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples) Joern Rennecke
16:26 Steering Committee Affiliations Gerald Pfeifer
15:20 Re: Assistance Martin v. Loewis
14:46 -m32 support on sparc Brad Lucier
14:22 Re: -fexternal-templates Jason Merrill
13:36 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
09:35 Re: Re[2]: g++'s non-conformance Joe Buck
08:42 Re: Autoincrement examples Joern Rennecke
08:13 binutils 2.9.5.0.22 is released. H.J. Lu
04:51 -fexternal-templates Dr. David Gilbert

December 09, 1999
23:13 Re[2]: g++'s non-conformance Roman Belenov
21:28 Re: cpp w/DOS line feeds Per Bothner
20:27 Bookmarks Simon Barton
16:52 Re: m68k: "instruction/operands mismatch" -- Statement 'moveb a3,d1' ignored Jeffrey A Law
13:38 Re: g++'s non-conformance David Starner
13:22 g++'s non-conformance Anjul Srivastava
10:10 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking Jonathan Larmour
08:13 Re: cpp w/DOS line feeds Dave Brolley
07:39 Assistance Yixin Wang
07:23 NEW STOCK PICK - Bidhit.com: Trading symbol-BHIT pressrelease
06:45 PATCH for "FYI: hppa*-hp-hpux10 recommended patch superseded" Gerald Pfeifer
06:32 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking Andreas Schwab
05:42 Re: cpp w/DOS line feeds N8TM
02:56 H8300: bugs(?) and quirks with eightbit_data Ralf Gütlein
02:46 Re: Questional REG_N_SETS usage... Jeffrey A Law
02:44 NEW STOCK PICK - Bidhit.com: Trading symbol-BHIT pressrelease
02:37 What Fell Out Of Santas Bag !! wbrill101@yahoo.com
02:34 Questional REG_N_SETS usage... Jan Hubicka
02:00 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking Jeffrey A Law
01:37 Re: cpp w/DOS line feeds Stuart Summerville (NEC)
00:50 Re: `atexit' and destructors for local statics Mark Mitchell
00:24 `atexit' and destructors for local statics Mark Mitchell
00:11 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking Jason Gunthorpe

December 08, 1999
23:29 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking Jeffrey A Law
23:17 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Jeffrey A Law
23:02 More agressive entity removal during linking Jason Gunthorpe
22:56 Re: [Q] I downloaded gcc HP-UX 10.20 binary.... N8TM
22:55 Re: [Q] I downloaded gcc HP-UX 10.20 binary.... Mumit Khan
22:49 Re: gcc Installation on a new system (no compiler at all). N8TM
21:57 [Q] I downloaded gcc HP-UX 10.20 binary.... ironyjk
19:45 gcc Installation on a new system (no compiler at all). Cynthia Oi-Wing Lui
15:20 Re: C compiler for Psion 5 (EPOC) Mike Stump
14:38 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
11:56 Re: m68k: "instruction/operands mismatch" -- Statement 'moveb a3,d1' ignored toon
11:24 Re: CVS down? Gerald Pfeifer
11:20 Re: A small problem with the gcc-patches mailing list archives Gerald Pfeifer
10:57 Re: Autoincrement examples Joern Rennecke
10:08 gcc-ss-19991208 is now available law
08:54 Re: egcs-1.0.3 Alexandre Oliva
08:50 C compiler for Psion 5 (EPOC) Paul Caruana
08:37 Re: Results for 2.96 19991129 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu Andris Pavenis
08:13 egcs-1.0.3 Laszlo Barabas
08:00 Re: Installing gcc whithout having C compilator David Edelsohn
06:36 Re: gcc 2.95.2 problem Alexandre Oliva
06:02 New optimizations for GCC Leland Hovey
05:22 Re: Results for 2.96 19991129 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu Manfred Hollstein
05:05 Re: gcc 2.95.2 problem Brian Beuning
04:34 gcc 2.95.2 problem Piotr Nestorow
03:00 Re: Installing gcc whithout having C compilator MaherBenSedrine

December 07, 1999
23:35 Re: bb and loop profiling (was: [PATCH] sparc64-linux multilibs]) Richard Henderson
23:11 Re: bb and loop profiling (was: [PATCH] sparc64-linux multilibs]) Dan Nicolaescu
18:52 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Mike Stump
17:49 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Godmar Back
16:48 Re: Labels Question Mike Stump
16:43 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Mike Stump
13:49 Labels Question Anjul Srivastava
13:21 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Godmar Back
13:14 Re: Assistance required Martin v. Loewis
12:29 Re: Building current CVS source on solaris-2.7 Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:21 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Mike Stump
05:56 Assistance required Chris Dickens
00:18 Re: Results for 2.96 19991129 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu Andris Pavenis

December 06, 1999
17:11 Successful build of GNU C and C++ on HP-UX Austin Green
17:03 Building current CVS source on solaris-2.7 Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Godmar Back
16:36 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Jason Merrill
16:19 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Godmar Back
14:07 Re: build problems Brian Ford
11:45 Core dump while compiling with gnu gcc-2.95.2 Anil Deshpande
11:28 Re: Linux Shared Libraries - How to create? Alexandre Oliva
10:39 Linux Shared Libraries - How to create? Marcos Barreto de Castro
04:02 Decorate your cake and eat it too Providence Home Crafts
00:16 Re: SINIX support Martin v. Loewis
00:12 g77 Help Wanted? yang xu chun

December 05, 1999
22:52 there will be a new business in the line wbrill101@yahoo.com
17:53 SINIX support Zhang Yuzhu
14:12 Re: char & wchar_t encoding Martin v. Loewis
12:18 char & wchar_t encoding Gerald Gutierrez
02:05 Re: Results for 2.96 19991129 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu Manfred Hollstein

December 04, 1999
19:30 Anyone try CC=tcc make bootstrap? David Starner
13:31 not hoisting loads/stores Dan Nicolaescu
04:16 Re: MMX?? Marc Lehmann
04:16 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Marc Lehmann
03:17 Re: Large binaries! Martin v. Loewis
03:08 ARE YOU BEING INVESTIGATED?? dane482
02:56 Re: MMX?? Martin v. Loewis
02:47 INVESTIGATE ANYONE! dsaves
01:39 INVESTIGATE ANYONE! dsaves

December 03, 1999
23:42 Large binaries! Gerald Gutierrez
15:34 Re: Need Help Joern Rennecke
14:47 MMX?? John Sanabria
14:18 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Jason Merrill
14:13 Re: DB 3.0.55, memset() and overoptimizacion [#1395] Sleepycat Software
14:02 Need Help pogde prashant
12:27 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Mark Mitchell
12:13 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Joe Buck
11:44 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Mark Mitchell
11:34 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Joe Buck
11:28 RE: How inlined are inlined functions? Anjul Srivastava
11:14 RE: How inlined are inlined functions? Joe Buck
11:10 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Alexandre Oliva
10:50 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Mark Mitchell
10:49 Re: How inlined are inlined functions? Alexandre Oliva
10:14 RE: How inlined are inlined functions? Anjul Srivastava
09:39 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Robert Lipe
08:49 How inlined are inlined functions? Jim Blandy
08:25 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Phil Edwards
00:28 A small problem with the gcc-patches mailing list archives Helge Hafting

December 02, 1999
16:42 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Mike Hopkirk(hops)
16:26 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Mike Hopkirk(hops)
14:22 Re: where is symbol __CTOR_LIST__ defined? Martin v. Loewis
13:42 Re: GCC for Windows NT Martin v. Loewis
10:09 looking gcc for hpux 10.20 Tou, Brian
08:11 Re: question in install gcc on SCO unix 3.2v5.0.4 Robert Lipe
06:10 Re: dynamic_cast Problem Georg C. F. Greve
05:36 Re: dynamic_cast Problem Nathan Sidwell
05:18 dynamic_cast Problem Georg C. F. Greve
05:13 question in install gcc on SCO unix 3.2v5.0.4 wangji
02:48 egcs-19991201: problem with garbage collector in cc1 Andris Pavenis

December 01, 1999
23:59 Banned and Uncensored! Mouthwatering! vpXUEkD0f
19:41 GCC for Windows NT Nguyen Thanh Thuy
17:06 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Jeffrey A Law
17:04 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Jeffrey A Law
16:59 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Joe Buck
16:53 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Jeffrey A Law
16:51 gcc.c-torture/execute/991112-1.c: set_nonzero_bits_and_sign_copies problem Joern Rennecke
16:10 Re: Local optimization on i386 ? Marc Lehmann
14:43 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path Mike Stump
14:01 Re: varargs for decoding stack frames ? Anthony Green
13:48 Re: varargs for decoding stack frames ? Bruno Haible
13:02 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Robert Lipe
12:12 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Mike Hopkirk(hops)
11:55 where is symbol __CTOR_LIST__ defined? gary valentin
11:42 Re: AIX 4.3 and COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST David Edelsohn
11:18 Re: Why config.guess Tom Tromey
11:04 Re: RPMS for gcc-2.95.2 Chmouel Boudjnah
10:44 g77 internal question rlau
10:42 RPMS for gcc-2.95.2 Juan Jose Casero
09:50 Re: Why config.guess korbb
09:22 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Robert Lipe
09:06 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Andreas Schwab
08:47 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Alexandre Oliva
08:45 Re: Stringstreams?! Alexandre Oliva
08:24 Eastwood Recommends Vol. 8. A E
08:21 RE: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? John Hughes
08:04 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Robert Lipe
07:45 Stringstreams?! Georg C. F. Greve
05:53 egcs-19991201: compiler error in `reload_cse_simplify_operands', at reload1.c:9192 Marc Girod
05:04 Re: Local optimization on i386 ? Jamie Lokier
03:56 RE: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? John Hughes
03:33 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Alexandre Oliva
03:08 RE: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? John Hughes
03:00 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Alexandre Oliva
02:35 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Jeffrey A Law
02:28 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Alexandre Oliva
02:04 gcc-ss-19991201 is now available law
01:42 Re: Is this a bug in GNU ld? Wolfram Gloger
01:04 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff? Robert Lipe
01:03 Re: iostream problems on irix6.5.5/gcc2.95.2 Martin v. Loewis
00:53 Re: Problem building gcc-2.95.2 under SCO 2.1.1 Robert Lipe
00:49 extending libgcc's exception delivery path Godmar Back
00:11 Re: Problem building gcc-2.95.2 under SCO 2.1.1 Benjamin Scherrey


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.4